Merchants of Optimism: Agenda-Setting Organizations and the Framing of Performance-Based Funding for Higher Education

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 88, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 754-784

  Miller, Graham N S ^a   Morphew, Christopher C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accountability; higher education policy; performance funding; philanthropic foundations; policy diffusion; state policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 85051852895     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: 15384640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2017.1313084     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Alssid, J. L., Goldberg, M., & Schneider, J., (2011). The case for community colleges: Aligning higher education and workforce needs in Massachusetts. Boston, MA: The Boston Foundation.
2. Anderson, Z., (2014, May 29). Campus critique. Sarasota Herald Tribune. Retrieved from http://www.heraldtribune.com/news/20140529/campus-critique
3. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A., (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, methods, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Berelson, B., (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
5. Berrett, D., (2013, October 28). States demand that colleges show how well their students learn. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/States-to-Colleges-Prove-Your/142651
6. Berry, F. S., (1994). Sizing up state policy innovation research. Policy Studies Journal, 22, 442–455. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1994.tb01480.x
7. Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D., (1990). State lottery adoption as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84, 395–415. doi:10.2307/1963526
8. Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D., (1999). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P., Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 169–200). Boulder, CO: Westview.
9. Bombardieri, M., (2013, August 12). Mass. ties community college funding to results. The Boston Globe. Retrieved from https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/08/11/state-ties-community-college-funding-students-improvement/J8BOFMPu3BvjGXBi4DzTdL/story.html
10. Brogan, F. T., (2013, March 14). Florida’s universities right on track. Tampa Bay Times.Retrieved from http://www.lexisnexis.com
11. Burke, J. C., (2005). The many faces of accountability. In J. C., Burke (Ed.), Achieving accountability in higher education (pp. 1–24). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12. Burke, J. C., & Minassians, H., (2003). Performance reporting: ‘Real’ accountability or accountability ‘lite’: The seventh annual survey. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute of Government.
13. Burke, J. C., & Modarresi, S., (2000). To keep or not to keep performance funding: Signals from stakeholders. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 432–453. doi:10.2307/2649147
14. Carapezza, K., (2013, July 12). ‘Performance-based’ community college funding ties budget to outcome. WGBH News. Retrieved from http://news.wgbh.org/post/performance-based-community-college-funding-ties-budget-outcome
15. Chronicle of Higher Education. (2014). Almanac of higher education 2014: Florida. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Florida-Almanac-2014/148047
16. Clayton, C., (2013, April 4). Performance funding update. Commissioner’s Corner. Retrieved from http://mus.edu/che/newsletters/CommissionersCorner2.html
17. Complete College America (CCA). (2013). The game changers: Are states implementing the best reforms to get more college graduates? Retrieved from http://www.completecollege.org/pdfs/CCA%20Nat%20Report%20Oct18-FINAL-singles.pdf
18. Criser, M., III, (2014, February 14). Florida’s State University System adopts metrics to gauge, improve education. The Bradenton Herald. Retrieved from http://www.flbog.edu/board/office/fac/_doc/performance_funding/newsclips/Chancellor-Criser-Letter-to-the-Editor-Bradenton-Herald.pdf.
19. Davies, L., (2014). State ‘shared responsibility’ policies for improved outcomes: Lessons learned. Washington, DC: HCM Strategists. Retrieved from http://hcmstrategists.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/HCM-State-Shared-Responsibility-RADD-2.0.pdf
20. Davis, B. A., (2014). Governor Scott signs State University budget. State University System of Florida. Retrieved from http://www.flbog.edu/pressroom/news.php?id=528
21. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W., (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
22. Dougherty, K. J., (2011). Implementation and impacts of performance funding in three states. Retrieved from http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/research-project/performance-funding-three-states.html
23. Dougherty, K. J., Jones, S. M., Lahr, H., Natow, R. B., Pheatt, L., & Reddy, V., (2013a). The espoused theory of action of higher education performance funding: How tightly coupled is it? Unpublished manuscript, Community College Research Center, Columbia University, New York, NY.
