Factors affecting the adoption of vehicle sharing systems by young drivers

Transport Policy

Volumn 29, Issue , 2013, Pages 64-73

  Efthymiou, Dimitrios ^a,b   Antoniou, Constantinos ^a   Waddell, Paul ^c  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bike sharing; Car sharing; Factor analysis; Ordered logit; User perception

Indexed keywords

CAR OWNERSHIP; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CYCLE TRANSPORT; FACTOR ANALYSIS; INTERNET; LOGIT ANALYSIS; PARKING; PERCEPTION; SURVEY METHOD; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION POLICY; TRAVEL DEMAND; TRAVEL TIME;

GREECE;

EID: 84878264138     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Barth, M. and Shaheen, S., 2002. Shared vehicle systems: framework for classifying carsharing, station cars, and combined approaches. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1791, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp. 105-112.
2. Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S.R. Discrete Choice Analysis 1985, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985.
3. Burkhardt, J. Millard-Ball, A., 2006. Who's attracted to car-sharing? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1986, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp. 98-105.
4. Büttner, J., 2010. Planning a new bike sharing scheme. Making decisions based on previous experience. In: Proceedings of the Velo-City Global, Copenhagen.
5. Ciari, F., Balmer, M. Axhausen, K.W., 2009. Concepts for large scale car-sharing system: modelling and evaluation with an agent-based approach. In: Proceedings of the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC, January 2009.
6. Cohen, A., Shaheen, S. McKenzie R., 2008. Carsharing: A Guide for Local Planners, Research Report UCD-ITS-RP-08-16. Institute of Transportation Studies. University of California, Davis.
7. DeMaio P. Bike-sharing: its history, models of provision, and future. Journal of Public Transportation 2009, 12(4):41-56. accessed: January 2011. http://www.nctr.usf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/JPT12-4.pdf.
8. Dillman D., Smyth J.D., Christian M. Internet, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailired Design Method 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. third ed.
9. Dufour, D., Ligtermoet & Partners, 2010. PRESTO Cycling Policy Guide General Framework, Intelligent Energy, Europe. (Available online:) (accessed: 25.07.2011). http://www.presto-cycling.eu/en/policy-guidelines-a-fact-sheets.
10. European Environment Agency, 2010. Tracking Progress Towards Kyoto and 2020 targets in Europe. EEA Report 7.
11. European Road Safety Observatory, 2007. Traffic Safety Basic Facts: Motorcycles and Mopeds. (Available online:) (accessed: 30.05.2011). http://www.ec.europa.eu/transport/roadsafety_library-/care/doc/safetynet/2007/bfs2007_sn-swov-13-motorcycles_mopeds.pdf.
12. Hendriks, H., 2010. Idea contest: a method to capture the interest of professionals, local decision makers and to start the public discussion. In: Proceedings of the Velo-City Global. Copenhagen.
13. Lane, C., 2005. PhillyCarShare: first-year social and mobility impacts of carsharing in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1927, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp. 158-166.
14. Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archiv für Psychologie (Frankf) 1932, 55:140.
15. Litman, T.A., Pay-As-You-Drive Pricing for Insurance Affordability. Victoria Transport Policy Institute Report, 8 June 2011. (Available online:) (accessed: 21.07.2011). http://www.vtpi.org/payd_aff.pdf.
16. Loomis J.B. What's to know about hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation studies?. Journal of Economic Surveys 2011, 25(2):363-370.
17. Martin, E., Shaheen, S.A. Lidicker, J., 2010. Carsharings's impact on household vehicle holdings: results from a North American shared-use vehicle survey. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2143, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2010, pp. 150-158, January 2010.
18. McFadden D.L. Economic choices (revised version of nobel prize lecture). The American Economic Review 2001, 91(3):351-378.
19. Millard-Ball, A., Murray G., ter Schure J., Fox, C. Burkhardt J., 2005. Car-sharing: Where and how it Succeeds. Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report, 108.
20. Millard-Ball, A., Murray, G., ter Schure J.,. Car-sharing as a parking management strategy. In: Proceedings of the 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 2006.
21. Morency, C., Trépanier, M. Martin, B., 2008. Object-oriented analysis of a car sharing system. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2063, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp. 105-112.
22. Morrison, M., 2000. Aggregation biases in stated preference studies. Australian Economic Papers. 39(2), pp. 215-230.
23. Murphy J.J., Allen P.G., Stevens T.H., Weatherhead D. A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics 2005, 30:313-325.
24. Ohta, H., Fujii, S., Nishimura, Y. Kozuka, M., Psychological analysis of acceptance of pro-environmental use of automobile: cases for carsharing and eco-car. In: Proceedings of the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 2009.
25. Richardson, A.J., 2003. Simulation study of estimation of individual specific values of time using adaptive stated-preference study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1804, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp. 13-20.
26. Rodier, C. Shaheen S., 2004. Carsharing and carfree housing: predicted travel, emission, and economic benefits. A case study of the Sacramento, California region. In: Proceedings of the 83th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 2004.
27. Rodier, C. Shaheen, S., 2008. EasyConnect: Low-Speed Modes Linked to Transit Planning Project. California PATH Research Report. Research Report UCB-ITS-PRR-2008-17. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
28. Rodier, C., 2009. Review of the international modelling literature: transit, land use, and auto pricing strategies to reduce vehicle miles traveled and greenhouse gas emissions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2123, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp. 1-12.
29. Shaheen, S., A. Schwartz, Wipyewski K., 2004. Policy considerations for carsharing and station cars. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1887, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp. 128-136.
30. Shaheen, S., Cohen A., 2007. Growth in worldwide carsharing: an International comparison. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1992, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp. 81-89.
31. Shaheen, S., Martin, E., 2007. Assessing early market potential for carsharing in China: a case study of Beijing. In: Proceedings of the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 2007.
32. Shaheen, S., Cohen, A., Chung, M., 2009. North American Carsharing: A Ten-Year Retrospective. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2110, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp. 35-44.
33. Shaheen, S., Guzman, S., Zhanq, H., 2010a. Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas and Asia: Past, Present and Future. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2143, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp. 159-167.
34. Shaheen, S., Cohen, A.P. Martin, E., 2010b. Carsharing parking policy: review of North American practices and San Francisco Bay area case study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2187, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp. 146-156.
35. Shaheen, S., Rodier, C., Murray, G., Cohen, G. Martin E., 2010c. Carsharing and Public Parking Policies: Assessing Benefits, Costs, and Best Practicies in North America. Report CA-MTI-10-2612. Mineta Transportation Institute.
36. Shaheen, S., Hua, Z., Elliot, M. Guzman S., 2011. Hangzhou public bicycle: understanding early adoption and behavioral response to bikesharing in Hangzhou, China. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
37. Thaler R.H., Sunstein C.R. Nudge, Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness 2009, Penguin Books Ltd., London.
38. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2009, 2009. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. second ed.
39. Waddell P. UrbanSim: modelling urban development for land use, transportation and environmental planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 2002, 68(3):297-314.
40. Walsh M. Global trends in motor vehicle use and emissions. Annual Review of Energy 1990, 15:217-243.
41. Washington S.P., Karlaftis M.G., Mannering F.L. Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis 2003, Chapman & Hall/CRC, London.
42. Zhou B., Kockelman K., Gao R. Opportunities for and impacts of carsharing: a survey of the Austin, Texas market. International Journal of Sustainable Transport 2011, 5(3):135-152.