A new approach for the application of nearly zero energy concept at district level to reach EPBD recast requirements through a case study in Turkey

Energy and Buildings

Volumn 152, Issue , 2017, Pages 680-700

  Kalaycıoğlu, Ece ^a   Yılmaz, A Zerrin ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

District energy systems; EPBD Cost optimal methodology; Nearly zero energy levels

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; COSTS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; INTERNATIONAL LAW; INVESTMENTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEMS; EFFICIENCY CALCULATIONS; ENERGY PERFORMANCE; EPBD COST OPTIMAL METHODOLOGY; EUROPEAN COMMISSION; EUROPEAN UNION DIRECTIVE; RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS; RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES;

ZERO ENERGY BUILDINGS;

EID: 85027493152     PISSN: 03787788     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.07.040     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. European Commission, EU Energy in Figures, Statistical Pocketbook 2016.
2. European Commission Climate Strategies & Targets. Available online at (08.03.2017): http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies_en.
3. EU, Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (recast). Off. J. Eur. Union, 2010, 13–35, 10.3000/17252555.L_2010.153.eng.
4. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, Building Energy Performance Regulation, Official Gazette, 27075, 2008 and Official Gazette, 27539, 2010 (in Turkish).
5. Declaration of National Building Energy Performance Calculation Methodology (Binalarda Enerji Performansı Ulusal Hesaplama Yöntemine Dair Tebliğ), YİG/2010-02, Official Gazette, 27778, 2010 (in Turkish).
6. Becchio, C., Bottero, M.C., Corgnati, S.P., Ghiglione, C., nZEB design: challenging between energy and economic targets; 6th International Building Physics Conference, IBPC 2015. Energy Procedia 78 (2015), 2070–2075.
7. Ferrara, M., Fabrizio, E., Virgone, J., Filippi, M., Appraising the effect of the primary systems on the cost optimal design of nZEB: a case study in two different climates; 6th International Building Physics Conference, IBPC 2015. Energy Procedia 78 (2015), 2028–2033.
8. Lindberg, K.B., Fischer, D., Doorman, G., Korpås, M., Sartori, I., Cost-optimal energy system design in Zero Energy Buildings with resulting grid impact: a case study of a German multi-family house. Energy Build. 127 (2016), 830–845.
9. Seljom, P., Byskov Lindberg, K., Tomasgard, A., Doorman, G., Sartori, I., The impact of Zero Energy Buildings on the Scandinavian energy system. Energy 118 (2017), 284–296.
10. Ballarini, I., Corgnati, S.P., Corrado, V., Use of reference buildings to assess the energy saving potentials of the residential building stock: the experience of TABULA project. Energy Policy 68 (2014), 273–284.
11. EE Project TABULA (2009–2012). Available online at (08.03.2017): http://episcope.eu/iee-project/tabula/.
12. Intelligent Energy Europe Project EPISCOPE. Available online at (08.03.2017): http://episcope.eu/index.php?id=170.
13. Aelenei, L., Petran, H., Tarrés, J., Riva, G., Ferreira, A., Camelo, S., Corrado, V., Šijanec-Zavrl, M., Stegnar, G., Gonçalves, H., Magyar, Z., Salom, J., Polychroni, E., Sfakianaki, K., New challenge of the public buildings: nZEB findings from IEE RePublic_ZEB Project; 6th International Building Physics Conference, IBPC 2015. Energy Procedia 78 (2015), 2016–2021.
14. Aelenei, L., Paduos, S., Petran, H., Tarrés, J., Ferreira, A., Corrado, V., Camelo, S., Polychroni, E., Sfakianaki, K., Gonçalves, H., Salom, J., Riva, G., Murano, G., Implementing cost-optimal methodology in existing public buildings; 6th International Building Physics Conference, IBPC 2015. Energy Procedia 78 (2015), 2022–2027.
15. Intelligent Energy Europe Project RePublic ZEB. Available online at (08.03.2017): http://www.republiczeb.org/index.jsp.
16. D'Agostino, D., Assessment of the progress towards the establishment of definitions of Nearly Zero Energy Buildings (nZEBs) in European Member States. J. Build. Eng. 1 (2015), 20–32.
17. Sala, M., Carta, A., Sustainable Buildings in Mediterranean Area (Chapter 11); Sustainability, Energy and Architecture, Case Studies in Realizing Green Buildings. 2013, 289–329.
18. CEN. [European Committee for Standardization]; Energy Performance of Buildings—Overall Energy Use and Definition of Energy Ratings; Standard EN 15603:2008.
19. Ascione, F., De Masi, R.F., de Rossi, F., Ruggiero, S., G.P. Vanoli, Optimization of building envelope design for nZEBs in Mediterranean climate: performance analysis of residential case study. Appl. Energy 183 (2016), 938–957.
20. Panão, M.J.O., Rebelo, M.P., Cameloa, S.M.L., How low should be the energy required by a nearly Zero-Energy Building? The load/generation energy balance of Mediterranean housing. Energy Build. 61 (2013), 161–171.
21. Gaitani, N., Cases, L., Mastrapostoli, E., Eliopoulou, E., Paving the way to nearly zero energy schools in Mediterranean region-ZEMedS project; 6th International Building Physics Conference, IBPC 2015. Energy Procedia 78 (2015), 3348–3353.
