-
1
-
-
84879552876
-
-
Accessed 2016 Dec 20
-
Committee on Publication Ethics. Retraction Guidelines. 2009. http:// publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf. Accessed 2016 Dec 20.
-
(2009)
Retraction Guidelines
-
-
-
2
-
-
84867637990
-
Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
-
Oct 16;, Epub 2012 Oct 1
-
Fang FC, Steen RG, Casadevall A. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109 (42):17028-33. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
-
(2012)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
, vol.109
, Issue.42
, pp. 17028-17033
-
-
Fang, F.C.1
Steen, R.G.2
Casadevall, A.3
-
3
-
-
84927623844
-
Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications
-
Aug
-
Stern AM, Casadevall A, Steen RG, Fang FC. Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications. Elife. 2014 Aug 14;3:e02956.
-
(2014)
Elife
, vol.14
, Issue.3
, pp. e02956
-
-
Stern, A.M.1
Casadevall, A.2
Steen, R.G.3
Fang, F.C.4
-
4
-
-
84936805720
-
Perpetuation of retracted publications using the example of the Scott S. Reuben case: Incidences, reasons and possible improvements
-
Aug, Epub 2015 Jul 7
-
Bornemann-Cimenti H, Szilagyi IS, Sandner-Kiesling A. Perpetuation of retracted publications using the example of the Scott S. Reuben case: incidences, reasons and possible improvements. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Aug;22(4):1063-72. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
-
(2016)
Sci Eng Ethics
, vol.22
, Issue.4
, pp. 1063-1072
-
-
Bornemann-Cimenti, H.1
Szilagyi, I.S.2
Sandner-Kiesling, A.3
-
5
-
-
81555195654
-
Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008
-
Sep, Epub 2011 Apr 12
-
Wager E, Williams P. Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008. J Med Ethics. 2011 Sep;37(9):567-70. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
-
(2011)
J Med Ethics
, vol.37
, Issue.9
, pp. 567-570
-
-
Wager, E.1
Williams, P.2
-
6
-
-
84874560742
-
Exploring why and how journal editors retract articles: Findings from a qualitative study
-
Mar, Epub 2011 Jul 15
-
Williams P, Wager E. Exploring why and how journal editors retract articles: findings from a qualitative study. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Mar;19(1):1-11. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
-
(2013)
Sci Eng Ethics
, vol.19
, Issue.1
, pp. 1-11
-
-
Williams, P.1
Wager, E.2
-
7
-
-
84897877612
-
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?
-
Jul 8
-
Steen RG, Casadevall A, Fang FC. Why has the number of scientific retractions increased? PLoS One. 2013 Jul 8;8(7):e68397.
-
(2013)
PLoS One
, vol.8
, Issue.7
, pp. e68397
-
-
Steen, R.G.1
Casadevall, A.2
Fang, F.C.3
-
8
-
-
84956770571
-
Retracted publications within radiology journals
-
Feb
-
Rosenkrantz AB. Retracted publications within radiology journals. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Feb;206(2):231-5.
-
(2016)
AJR Am J Roentgenol
, vol.206
, Issue.2
, pp. 231-235
-
-
Rosenkrantz, A.B.1
-
9
-
-
68049122102
-
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
-
Jul, 21, Epub 2009 Jul 21
-
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
-
(2009)
PLoS Med
, vol.6
, Issue.7
, pp. e1000097
-
-
Moher, D.1
Liberati, A.2
Tetzlaff, J.3
Altman, D.G.4
-
10
-
-
85019943714
-
-
Accessed 2016 June 15
-
CiteFactor. Impact factor list 2015. 2016. http://www.citefactor.org/journalimpact- factor-list-2015.html. Accessed 2016 June 15.
-
(2016)
Impact Factor List 2015
-
-
-
11
-
-
85019966670
-
Editorial Opinion Consensus statement on the adoption of the COPE guidelines
-
Editorial Opinion Consensus statement on the adoption of the COPE guidelines. Am J Surg. 2010;200(1):1.
-
(2010)
Am J Surg
, vol.200
, Issue.1
, pp. 1
-
-
-
12
-
-
84860516409
-
-
Aug 10, Accessed 2016 Oct 20
-
Naik G. Mistakes in scientific studies surge. 2011 Aug 10 http://www.wsj. com/articles/SB10001424052702303627104576411850666582080. Accessed 2016 Oct 20.
-
(2011)
Mistakes in Scientific Studies Surge
-
-
Naik, G.1
-
13
-
-
41249092383
-
Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers
-
May
-
Trikalinos NA, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP. Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 May;61(5):464-70.
-
(2008)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.61
, Issue.5
, pp. 464-470
-
-
Trikalinos, N.A.1
Evangelou, E.2
Ioannidis, J.P.3
-
14
-
-
84963553715
-
Ending the citation of retracted papers
-
Jun, Epub 2016 Apr 7
-
Cosentino AM, Veríssimo D. Ending the citation of retracted papers. Conserv Biol. 2016 Jun;30(3):676-8. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
-
(2016)
Conserv Biol
, vol.30
, Issue.3
, pp. 676-678
-
-
Cosentino, A.M.1
Veríssimo, D.2
|