Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2019, Issue 1, 2019, Pages

  Webster, Joan ^a,b,c   Osborne, Sonya ^d   Rickard, Claire M ^a   Marsh, Nicole ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c ROYAL BRISBANE AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATHETER INFECTION; CATHETER OCCLUSION; COMMUNITY DWELLING PERSON; DEVICE REMOVAL; DEVICE SAFETY; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INFUSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THROMBOPHLEBITIS; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADVERSE DEVICE EFFECT; CATHETERIZATION; DEVICES; ECONOMICS; INDWELLING CATHETER; PHLEBITIS; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; STANDARDS; TIME FACTOR;

CATHETER-RELATED INFECTIONS; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; DEVICE REMOVAL; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; PHLEBITIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; THROMBOPHLEBITIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85060391312     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469493X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007798.pub5     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Barker P, Anderson AD, Macfie J. Randomised clinical trial of elective re-siting of intravenous cannulae. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2004;86(4):281-3. 3182338
2. Nishanth S, Sivaram G, Kalayarasan R, Kate V, Ananthakrishnan N. Does elective re-siting of intravenous cannulae decrease peripheral thrombophlebitis? A randomized controlled study. The International Medical Journal of India 2009;22(2):60-2. 3182340
3. Rickard CM, McCann D, Munnings J, McGrail M. Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated re-site: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Medicine 2010;8:53. 3182342
4. Rickard CM. Clinically indicated and routine replacement of peripheral IV catheters did not differ for phlebitis. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013;158:JC8. Ref ID:81. 3182345
5. Rickard CM, Webster J, Wallis MC, Marsh N, McGrail MR, French V, et al. Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised equivalence trial. Lancet 2012;380(9847):1066-74. 3182344
6. Tuffaha HW, Rickard CM, Webster J, Marsh N, Gordon L, Wallis M, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of clinically indicated versus routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters. Applied Economics and Health Policy 2014;12:51-8. 3182346
7. Van Donk P, Rickard CM, McGrail MR, Doolan G. Routine replacement versus clinical monitoring of peripheral intravenous catheters in a regional hospital in the home program: a randomized controlled trial. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2009;30(9):915-7. 3182348
8. Vendramim P. ResPeCt- removal of peripheral intravenous catheters according to clinical signs or every 96 hours: randomized, controlled and non-inferiority trial. Unpublished (final communication with trial author 1 August 2018). 9889773
9. Webster J, Lloyd S, Hopkins T, Osborne S, Yaxley M. Developing a research base for intravenous peripheral cannula re-sites (DRIP trial). A randomised controlled trial of hospital in-patients. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2007;44(5):664-71. 3182350
10. Webster J, Clarke S, Paterson D, Hutton A, Van Dyke S, Gale C, et al. Routine care of peripheral intravenous catheters versus clinically indicated replacement: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008;337:a339. 3182352
11. Xu L, Hu Y, Huang X, Fu J, Zhang J. Clinically indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters in adults: a nonblinded, cluster-randomized trial in China. International Journal of Nursing Practice 2017;23:doi: 10.1111/ijn.12595. 9889775
12. Arnold RE, Elliot EK, Holmes BH. The importance of frequent examination of infusion sites in preventing postinfusion phlebitis. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics 1977;145(1):19-20. 3182354
13. Cobb DK, High KP, Sawyer RG, Sable CA, Adams RB, Lindley DA, et al. A controlled trial of scheduled replacement of central venous and pulmonary-artery catheters. New England Journal of Medicine 1992;327(15):1062-8. 3182356
14. Eyer S, Brummitt C, Crossley K, Siegel R, Cerra F. Catheter-related sepsis: prospective, randomized study of three methods of long-term catheter maintenance. Critical Care Medicine 1990;18(10):1073-9. 3182358
15. Haddad FG, Waked CH, Zein EF. Peripheral venous catheter inflammation. A randomized prospective trial. Le Journal Médical Libanais 2006;54:139-45. 3182360
