A stochastic multi-objective location-allocation-routing problem for tire supply chain considering sustainability aspects and quantity discounts

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 198, Issue , 2018, Pages 704-720

  Ebrahimi, Seyed Babak ^a  

^a K N TOOSI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Closed loop sustainable supply chain; Multi objective optimization; Stochastic programming; Tire industry; constraint method

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENCY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; SUPPLY CHAINS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TIRE INDUSTRY; TIRES;

CLOSED-LOOP SUPPLY CHAIN NETWORKS; CONSTRAINT METHODS; ENVIRONMENTAL EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTIONS; FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS; LOCATION ALLOCATION; SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAINS; TRANSPORTATION VEHICLES;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 85053112859     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.059     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aktin, T., Gergin, Z., Mathematical modelling of sustainable procurement strategies: three case studies. J. Clean. Prod. 113 (2016), 767–780 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.057.
2. Amin, S.H., Zhang, G., Akhtar, P., Effects of uncertainty on a tire closed-loop supply chain network. Expert Syst. Appl. 73 (2017), 82–91 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.12.024.
3. Ansari, Z.N., Kant, R., A state-of-art literature review reflecting 15 years of focus on sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 142 (2017), 2524–2543 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.023.
4. Bai, C., Sarkis, J., Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 124 (2010), 252–264 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.11.023.
5. Banaeian, N., Mobli, H., Fahimnia, B., Nielsen, I.E., Omid, M., Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: a case study from the agri-food industry. Comput. Oper. Res. 89 (2018), 337–347 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2016.02.015.
6. Barnett, J., Watson, J.-P., Woodruff, D.L., BBPH: using progressive hedging within branch and bound to solve multi-stage stochastic mixed integer programs. Oper. Res. Lett. 45 (2017), 34–39 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2016.11.006.
7. Barros, A.I., Dekker, R., Scholten, V., A two-level network for recycling sand: a case study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 110:2 (1998), 199–214.
8. Beltran-Royo, C., Two-stage stochastic mixed-integer linear programming: the conditional scenario approach. Omega 70 (2017), 31–42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.08.010.
9. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Chance-Constrained programming. Manag. Sci. 6 (1959), 73–79 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.6.1.73.
10. Chen, W., Wu, F., Geng, W., Yu, G., Carbon emissions in China's industrial sectors. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 117 (2017), 264–273 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.10.008.
11. Cheraghalipour, A., Farsad, S., A bi-objective sustainable supplier selection and order allocation considering quantity discounts under disruption risks: a case study in plastic industry. Comput. Ind. Eng. 118 (2018), 237–250 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.02.041.
12. Cheraghalipour, A., Paydar, M.M., Hajiaghaei-keshteli, M., An integrated approach for collection center selection in reverse logistic. Int. J. Eng. Trans. A Basics 30 (2017), 1005–1016 https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2017.30.07a.10.
13. Cheraghalipour, A., Paydar, M.M., Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M., A Bi-objective optimization for citrus closed-loop supply chain using pareto-based algorithms. Appl. Soft Comput. 69 (2018), 33–59 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.022.
14. De Giovanni, P., A joint maximization incentive in closed-loop supply chains with competing retailers: the case of spent-battery recycling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 268:1 (2018), 128–147 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.01.003.
15. de Souza, C.D.R., D'Agosto, M. de A., Value chain analysis applied to the scrap tire reverse logistics chain: an applied study of co-processing in the cement industry. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 78 (2013), 15–25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.06.007.
16. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S.J., The design of a responsive sustainable supply chain network under uncertainty. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 80 (2015), 427–445 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6967-8.
17. Ebrahimi, S.B., A bi-objective model for a multi-echelon supply chain design considering efficiency and customer satisfaction: a case study in plastic parts industry. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 95 (2018), 3631–3649 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1437-0.
18. Fallah, H., Eskandari, H., Pishvaee, M.S., Competitive closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. J. Manuf. Syst. 37 (2015), 649–661 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.01.005.
19. Gao, D., Xu, Z., Ruan, Y.Z., Lu, H., From a systematic literature review to integrated definition for sustainable supply chain innovation (SSCI). J. Clean. Prod. 142 (2017), 1518–1538 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.153.
20. Govindan, K., Jafarian, A., Nourbakhsh, V., Bi-objective integrating sustainable order allocation and sustainable supply chain network strategic design with stochastic demand using a novel robust hybrid multi-objective metaheuristic. Comput. Oper. Res. 62 (2015), 112–130 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2014.12.014.
21. Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., Jafarian, A., A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. J. Clean. Prod. 47 (2013), 345–354 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014.
22. Grimm, J.H., Hofstetter, J.S., Sarkis, J., Critical factors for sub-supplier management: a sustainable food supply chains perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 152 (2014), 159–173 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.011.
23. Gruner, R.L., Power, D., Mimicking natural ecosystems to develop sustainable supply chains: a theory of socio-ecological intergradation. J. Clean. Prod. 149 (2017), 251–264 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.109.
24. Haddadsisakht, A., Ryan, S.M., Closed-loop supply chain network design with multiple transportation modes under stochastic demand and uncertain carbon tax. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 195 (2018), 118–131 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.09.009.
25. Hassini, E., Surti, C., Searcy, C., A literature review and a case of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 38 (2012), 848–858.
