The importance of institutions and policy settings for car sharing – Evidence from the UK, Israel, Sweden and Finland

European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 340-359

  Akyelken, Nihan ^a   Givoni, Moshe ^b   Salo, Marja ^c   Plepys, Andrius ^a,d   Judl, Jáchym ^c   Anderton, Karen ^a,d   Koskela, Sirkka ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^c FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^d LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Car sharing; Institutions; Sustainable mobility; Transport governance

Indexed keywords

BINARY ALLOYS; POPULATION STATISTICS; POTASSIUM ALLOYS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URANIUM ALLOYS; URBAN GROWTH;

CONSUMER DEMANDS; EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL; SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY; TRANSPORT DEMAND; TRANSPORT GOVERNANCE; TRANSPORT SYSTEMS; URBAN POPULATION;

URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 85053721211     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15677141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18757/ejtir.2018.18.4.3253     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Akyelken, N. et al., 2014. Mobility Sector Report. Deliverable 5.1. SPREE Project, Oxford.
2. Akyelken, N. & Anderton, K., 2015. Mobility Sector in the UK. Deliverable 7.1.4 SPREE Project, Oxford.
3. Akyelken, N., Banister, D. & Givoni, M., 2018. The sustainability of shared mobility in London: The dilemma for governance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(2).
4. 2 emissions in the UK by 2030. Transport Policy 14(5), pp. 377-387.
5. Bardhi, F. & Eckhardt, G.M., 2012. Access based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), pp.881-898.
6. Becker, H., Ciari, F. & Axhausen, K.W., 2017. Comparing car-sharing schemes in Switzerland: User groups and usage patterns. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 97, pp.17-29.
7. Car Club Coalition, 2015. A car club strategy for London growing car clubs to support London’s transport future. Car Club Coalition: London. Available online at: http://content.tfl.gov.uk/tfl-car-club-strategy.pdf
8. Cervero, R., Golub, A. & Nee, B., 2007. San Francisco City CarShare: Longer-term travel-demand and car ownership impacts. University of California at Berkeley: California. Available online at: https://iurd.berkeley.edu/wp/2006-07.pdf
9. Cervero, R. & Tsai, Y., 2003. City CarShare in San Francisco, California: Second-year travel demand and car ownership impacts. University of California at Berkeley: California.Available online at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.361.492&rep=rep1&type=pdf
10. Chen, T.D. & Kockelman, K.M., 2016. Carsharing’s life-cycle impacts on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 47, pp.276-284.
11. Chen, T.D., Kockelman, K.M. & Hanna, J.P., 2016. Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric vehicle fleet: Implications of vehicle & charging infrastructure decisions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, pp.243-254.
12. City of Helsinki, 2014. City of Helsinki parking policy (In Finnish: Helsingin pysäköintipolitiikka), Available online at: https://www.hel.fi/hel2/ksv/julkaisut/los_2013-1.pdf.
13. Clewlow, R.R., 2016. Carsharing and sustainable travel behavior: Results from the San Francisco Bay Area. Transport Policy, 51, pp.158-164.
14. Cohen-Blankshtain, G., 2008. Framing transport-environmental policy: The case of company car taxation in Israel. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 13(2), pp.65-74.
15. Corbin, J. & Strauss, A., 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publications.
16. Dowling, R. & Kent, J., 2015. Practice and public-private partnerships in sustainable transport governance: The case of car sharing in Sydney, Australia. Transport Policy, 40, pp.58-64.
17. Efthymiou, D., Antoniou, C. & Waddell, P., 2013. Factors affecting the adoption of vehicle sharing systems by young drivers. Transport Policy, 29, pp.64-73.
18. Fagnant, D.J. & Kockelman, K.M., 2014. The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 40, pp.1-13.
19. Feitelson, E., Givoni, M. & Matt, E., 2013. Policy packaging and its applicability to servicizing: A summary of a concept. Deliverable 2.1. SPREE Project, Tel Aviv.
20. Fellows, N.T. & Pitfield, D.E., 2000. An economic and operational evaluation of urban car-sharing. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 5(1), pp.1-10.
21. Finnish Government, 2015. Implementation of the government programme. Available online at: http://valtioneuvosto.fi/en/implementation-of-the-government-programme.
22. Finnish Ministry of Transport and Communications, 2011. Helsinki Region congestion charges – summary and conclusions. Available online at: https://www.lvm.fi/en/publications_series.