22. Ganiç, N., Yılmaz, A.Z., Adaptation of the cost optimal level calculation method of Directive 2010/31/EU considering the influence of Turkish national factors. Appl. Energy 123 (2014), 94–107.
23. Ganiç, N., Yılmaz, A.Z., Progress towards EPBD recast targets in Turkey: application of cost optimality calculations to a residential building; 6th International Building Physics Conference, IBPC 2015. Energy Procedia 78 (2015), 973–978.
24. Ashrafian, T., Yilmaz, A.Z., Corgnati, S.P., Moazzen, N., Methodology to define cost-optimal level of architectural measures for energy efficient retrofits of existing detached residential buildings in Turkey. Energy Build. 120 (2016), 58–77.
25. A.Z. Yilmaz, T. Ashrafian, N. Ganic, G. Gali, A. Akguc, Determination of Turkish Reference Residential Buildings and National Method for Defining Cost Optimum Energy Efficiency Level of Buildings, Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK), 2015, Project no:113M596.
26. Rezaie, B., Rosen, M.A., District heating and cooling: review of technology and potential enhancements. Appl. Energy 93 (2012), 2–10.
27. Lake, A., Rezaie, B., Beyerlein, S., Review of district heating and cooling systems for a sustainable future. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 67 (2017), 417–425.
28. Joelsson, A., Gustavsson, L., District heating and energy efficiency in detached houses of differing size and construction. Appl. Energy 86 (2009), 126–134.
29. Rodriguez-Aumente, P.A., del Carmen Rodriguez-Hidalgo, M., Nogueira, J.I., Lecuona, A., del Carmen Venegas, M., District heating and cooling for business buildings in Madrid. Appl. Therm. Eng. 50 (2013), 1496–1503.
30. Paiho, S., Reda, F., Towards next generation district heating in Finland. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 65 (2016), 915–924.
31. Lake, A., Rezaie, B., Bayerlein, S., Review of district heating and cooling systems for a sustainable future. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 67 (2017), 417–425.
32. Aguacil, S., Lufkin, S., Rey, E., Cuchi, A., Application of the cost-optimal methodology to urban renewal projects at the territorial scale base on statistical data—a case study in Spain. Energy Build. 144 (2017), 42–60.
33. Byskov Lindberg, K., Doorman, G., Fischer, D., Korpås, M., Ånestad, A., Sartori, I., Methodology for optimal energy system design of Zero Energy Buildings using mixed-integer linear programming. Energy Build. 127 (2016), 194–205.
34. Nielsen, S., Möller, B., Excess heat production of future net zero energy buildings within district heating areas in Denmark. Energy 48 (2012), 23–31.
35. Oktay, Z., Aslan, A., Geothermal district heating in Turkey: the Gonen case study. Geothermics 36 (2007), 167–182.
36. Yürüsoy, M., Keçebaş, A., Advanced exergo-environmental analyses and assessments of a real district heating system with geothermal energy. Appl. Therm. Eng. 113 (2017), 449–459.
37. Keçebaş, A., Coşkun, C., Oktay, Z., Hepbaşlı, A., Comparing advanced exergetic assessments of two geothermal district heating systems for residential buildings. Energy Build. 81 (2014), 141–151.
38. Hepbaşlı, A., Çanakçı, C., Geothermal district heating applications in Turkey: a case study of Izmir-Balcova. Energy Convers. Manage. 44 (2003), 1285–1301.
39. Erdogmus, B., Toksoy, M., Ozerdem, B., Aksoy, N., Economic assessment of geothermal district heating systems: a case study of Balcova–Narlidere, Turkey. Energy Build. 38 (2006), 1053–1059.
40. Cost optimal building performance requirements Calculation methodology for reporting on national energy performance requirements on the basis of cost optimality within the framework of the EPBD; European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, May 2011.
41. CEN. [European Committee for Standardization]; Energy Efficiency for Buildings—Standard economic evaluation procedure for energy systems in buildings; Standard EN 15459:2007.
42. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, General Management of Urban Transformation and Infrastructure Services; Development of Ecological Settlement Standard and Pilot Scheme Implementation in Eskişehir, Odunpazari District, Kocakir Site, 2015.
43. TSE. (Turkish Standards Institution) Binalarda Isı Yalıtım Kuralları Standardı (Thermal Insulation Requirements for Buildings), TS 825, ICS 91.120.10 Ankara, TSE, 2013 (in Turkish).
44. ASHRAE Standard 90.1–2007, Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings, SI Edition; ISSN 1041-2336, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., 2007.
45. Designbuilder Energy Simulation Software Web Site. Available online at (08.03.2017): https://www.designbuilder.co.uk/.
46. EnergyPlus Energy Simulation Software Web Site. Available online at (08.03.2017): http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus/.
47. EnergyPro Energy Modelling Software Web Site. Available online at (08.03.2017): http://www.emd.dk/energypro/.
48. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, Directorate of High Techniques Board; 2015 Yılı İnşaat ve Tesisat Birim Fiyatları (Construction and Facility Unit Prices of 2015), 2015 (in Turkish).