26. Javadian, N., Modarres, S., Bozorgi, A., A bi-objective stochastic optimization model for humanitarian relief chain by using evolutionary algorithms. Int. J. Eng. Trans. A Basics 30 (2017), 1526–1537.
27. Kadambala, D.K., Subramanian, N., Tiwari, M.K., Abdulrahman, M., Liu, C., Closed loop supply chain networks: designs for energy and time value efficiency. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 183 (2017), 382–393 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.004.
28. Kumar, B.M., Saravanan, R., Network design for reverse logistics – a case of recycling used truck tires. Appl. Mech. Mater. 592:594 (2014), 2677–2688 https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.592-594.2677.
29. Lebreton, B., Tuma, A., A quantitative approach to assessing the profitability of car and truck tire remanufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 104 (2006), 639–652 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.010.
30. Lee, D.-H., Dong, M., Dynamic network design for reverse logistics operations under uncertainty. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 45 (2009), 61–71 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2008.08.002.
31. Li, G.-D., Yamaguchi, D., Nagai, M., A grey-based rough decision-making approach to supplier selection. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 36 (2008), 1032–1040 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0910-y.
32. Listeş, O., Dekker, R., A stochastic approach to a case study for product recovery network design. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 160 (2005), 268–287 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2001.12.001.
33. Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S.K., Garg, C.P., An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 140 (2016), 1686–1698 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.078.
34. Mavrotas, G., Effective implementation of the ε-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 213 (2009), 455–465 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.037.
35. Ogbe, E., Li, X., A new cross decomposition method for stochastic mixed-integer linear programming. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 256 (2017), 487–499 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.005.
36. Papadopoulos, T., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., Altay, N., Childe, S.J., Fosso-Wamba, S., The role of Big Data in explaining disaster resilience in supply chains for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 142 (2017), 1108–1118 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.059.
37. Paydar, M.M., Babaveisi, V., Safaei, A.S., An engine oil closed-loop supply chain design considering collection risk. Comput. Chem. Eng. 104 (2017), 38–55 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.04.005.
38. Paydar, M.M., Saidi-Mehrabad, M., Revised multi-choice goal programming for integrated supply chain design and dynamic virtual cell formation with fuzzy parameters. Int. J. Comput. Integrated Manuf. 28 (2015), 251–265 https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2013.874596.
39. Pedram, A., Yusoff, N. Bin, Udoncy, O.E., Mahat, A.B., Pedram, P., Babalola, A., Integrated forward and reverse supply chain: a tire case study. Waste Manag. 60 (2017), 460–470 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.029.
40. Pishvaee, M.S., Farahani, R.Z., Dullaert, W., A memetic algorithm for bi-objective integrated forward/reverse logistics network design. Comput. Oper. Res. 37 (2010), 1100–1112 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2009.09.018.
41. Pishvaee, M.S., Torabi, S.A., A possibilistic programming approach for closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Fuzzy Set Syst. 161 (2010), 2668–2683 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2010.04.010.
42. Qiang (Patrick), Q., The closed-loop supply chain network with competition and design for remanufactureability. J. Clean. Prod. 105 (2015), 348–356 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.005.
43. Rathore, P., Kota, S., Chakrabarti, A., Sustainability through remanufacturing in India: a case study on mobile handsets. J. Clean. Prod. 19 (2011), 1709–1722 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.016.
44. Saavedra, M.M.R., Fontes, C.H.de O., Freires, F.G.M., Sustainable and renewable energy supply chain: a system dynamics overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82 (2018), 247–259 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.033.
45. Safaei, A.S., Farsad, S., Paydar, M.M., Robust bi-level optimization of relief logistics operations. Appl. Math. Model. 56 (2018), 359–380 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.12.003.
46. Savaskan, R.C., Bhattacharya, S., Van Wassenhove, L.N., Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Manag. Sci. 50 (2004), 239–252 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0186.
47. Simic, V., Dabic-Ostojic, S., Interval-parameter chance-constrained programming model for uncertainty-based decision making in tire retreading industry. J. Clean. Prod. 167 (2017), 1490–1498 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.122.
48. Stoyan, S.J., Dessouky, M.M., A Stochastic Mixed-Integer Programming approach to the energy-technology management problem. Comput. Ind. Eng. 63 (2012), 594–606 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.07.012.
49. Subulan, K., Taşan, A.S., Baykasoğlu, A., Designing an environmentally conscious tire closed-loop supply chain network with multiple recovery options using interactive fuzzy goal programming. Appl. Math. Model. 39 (2015), 2661–2702 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APM.2014.11.004.
50. Sun, L., Wang, Q., Zhang, J., Inter-industrial carbon emission transfers in China: economic effect and optimization strategy. Ecol. Econ. 132 (2017), 55–62 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.005.
51. Torres-Machi, C., Pellicer, E., Yepes, V., Chamorro, A., Towards a sustainable optimization of pavement maintenance programs under budgetary restrictions. J. Clean. Prod. 148 (2017), 90–102 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.100.
52. Vahdani, B., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Modarres, M., Baboli, A., Reliable design of a forward/reverse logistics network under uncertainty: a robust-M/M/c queuing model. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 48 (2012), 1152–1168 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2012.06.002.
53. Vahidi, F., Torabi, S.A., Ramezankhani, M.J., Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. J. Clean. Prod. 174 (2018), 1351–1365 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.012.
54. Zhang, M., Tse, Y.K., Doherty, B., Li, S., Akhtar, P., Sustainable supply chain management: confirmation of a higher-order model. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 128 (2018), 206–221 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.015.
55. Zhou, X., Pedrycz, W., Kuang, Y., Zhang, Z., Type-2 fuzzy multi-objective DEA model: an application to sustainable supplier evaluation. Appl. Soft Comput. 46 (2016), 424–440 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.038.