23. Givoni, M., 2013. Alternative pathways to low-carbon mobility. In: Givoni, M. & Banister, D. (Eds.) Towards Low Carbon Mobility. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 209-230.
24. Givoni, M. et al., 2013. From policy measures to policy packages. Transport Reviews, 33(1), pp.1-20.
25. Givoni, M. & Banister, D., 2010. The need for integration in transport policy and practice. In: In: Givoni, M. & Banister, D. (Eds.) Integrated Transport: From Policy to Practice. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1-11.
26. Greater London Authority, 2018. Mayor’s Transport Strategy 2018. Greater London Authority: London. Available online at: https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/mayors-transport-strategy-2018.pdf.
27. Grush, B., Niles, J. & Baum, E., 2016. Ontario must prepare for vehicle automation: Automated vehicles can influence urban form, congestion and infrastructure delivery. RCCAO: Toronto. Available online at: http://rccao.com/research/files/RCCAO_Vehicle-Automation_OCT2016_WEB.pdf
28. Harmer, C. & Cairns, S., 2012. Carplus annual survey of car clubs 2011-12-London. Transport Research Laboratory: London. Available online at: https://trl.co.uk/sites/default/files/PPR612.pdf
29. Helsinki City Planning Department, 2016. Helsinki City Plan. Available online at: http://www.yleiskaava.fi/en/city-plan/.
30. Helsinki Region Transport (2015). A summary of the Helsinki region Transport System Plan 2015. Available online at: https://www.hsl.fi/sites/default/files/uploads/hlj_2015_summary_0.pdf.
31. Hickman, R. & Banister, D., 2014. Transport, Climate Change and the City. London: Routledge.
32. Katzev, R., 2003. Car sharing: A new approach to urban transportation problems. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3(1), pp.65-86.
33. Kivimaa, P. & Virkamäki, V., 2014. Policy mixes, policy interplay and low carbon transitions: The case of passenger transport in Finland. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(1), pp.28-41.
34. Le Vine, S. & Polak, J., 2015. Introduction to special issue: new directions in shared-mobility research. Transportation, 42(3), pp.407-411.
35. Le Vine, S. & Polak, J., 2017. The impact of free-floating carsharing on car ownership: Early-stage findings from London. Transport Policy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.02.004
36. Legacy, C., 2017. The post-politics of transport: establishing a new meeting ground for transport politics. Geographical Research, 56(2), pp. 196-205.
37. Malmö Stad, 2010. Parking policy and parking norm for cars, motorcycles and bicycles in Malmö (In Swedish: Parkeringspolicy och Parkeringsnorm för bil, mc och cykel i Malmö. September 2010). Malmö City Available online at: http://malmo.se/download/18.4027ea8b12af75326fc80003800/1383644417068/Parkeringspolicy +och+parkeringsnorm+slutligt+förslag+antagen+av+KF.pdf
38. Malmö Stad, 2015a. RTI-plan – Regional plan for transport infrastructure in Scania 2014-2025 In Swedish: RTI-plan-Regional transportinfrastrukturplan för Skåne 2014-2025. Malmö City. Available online at: http://malmo.se/download/18.5bb0a05f145db1bc43d6ac4/1401438553855/OP2012_planstrateg i_antagen_140522.pdf
39. Malmö Stad, 2015b. Parking strategy (In Swedish: Parkingstrategi. Hyllie) Malmö City. Available online at: http://malmo.se/download/18.5f3af0e314e7254d70e3a17a/1440673319258/Parkeringsstrategi+ Hyllie.pdf
40. Martin, E., Shaheen, S. & Lidicker, J., 2010. Impact of carsharing on household vehicle holdings. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143, pp.150-158. Available online at: http://sfpark.org/wp-content/uploads/carshare/Impact_of_Carsharing_on_Household_Vehicle_Holdings.pdf
41. Millard-Ball, A. et al., 2005. Car-Sharing: Where and how it succeeds. Transit Cooperative Research Program: Washington, DC. Available online at: http://www.ccdcboise.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Document-D1-TCRP-Car-sharing-Where-and-How-It-Succeeds.pdf
42. Morgan, B. & Kuch, D., 2015. Radical transactionalism: Legal consciousness, diverse Economies, and the sharing economy. Journal of Law and Society, 42(4), pp.556-587.
43. Plepys, A., Heiskanen, E. & Mont, O., 2015. European policy approaches to promote servicizing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, pp.117-123.
44. Prettenthaler, F.E. & Steininger, K.W., 1999. From ownership to service use lifestyle: The potential of car sharing. Ecological Economics, 28(3), pp.443-453.
45. Prieto, M., Baltas, G. & Stan, V., 2017. Car sharing adoption intention in urban areas: What are the key sociodemographic drivers? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 101, pp.218-227.
46. Region Skåne. 2013. Regional transport and infrastructure plan for Scania. Regional authority for Scania (In Swedish: Regional transportinfrastrukturplan för Skåne 2014-2025). Available online at: http://www.skane.se/Public/Protokoll/Regionala%20tillväxtnämnden/2013-12-06/06%20Länsplan%20för%20transportinfrastruktur%20i%20Skåne%202014-2025/RTI-plan%202014-2025%2020131129.pdf