24. Dougherty, K. J., Jones, S. M., Lahr, H., Natow, R. B., Pheatt, L., & Reddy, V., (2013b). Performance funding and organizational learning in three states. New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center.
25. Dougherty, K. J., Jones, S. M., Lahr, H., Natow, R. B., Pheatt, L., & Reddy, V., (2014). Performance funding for higher education: Forms, origins, impacts, and futures. The Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 655, 163–184. doi:10.1177/0002716214541042
26. Dougherty, K. J., & Natow, R. S., (2010). Continuity and change in long-lasting state performance funding systems for higher education: The cases of Tennessee and Florida (CCRC Working Paper No. 18). New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College.
27. Dougherty, K. J., & Natow, R. S., (2015). The politics of performance funding for higher education: Origins, discontinuations, and transformations. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28. Dougherty, K. J., Natow, R. S., & Vega, B. E., (2012). Popular but unstable: Explaining why state performance funding systems in the United States often do not persist. Teachers College Record, 14(1), 1–41.
29. Dougherty, K. J., & Reddy, V., (2011). The impacts of state performance funding systems on higher education institutions: Research literature review and policy recommendations (CCRC Working Paper no. 37) New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center. Retrieved from http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/impacts-state-funding-higher-education.pdf
30. Dougherty, K. J., & Reddy, V., (2013). Performance funding for higher education: What are the mechanisms? What are the impacts? ASHE Higher Education Report, 39(2), 1–134.
31. Farmer, L., (2013, November 1). Massachusetts’ big bet on performance-based college funding. Governing.Retrieved from: http://www.governing.com/topics/education/gov-massachusetts-bet-on-performance-college-funding.html
32. Florida House. (2014, March 19). Florida House introduces performance funding measure for state universities. WCTV. Retrieved from http://www.wctv.tv/home/headlines/Florida-House-Introduces-Performance-Funding-Measure-for-State-Universities-251012381.html
33. Florida House of Representatives. (2014, April 3). House floor session [Session video]. Retrieved from http://www.flsenate.gov/media/VideoPlayer?EventID=2443575804_2014041068
34. Fryar, A. H., (2011, June). The disparate impacts of accountability: Searching for causal mechanisms. Paper presented at the 2011 Public Management Research Conference, Syracuse, NY.
35. Gates Foundation. (n.d.). Awarded grants. Retrieved from http://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-Work/Quick-Links/Grants-Database
36. Hall, C., & Thomas, S. L., (2012, April). ‘Advocacy philanthropy’ and the public policy agenda: The role of modern foundations in American higher education. Paper presented at the 93rd annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
37. Hawkins, B., & Holden, C., (2013). Framing the alcohol policy debate: Industry actors and the regulation of the UK beverage alcohol market. Critical Policy Studies, 7, 53–71. doi:10.1080/19460171.2013.766023
38. Hayes, S., (2013, November 2). USF asks students: Don't dawdle please. Tampa Bay Times Retrieved from http://www.lexisnexis.com
39. HCM Strategists. (2013). Adopt and sustain outcomes-based funding for public higher education institutions. Strategy Labs. Retrieved from http://strategylabs.luminafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/AdoptandSustainOBFAPRIL2pager.pdf
40. HCM Strategists. (n.d.). Our clients. Retrieved from http://hcmstrategists.com/our-clients
41. Hillman, N., Tandberg, D. A., & Fryar, A., (2015). Evaluating the impacts of ‘new’ performance funding in higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 501–519. doi:10.3102/0162373714560224
42. Hillman, N. W., Tandberg, D. A., & Gross, J. P. K., (2014). Performance funding in higher education: Do financial incentives impact college completions? The Journal of Higher Education, 85, 826–857. doi:10.1353/jhe.2014.0031
43. Johnson, C. S., (2013a, March 8). Regents: Faculty involvement key in writing performance measures. The Montana Standard. Retrieved from http://www.lexisnexis.com
44. Johnson, C. S., (2013b, February 8). U-system budget hikes may be tied to performance measures. The Montana Standard. Retrieved from http://www.lexisnexis.com
45. Joint Resolution of the Senate and House 2013, 63 MT Congress SJ0013. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.mus.edu/CCM/SJ0013.pdf
46. Jones, D. P., (2012). Performance funding: From idea to action. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED536832.pdf
47. Jones, D. P., (2013). Outcomes-based funding: The wave of implementation. Retrieved from http://completecollege.org/pdfs/Outcomes-Based-Funding-Report-Final.pdf
48. Kazis, R., & Couturier, L., (2013). Stepping up for community colleges: Building on the momentum to improve student access in Massachusetts. Boston, MA: The Boston Foundation.
