Securing All intraVenous devices Effectively in hospitalised patients-the SAVE trial: Study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 9, 2015, Pages

  Rickard, Claire M ^a,b,c,d   Marsh, Nicole ^a,b   Webster, Joan ^a,b   Playford, E Geoffrey ^a,c   McGrail, Matthew R ^a,e   Larsen, Emily ^a,b   Keogh, Samantha ^a,b   McMillan, David ^a,f   Whitty, Jennifer A ^d   Choudhury, Md Abu ^a   Dunster, Kimble R ^d,g   Reynolds, Heather ^a,b   Marshall, Andrea ^a,h   Crilly, Julia ^a,h   Young, Jeanine ^a,f   Thom, Ogilvie ^d,i   Gowardman, John ^a,b   Corley, Amanda ^a,d   Fraser, John F ^a,d  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b ROYAL BRISBANE AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c PRINCESS ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT   (Australia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF THE SUNSHINE COAST   (Australia)

^g QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^h GOLD COAST UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Australia)

ⁱ NAMBOUR GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYURETHAN; TISSUE ADHESIVE; ADHESIVE AGENT;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DEVICE FAILURE; DEVICE INFECTION; DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OCCLUSION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIPHERAL INTRAVENOUS DEVICE; PHLEBITIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VASCULAR EQUIPMENT; ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BANDAGE; CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CROSS INFECTION; HOSPITALIZATION; INDWELLING CATHETER; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; METHODOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADHESIVES; ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVENOUS; ADULT; BANDAGES; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CROSS INFECTION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; PHLEBITIS; POLYURETHANES; RESEARCH DESIGN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84956955377     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008689     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bausone-Gazda D, Lefaiver CA, Walters C-A. A randomized controlled trial to compare the complications of 2 peripheral intravenous catheter-stabilization systems. J Infus Nurs 2010;33:371-84.
2. Zingg W, Pittet D. Peripheral venous catheters: an under-evaluated problem. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009;34(Suppl 4):S38-42.
3. Bolton D. Improving peripheral cannulation practice at an NHS Trust. Br J Nurs 2010;19:1346, 8-50.
4. Harwood IR, Greene LM, Kozakowski-Koch JA, et al. New peripherally inserted midline catheter: a better alternative for intravenous antibiotic therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 1992;12:233-9.
5. Wallis MC, McGrail MR, Webster J, et al. Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter failure: a multivariate analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:63-8.
6. Royer T. Improving short peripheral IV outcomes: a clinical trial of two securement methods. JAVA 2003;8:45-9.
7. Smith B. Peripheral intravenous catheter dwell times. A comparison of 3 securement methods for implementation of a 96-hour scheduled change protocol. J Infus Nurs 2006;29:14-17.
8. Ezingeard E, Coudrot M, Guyomarc'h S, et al. Evaluation of colonisation of peripheral venous catheters inserted by prehospital emergency service teams (SMUR) in France. J Hosp Infect 2009;72:169-75.
9. Hadaway L. Short peripheral intravenous catheters and infections. J Infus Nurs 2012;35:230-40.
10. Frey AM, Schears GJ. Why are we stuck on tape and suture? A review of catheter securement devices. J Infus Nurs 2006;29:34-8.
11. Bregenzer T, Conen D, Sakmann P, et al. Is routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters necessary? Arch Intern Med 1998;158:151-6.
12. Naimer SA, Temira F. Evaluation of techniques for intravenous catheter and tubing fixation. Mil Med 2004;169:79-81.
13. Van Gessel H, McCavana C. Increased incidence of infections associated with peripheral IV cannulae: recognition, investigation, interventions. Aust Infect Cont 2006;11:39-45.
14. Sheppard K, Ledesma M, Morris N, et al. A prospective study of two intravenous catheter securement techniques in a skilled nursing facility. J Intraven Nurs 1999;22:151-6.
15. Campbell H, Carrington M. Peripheral IV cannula dressings: advantages and disadvantages. Br J Nurs 1999;8:1420-7.
16. Smith B, Royer TI. New standards for improving peripheral I.V. catheter securement. Nursing 2007;37:72-4.
17. Hoffmann KK, Weber DJ, Samsa GP, et al. Transparent polyurethane film as an intravenous catheter dressing: a meta-analysis of the infection risks. JAMA 1992;267:2072-6.
18. Maki DG, Ringer M. Evaluation of dressing regimens for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous catheters: gauze, a transparent polyurethane dressing, and an iodophor-transparent dressing. JAMA 1987;258:2396-403.
19. NSW Health. Nursing management of arterial catheters in critically ill patients. Sydney: Arterial Guidelines Development Network, Intensive Care Coordination and Monitoring Unit, 2007.
20. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:e162-93.
21. Callaghan S, Copnell B, Johnston L. Comparison of two methods of peripheral intravenous catheter securement in the pediatric setting. J Infus Nurs 2002;25:256-64.
22. Needham R, Strehle EM. Evaluation of dressings used with local anaesthetic cream and for peripheral venous cannulation. Paediatr Nurs 2008;20:34-6.
23. Schears GJ. Summary of product trials for 10, 164 patients: comparing an intravenous stabilizing device to tape. J Infus Nurs 2006;29:225-31.
24. Aukerman DF, Sebastianelli WJ, Nashelsky J. Clinical inquiries. How does tissue adhesive compare with suturing for superficial lacerations? J Fam Pract2005;54:378.
25. Singer AJ, Thode HCJ. A review of the literature on octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Am J Surg 2004;187:238-48.
26. Wilkinson JN, Fitz-Henry J. Securing epidural catheters with Histoacryl glue. Anaesthesia 2008;63:324.
27. Wilkinson JN, Sheikh N, Jayamaha J. Tissue adhesive as an alternative to sutures for securing central venous catheters. Anaesthesia 2007;62:969-70.
28. Simonova G, Rickard C, Dunster K, et al. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives-effective securement technique for intravascular catheters: in vitro testing of safety and feasibility. Anaesth Intensive Care 2012;40:460-6.
29. Wilkinson JN, Chikhani M, Mortimer K, et al. The antimicrobial effect of Histoacryl skin adhesive. Anaesthesia 2008;63:1382-4.
30. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655.
31. Webster J, Clarke S, Paterson D, et al. Routine care of peripheral intravenous catheters versus clinically indicated replacement: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008;337:a339.
32. Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med 1977;296:1305-9.
33. Rickard CM, Webster J, Wallis MC, et al. Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet 2012;380:1066-74.
34. Bhende S, Rothenburger S, Spangler DJ, et al. In vitro assessment of microbial barrier properties of Dermabond topical skin adhesive. Surg Infect 2002;3:251-7.
35. Donlan RM. Biofilms and device-associated infections. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:277-81.
36. Sherertz RJ, Raad II, Belani A, et al. Three-year experience with sonicated vascular catheter cultures in a clinical microbiology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:76-82.