16. Kerin MJ, Pickford IR, Jaeger H, Couse NF, Mitchell CJ, Macfie J. A prospective and randomised study comparing the incidence of infusion phlebitis during continuous and cyclic peripheral parenteral nutrition. Clinical Nutrition 1991;10(6):315-9. 3182362
17. May J, Murchan P, MacFie J, Sedman P, Donat P, Palmer D, et al. Prospective study of the aetiology of infusion phlebitis and line failure during peripheral parenteral nutrition. British Journal of Surgery 1996;83(8):1091-4. 3182364
18. Nakae H, Igarashi T, Tajimi K. Catheter-related infections via temporary vascular access catheters: a randomized prospective study. Artificial Organs 2010;34(3):E72-6. 3182366
19. Panadero A, Iohom G, Taj J, Mackay N, Shorten G. A dedicated intravenous cannula for postoperative use. Effect on incidence and severity of phlebitis. Anaesthesia 2002;57(9):921-5. 3182368
20. Rijnders BJ, Peetermans WE, Verwaest C, Wilmer A, Van Wijngaerden E. Watchful waiting versus immediate catheter removal in ICU patients with suspected catheter-related infection: a randomized trial. Intensive Care Medicine 2004;30(6):1073-80. 3182370
21. Chin LY, Walsh TA, Van Haltren K, Hayden L, Davies-Tuck M, Malhotra A. Elective replacement of intravenous cannula in newborn infants: a randomised control trial. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2018;54(Suppl 1):12. 9889777
22. Abolfotouh MA, Salam M, Bani-Mustafa A, White D, Balkhy HH. Prospective study of incidence and predictors of peripheral intravenous catheter-induced complications. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 2014;10:993-1001.
23. Bolton D. Clinically indicated replacement of peripheral cannulas. British Journal of Nursing 2015;24:S4-S12.
24. Bregenzer T, Conen D, Sakmann P, Widmer AF. Is routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters necessary?. Archives of Internal Medicine 1998;158:51-6.
25. Catney MR, Hillis S, Wakefield B, Simpson L, Domino L, Keller S, et al. Relationship between peripheral intravenous catheter dwell time and the development of phlebitis and infiltration. Journal of Infusion Nursing 2001;24(5):332-41.
26. Cornely OA, Bethe U, Pauls R, Waldschmidt D. Peripheral Teflon catheters: factors determining incidence of phlebitis and duration of cannulation. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2002;23:249-53.
27. De Vries M, Valentine M, Mancos P. Protected clinical indication of peripheral intravenous lines: successful implementation. Journal of the Association of Vascular Access 2016;21:89-92.
28. Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG (editors) on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JP, Churchill R, Chandler J, Cumpston MS (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.2.0 (updated June 2017), Cochrane, 2017. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook.
29. Everitt NJ, Krupowicz DW, Evans JA, McMahon MJ. Ultrasonographic investigation of the pathogenesis of infusion thrombophlebitis. British Journal of Surgery 1997;84:642-5.
30. Gahlot R, Nigam C, Kumar V, Yadav G, Anupurba S. Catheter-related bloodstream infections. International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science 2014;4:162-7.
31. Gorski L, Hadaway L, Hagle ME, McGoldrick M, Orr M, Doellman D. Infusion therapy standards of practice. Journal of Infusion Nursing 2016;39:S91.
32. Hadaway L. Short peripheral intravenous catheters and infections. Journal of Infusion Nursing 2012;35(4):230-40.
33. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-60.
34. Higgins JP, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 16: Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
35. Higgins JP, Deeks JJ (editors). Chapter 7: Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
36. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Sterne JA (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Churchill R, Chandler J, Cumpston MS (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.2.0 (updated June2017), Cochrane, 2017. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook.
37. Ho KHM, Cheung DSK. Guidelines on timing in replacing peripheral intravenous catheters. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2011;21(11-12):1499-506.
38. Homer LD, Holmes KR. Risks associated with 72- and 96-hour peripheral intravenous catheter dwell times. Journal of Intravenous Nursing 1998;21:301-5.
39. Infusion Nurses Society. Infusion Nursing Standards of Practice. Journal of Infusion Nursing 2011;34(1S):S57.
40. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
41. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.