49. Kelchen, R., & Stedrak, L. J., (2016). Does performance-based funding affect colleges’ financial priorities? Journal of Education Finance, 41, 302–321. doi:10.1353/jef.2016.0006
50. Kingdon, J. W., (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
51. Krippendorff, K., (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Lubienski, C., Scott, J., & DeBray, E., (2011, July 22). The rise of intermediary organizations in knowledge production, advocacy, and educational policy (ID Number: 16487). Teachers College Record. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org
53. Lumina Foundation. (2014). Four steps to finishing first: An agenda for increasing college productivity to create a better-educated society. Retrieved from http://www.luminafoundation.org/publications/Four_Steps_to_Finishing_First_in_Higher_Education.pdf
54. Majone, G., (1989). Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
55. Massachusetts Department of Higher Education. (n.d.). About the public higher education system. Retrieved from http://www.mass.edu/system/aboutsystem.asp
56. McLendon, M. K., (2003). State governance reform of higher education: Patterns, trends, and theories of the public policy process. In J., Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XVIII, pp. 57–143). London, England: Kluwer.
57. McLendon, M. K., & Hearn, J. C., (2013). The resurgent interest in performance-based funding for higher education. Academe, 99(6), 25–30.
58. McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Deaton, R., (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 1–24. doi:10.3102/01623737028001001
59. McLendon, M. K., Heller, D. E., & Young, S., (2005). State postsecondary education policy innovation: Politics, competition, and the interstate migration of policy ideas. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 363–400. doi:10.1353/jhe.2005.0029
60. Middleton, B., (2014, March 25). Board discusses downsides of performance-based funding and makes recommendations to keep students at UNF. Spinnaker. Retrieved from http://unfspinnaker.com/progress-of-recent-board-of-trustees-meeting
61. Montana State Senate Committee on Education and Cultural Resources [Session audio]. (2013, February 15). Retrieved from http://montanalegislature.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?clip_id=1904&meta_id=22060
62. Montana State Senate Floor Session [Session audio]. (2013, February 25). Retrieved from http://montanalegislature.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=54&clip_id=2147
63. Montana University System. (2014a). Colleges & universities. Retrieved from http://mus.edu/Universities/university_main.asp
64. Montana University System. (2014b). Complete College Montana: An overview of Montana’s initiative to increase college completions. Retrieved from http://mus.edu/CCM/CCM%20Overview%20Presentation.pdf
65. Montana University System (2016). Performance funding. Retrieved from https://mus.edu/CCM/performancefunding/MUS-PerformanceFundingCriteria5-19-16.pdf
66. National Conference of State Legislatures. (2014). Performance-based funding for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/performance-funding.aspx
67. Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M., (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
68. Perna, L. W., & Finney, J. E., (2015). The attainment agenda: State policy leadership in higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
69. Prasad, B. D., (2008). Content analysis: A method in social science research. In D. K., Lal Das & V., Bhaskaran (Eds.), Research methods for social work (pp. 173–193). New Delhi, India: Rawat.
