Comparative review of five sustainable rating systems

Procedia Engineering

Volumn 21, Issue , 2011, Pages 376-386

  Nguyen, Binh K ^a   Altan, Hasim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment tools; Building sustainability; Rating systems; Sustainability methods

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ASSESSMENT TOOL; RATING SYSTEM; REVIEW PROCESS;

RATING;

EID: 84255192335     PISSN: 18777058     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2029     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Nguyen BK. TPSI - Tall-building Projects Sustainability Indicator. PhD thesis. The University of Sheffield; 2011 (In Press).
2. Fowler KM, Rauch EM. Sustainable Building Rating Systems Summary. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory - U.S. Department of Energy; 2006.
3. Hirigoyen J, Ratcliffe S, Davey-Attlee F. Green building rating systems: going beyond the labels. Jones Lang LaSalle; 2008.
4. Reed R, Bilos A, Wilkinson S, Shulte KW. International comparison of sustainable ratingtools. JOSRE 2009;1.
5. n/a. Building rating systems (certification programs): A comparison of key programs. Air Quality Sciences Inc.; 2006.
6. n/a. BEAM Plus New Buildings Version 1.1. HK-BEAM Society; 2010.
7. n/a. BREEAM Offices 2008 Assessor Manual. BRE Global Ltd; 2010
8. n/a. CASBEE for New Construction Technical Manual 2008 Edition. IBEC; 2008.
9. n/a. GREEN STAR Technical Manual. Green Building Council Australia; 2009.
10. n/a. LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations. USGBC; 2009.
11. Smith S. Untangling the Rating Systems. AIA; 2010.
12. Buttler M, Stoy C. Comparing the benefit of international assessemnt methods. ERES Conference Report; 2009.