42. Loveday HP, Wilson JA, Pratt RJ, Golsorkhi M, Tingle A, Bak A, et al. epic3: National Evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections. Journal of Hospital Infection 2014;86 Suppl 1:S1-70.
43. Maddox RR, Rush DR, Rapp RP, Foster TS, Mazella V, McKean HE. Double-blind study to investigate methods to prevent cephalothin-induced phlebitis. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 1977;34:29-34.
44. Maki DG, Ringer M. Risk factors for infusion-related phlebitis with small peripheral venous catheters. A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine 1991;114:845-54.
45. Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2006;81(9):1159-71.
46. Maki DG. Improving the safety of peripheral intravenous catheters. BMJ 2008;337(7662):122-3.
47. Marsh N, Webster J, Ullman A, Mihala G, Cooke M, Rickard CM. The incidence of peripheral intravenous catheter failure and complications within the adult population: a systematic review. BMJ 2018; Vol. (in editorial process).
48. Marsh N, Webster J, Larsen E, Cooke M, Mihala G, Rickard C. Observational study of peripheral intravenous catheter outcomes in adult hospitalized patients: a multivariable analysis of peripheral intravenous catheter failure. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2018;13:83-9.
49. Mermel LA. Short-term peripheral venous catheter-related blood stream infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2017;65(10):1757-62.
50. Monreal M, Quilez F, Rey-Joly C, Vega J, Torres T, Valero P, et al. Infusion phlebitis in patients with acute pneumonia: a prospective study. Chest 1999;115:1576-80.
51. Morrison K, Holt KE. The effectiveness of clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: an evidence review with implications for clinical practice. Worldviews Evidence Based Nursing 2015;12:187-98.
52. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, et al. 2011 Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. (accessed 23 August 2018).
53. Patel SA, Alebich MM, Feldman LS. Routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12:42-5.
54. Ray-Barruel G, Polit DF, Murfield JE, Rickard CM. Infusion phlebitis assessment measures: a systematic review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2014;20:191-202.
55. Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
56. Rickard CM, Webster J, Runnegar N, Larsen E, McGrail MR, Fullerton F, et al. Dressings and securements for the prevention of peripheral intravenous catheter failure in adults (SAVE): a pragmatic, randomised controlled, superiority trial. Lancet 2018;392:419-30. [DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31380-1]
57. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ, Glasziou P, et al. on behalf of the Cochrane Applicability and Recommendations Methods Group. Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In: Higgins JP, Churchill R, Chandler J, Cumpston MS (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.2.0 (updated June 2017). Cochrane, 2017. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook.
58. Sterne JA, Egger M, Moher D, Boutron I (editors). Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JP, Churchill R, Chandler J, Cumpston MS (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.2.0 (updated June 2017), Cochrane, 2017. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook.
59. Tan PC, Mackeen A, Khong SY, Omar SZ, Azmi MA. Peripheral intravenous catheterisation in obstetric patients in the hand or forearm vein: a randomised trial. Scientific reports 2016;6:23223.
60. Tuffaha HW, Rickard CM, Webster J, Marsh N, Gordon L, Wallis M, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of clinically indicated versus routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters. Applied Economics and Health Policy 2014;12:51-8.
61. Tuffaha HW, Rickard CM, Inwood S, Gordon L, Scuffham P. The epic3 recommendation that clinically indicated replacement of peripheral venous catheters is safe and cost-saving: how much would the NHS save?. Journal of Hospital Infection 2014;87(3):183-4.
62. Uslusoy E, Mete S. Predisposing factors to phlebitis in patients with peripheral intravenous catheters: a descriptive study. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 2008;20:172-80.
63. White SA. Peripheral intravenous therapy-related phlebitis rates in an adult population. Journal of Intravenous Nursing 2001;24:19-24.
64. Webster J, Osborne S, Hall J, Rickard C. Clinically indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007798]
65. Webster J, Osborne S, Rickard C, Hall J. Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007798.pub2]
66. Webster J, Osborne S, Rickard CM, New K. Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007798.pub3]
67. Webster J, Osborne S, Rickard CM, New K. Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007798.pub4]