70. Quinn, R., Tompkins-Stange, M., & Meyerson, D., (2014). Beyond grantmaking: Philanthropic foundations as agents of change and institutional entrepreneurs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43, 950–968. doi:10.1177/0899764013488836
71. Rabovsky, T. M., (2012). Accountability in higher education: Exploring impacts on state budgets and institutional spending patterns. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 675–700. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur069
72. Reckhow, S., (2012). Follow the money: How foundation dollars change public school politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
73. Rein, M., & Schön, D., (1996). Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice. Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization, 9, 85–104. doi:10.1007/BF02832235
74. Rivard, R., (2014, August 7). Punished for its mission? Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/08/07/one-liberal-arts-college-loses-money-after-its-state-adopts-performance-funding
75. Roach, R., (2013, August 13). Massachusetts to tie community college funding to performance. Diverse Education. Retrieved from http://diverseeducation.com/article/55243/
76. Rogers, R., (2011). Why philanthro-policymaking matters. Society, 48, 376–381. doi:10.1007/s12115-011-9456-1
77. Rutherford, A., & Rabovsky, T., (2014). Evaluating impacts of performance funding policies on student outcomes in higher education. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655, 185–208. doi:10.1177/0002716214541048
78. Salomon-Fernandez, Y., (2014, July 22). The Massachusetts community college performance-based funding formula: A new model for New England. New England Journal of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.nebhe.org/thejournal/the-massachusetts-community-college-performance-based-funding-formula-a-new-model-for-new-england/
79. Sanford, T., & Hunter, J., (2011). Impact of performance-funding on retention and graduation Rates. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19, 33. doi:10.14507/epaa.v19n33.2011
80. Scott, J., & Habbar, H., (2014). The hub and the spokes: Foundations, intermediary organizations, incentivist reforms, and the politics of research evidence. Educational Policy, 28, 233–257. doi:10.1177/0895904813515327
81. Shulock, N., & Snyder, M., (2013, December 5). Don’t dismiss performance funding. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2013/12/05/performance-funding-isnt-perfect-recent-study-shortchanges-it-essay
82. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D., (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–218.
83. Snyder, M., (2015). Driving better outcomes: Typology and principles to inform outcomes-based funding. Washington, DC: HCM Strategists. Retrieved from http://hcmstrategists.com/drivingoutcomes/wp-content/themes/hcm/pdf/Driving%20Outcomes.pdf
84. State of Montana. (2013). Addendum to the February 1, 2013 memorandum of understanding between Office of Governor Steve Bullock and the Montana University System. Retrieved from http://www.mus.edu/board/meetings/2013/Mar2013/2013_CAP_Addendum.pdf
85. State University System of Florida. (2014). Board of Governors performance based funding metric definitions. Retrieved from http://www.flbog.edu/board/office/fac/_doc/performance_funding/Definitions_2014.pdf
86. Stone, D. A., (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104, 281–300. doi:10.2307/2151585
87. Tandberg, D. A., & Hillman, N. W., (2014). State higher education performance funding: Data, outcomes, and policy implications. Journal of Higher Education Finance, 39, 222–243.
88. Tandberg, D. A., Hillman, N. W., & Barakat, M., (2014). State higher education performance funding for community colleges: Diverse effects and policy implications. Teachers College Record, 116(12).
89. Tobin, T. C., (2014, February 28). Florida schools: Cheaper, faster, better? Tampa Bay Times. Retrieved from http://www.tampabay.com/news/perspective/schools-cheaper-faster-better/2167884
90. University of Florida. (2014). Cost of attendance. Retrieved from http://www.sfa.ufl.edu/basics/cost-of-attendance
91. University of West Florida. (2014). Performance funding. Retrieved October 1, 2014, from http://uwf.edu/offices/government-relations/legislative-issues/performance-funding
92. U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). Quick facts. Retrieved June 1, 2014, from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/
93. Volden, C., (2006). States as policy laboratories: Emulating success in the Children’s Health Insurance Program. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 294–312. doi:10.1111/ajps.2006.50.issue-2
94. Walker, J. L., (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63, 880–899. doi:10.2307/1954434
95. Wessler, M., (2013, August 19). Bullock announces Complete College Montana Initiative: Initiative will increase the number of Montanans with college degrees and certificates. State of Montana. Retrieved from http://mus.edu/CCM/081913_Complete_College,%20Gov%20News%20Release.pdf
96. Wexelman, A., (2015, February 5). UCF receives $21.8 million in performance funding. Central Florida Future. Retrieved from http://www.centralfloridafuture.com/story/news/2015/02/05/ucf-receives-218-million-in-performance-funding/22926001/