47. Rhode, P. & Hoffmann, C., 2014. Towards new urban mobility: The cases of London and Berlin. LSE Cities: London. Available online at: https://files.lsecities.net/files/2015/09/New-Urban-Mobility-London-and-Berlin.pdf.
48. Schaefers, T., 2013. Exploring carsharing usage motives: A hierarchical means-end chain analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 47, pp.69-77.
49. Shaheen, S.A. & Cohen, A.P., 2012. Carsharing and personal vehicle services: Worldwide market developments and emerging Trends. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7(1), pp.5-34.
50. Shaheen, S.A., Schwartz, A. & Wipyewski, K., 2004. Policy considerations for carsharing and station cars: Monitoring growth, trends, and overall impacts. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1887(1887), pp.128-136.
51. Shaheen, S. & Chan, N., 2016. Mobility and the sharing economy: Potential to facilitate the first-and last-mile public transit connections. Built Environment, 42(4), pp.573-588.
52. Shiftan, Y., Albert, G. & Keinan, T., 2012. The impact of company-car taxation policy on travel behavior. Transport Policy, 19(1), pp.139-146.
53. Skatteverlet, 2018a. Value-added tax levels for goods and services (In Swedish: Momssats på varor och tjänster). Skatteverket (Swedish Tax Authority): Stockholm. Available online at: https://www.skatteverket.se/foretagochorganisationer/moms/saljavarorochtjanster/momssats pavarorochtjanster.4.58d555751259e4d66168000409.html
54. Skatteverket, 2018b. Daily allowances and mileage compensation (In Swedish: Traktamente och bilersättning.) Skatteverket (Swedish Tax Authority): Stockholm. Available online at: https://www.skatteverket.se/privat/sjalvservice/blanketterbroschyrer/broschyrer/info/3156. 4.84f6651040cdcb1b480009532.html
55. Skjelvik, J., Erlandsen, A. & Haavardsholm, O., 2017. Environmental impacts and potential of the sharing economy. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. Available online at: http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1145502&dswid=3552
56. SKL, 2013. Parking for sustainable city development (In Swedish: Parkering för hållbar stadsutveckling). Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting (SKL)/Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions: Sweden. Available online at:: https://www.sunfleet.com/media/1190/7164-920-1.pdf
57. SOU, 2013. Fossil-free freedom on the way. State public investigation (In Swedish: Fossilfrihet på väg. Statens offentliga utredningar) Swedish Parliament: Stockholm. p. 1061
58. Statistics Finland, 2016. Population projection. Available online at: http://pxnet2.stat.fi/PXWeb/pxweb/en/StatFin/StatFin__vrm__vaenn/?tablelist=true, accessed: 8.5. 2018
59. Steer Davies Gleave, 2015. Carplus Annual Survey of Car Clubs London 2014-15. Steer Davies Gleave: London. Available online at: https://como.org.uk/shared-mobility/shared-cars/why/
60. Steer Davies Gleave, 2016. Carplus Annual Survey of Car Clubs London 2015-16. Steer Davies Gleave: London. Available online at: https://como.org.uk/shared-mobility/shared-cars/why/
61. Steer Davies Gleave, 2017. Carplus Annual Survey of Car Clubs London 2016-17. Steer Davies Gleave: London. Available online at: https://como.org.uk/shared-mobility/shared-cars/why/
62. Tapio, P., 2005. Towards a theory of decoupling: Degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transport Policy, 12(2), pp.137-151.
63. Toiskallio et al., 2013. Promotion of car sharing in the Helsinki region. Available online at: https://www.hsl.fi/sites/default/files/uploads/autojen_yhteiskayton_edistaminen_18_2013.pdf.
64. Trafikverket, 2013. Proposal for national plan of transport system 2014-2025 (In Swedish: Förslag till nationell plan för transportsystemet 2014-2025) Swedish Transport Administration: Sweden. Available online at: http://www.trafikverket.se/contentassets/9e147d1421b14ee9ae83003c9f15617c/forslag_till_nati onell_plan_for_transportsystemet_2014_2025_remissversion.pdf
65. Trafikanalys, 2016. Swedish public sector transport statistics. Available online at: http://www.trafa.se/kollektivtrafik/kollektivtrafik/.
66. Transport for London, 2008. Mayor’s Car Club Strategy 2008. Transport for London: London.
67. Transport for London, 2015. Road Task Force Progress Report 2015. Transport for London: London.
68. Transport for London, 2013. The vision and direction for London’s streets and roads: Road task force executive summary. Transport for London: London.
69. Truffer, B., 2003. User-led innovation processes: The development of professional car sharing by environmentally concerned citizens. Innovation, 16(2), pp.139-154.
70. Voltti (2010). Potential and impacts of car sharing in the capital region, Turku and Tampere (In Finnish: Autojen yhteiskäytön potentiaali ja vaikutukset pääkaupunkiseudulla, Turussa ja Tampereella). Finnish Transport Agency: Helsinki.