Integrated versus nOn-integrated Peripheral inTravenous catheter. Which Is the most effective systeM for peripheral intravenoUs catheter Management? (The OPTIMUM study): A randomised controlled trial protocol

BMJ Open

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2018, Pages

  Castillo, Maria Isabel ^a   Larsen, Emily ^a,b   Cooke, Marie ^a   Marsh, Nicole M ^a,b   Wallis, Marianne C ^a,c   Finucane, Julie ^a,d   Brown, Peter ^a,d   Mihala, Gabor ^a   Carr, Peter J ^a,e   Byrnes, Joshua ^a   Walker, Rachel ^a,f   Cable, Prudence ^d   Zhang, Li ^a   Sear, Candi ^a,d   Jackson, Gavin ^a,e   Rowsome, Anna ^a,d   Ryan, Alison ^d   Humphries, Julie C ^d   Sivyer, Susan ^d   Flanigan, Kathy ^d   Rickard, Claire M ^a,b,f   more..

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b ROYAL BRISBANE AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE SUNSHINE COAST   (Australia)

^d QUEEN ELIZABETH II JUBILEE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^e FIONA STANLEY HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^f PRINCESS ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

catheter failure; cost effectiveness; integrated intravenous system; peripheral intravenous catheter; randomized controlled trial

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CATHETER INFECTION; CATHETER OCCLUSION; CLINICAL OUTCOME; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DEVICE COMPARISON; DEVICE FAILURE; DISLODGEMENT; DWELL TIME; EXTRAVASATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; PHLEBITIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; THROMBOPHLEBITIS; AUSTRALIA; CATHETERIZATION; DEVICE REMOVAL; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE COST; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); PROCEDURES; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

AUSTRALIA; CATHETER-RELATED INFECTIONS; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; DEVICE REMOVAL; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85053115472     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019916     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Zingg W, Pittet D. Peripheral venous catheters: An under-evaluated problem. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009;34:S38-42.
2. Bolton D. Improving peripheral cannulation practice at an NHS Trust. Br J Nurs 2010;19:1346-50.
3. Rickard CM, Webster J, Wallis MC, et al. Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: A randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet 2012;380:1066-74.
4. Rickard CM, Marsh N, Webster J, et al. Securing All intraVenous devices Effectively in hospitalised patients - The SAVE trial: Study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2015;5:e008689.
5. González López JL, Arribi Vilela A, Fernández del Palacio E, et al. Indwell times, complications and costs of open vs closed safety peripheral intravenous catheters: A randomized study. J Hosp Infect 2014;86:117-26.
6. Loveday HP, Wilson JA, Pratt RJ, et al. epic3: national evidencebased guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England. J Hosp Infect 2014;86:S1-S70.
7. Gorski LA. The 2016 infusion therapy standards of practice. Home Healthc Now 2017;35:10-18.
8. Infusion Nurses Society. Infusion nursing standards of practice. J Infus Nurs 2006;29:S1-92.
9. Beckton, Dickinson, Company. BD Nexiva TM Closed IV catheter system. https://www. bd. com/ en- ca/ products/ medical- surgicalsystems/ infusion- therapy/ iv- access/ nexiva- closed- iv- cathetersystem (accessed Feb 2018).
10. Sealed Envelope™. Power calculator for binary outcome superiority trial. https://www. sealedenvelope. com/ power/ binary- superiority/ (accessed Feb 2018).
11. Helm RE, Klausner JD, Klemperer JD, et al. Accepted but unacceptable: Peripheral IV catheter failure. J Infus Nurs 2015;38:189-203.
12. Webster J, Osborne S, Rickard CM, et al. Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;8:CD007798.
13. Hadaway LC. I.V. infiltration: Not just a peripheral problem. Nursing 1999;29:41-7.
14. Marsh N, Webster J, Mihala G, et al. Devices and dressings to secure peripheral venous catheters to prevent complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:CD011070.
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC/NHSN Surveillance definitions for specific types of infections. 2017 https://www. cdc. gov/ nhsn/ pdfs/ pscmanual/ 17pscnosinfdef- current. pdf (accessed Feb 2018).
16. Griffith University. Griffith randomisation service. https:// www151. griffith. edu. au/ (accessed Feb 2018).
17. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377-81.
18. Aitken LM, Mardegan KJ. "Thinking aloud": Data collection in the natural setting. West J Nurs Res 2000;22:841-53.
19. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res 2011;20:1727-36.
20. Peipert JD, Beaumont JL, Bode R, et al. Development and validation of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy treatment satisfaction (FACIT TS) measures. Qual Life Res 2014;23:815-24.
21. Norwood SL. Research strategies for advanced practice nurses. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall Health, 2000.
22. Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med 1977;296:1305-9.
23. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2015.
24. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. 2010 https:// evs. nci. nih. gov/ ftp1/ CTCAE/ CTCAE- 4. 03- 2010- 06- 14- QuickReference- 5x7. pdf (accessed Feb 2018).
25. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Preparing for submission secondary preparing for submission. 2017 http:// www. icmje. org/ recommendations/ browse/ manuscript- preparation/ preparing- for- submission. html (accessed Feb 2018).