Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks for Discourse Compositionality

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 119-126

  Kalchbrenner, Nal ^a   Blunsom, Phil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS; SEMANTICS;

'CURRENT; COMPOSITIONALITY; CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK; DISCOURSE MODELLING; FEATURE ENGINEERINGS; PRE-TRAINING; SEMANTIC VECTORS; SEQUENTIALITY; SIMPLE++; STATE-OF-THE-ART PERFORMANCE;

CONVOLUTION;

EID: 85051665073     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. [Austin1962] John L. Austin. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon.
2. [Baroni and Zamparelli2010] Marco Baroni and Roberto Zamparelli. 2010. Nouns are vectors, adjectives are matrices: Representing adjective-noun constructions in semantic space. In EMNLP, pages 1183-1193.
3. [Blacoe and Lapata2012] William Blacoe and Mirella Lapata. 2012. A comparison of vector-based representations for semantic composition. In EMNLPCoNLL, pages 546-556
4. [Calhoun et al.2010] Sasha Calhoun, Jean Carletta, Jason M. Brenier, Neil Mayo, Dan Jurafsky, Mark Steedman, and David Beaver. 2010. The nxt-format switchboard corpus: A rich resource for investigating the syntax, semantics, pragmatics and prosody of dialogue. Language Resources and Evaluation, 44(4):387-419.
5. [Collobert and Weston2008] R. Collobert and J. Weston. 2008. A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML.
6. [Frege1892] Gottlob Frege. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100.
7. [Grefenstette et al.2011] Edward Grefenstette, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh, Stephen Clark, Bob Coecke, and Stephen Pulman. 2011. Concrete sentence spaces for compositional distributional models of meaning. CoRR, abs/1101.0309.
8. [Hermann and Blunsom2013] Karl Moritz Hermann and Phil Blunsom. 2013. The Role of Syntax in Vector Space Models of Compositional Semantics. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Sofia, Bulgaria, August. Association for Computational Linguistics. Forthcoming.
9. [Jones et al.2006] Rosie Jones, Benjamin Rey, Omid Madani, and Wiley Greiner. 2006. Generating query substitutions. In WWW, pages 387-396.
10. [Korta and Perry2012] Kepa Korta and John Perry. 2012. Pragmatics. In Edward N. Zalta, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2012 edition.
11. [LeCun et al.2001] Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner. 2001. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. In Intelligent Signal Processing, pages 306-351. IEEE Press.
12. [Mikolov et al.2010] Tomas Mikolov, Martin Karafiát, Lukas Burget, Jan Cernocký, and Sanjeev Khudanpur. 2010. Recurrent neural network based language model. In INTERSPEECH, pages 1045-1048.
13. [Mitchell and Lapata2010] Jeff Mitchell and Mirella Lapata. 2010. Composition in distributional models of semantics. Cognitive Science, 34(8):1388-1429.
14. [Potts2011] Christopher Potts. 2011. Pragmatics. In Ruslan Mitkov, editor, The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics. Oxford University Press, 2 edition.
15. [Rumelhart et al.1986] D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams. 1986. Learning internal representations by error propagation. MIT Press Computational Models Of Cognition And Perception Series, page 318362.
16. [Scheible and Schütze2013] Christian Scheible and Hinrich Schütze. 2013. Cutting recursive autoencoder trees. CoRR, abs/1301.2811.
17. [Socher et al.2012] Richard Socher, Brody Huval, Christopher D. Manning, and Andrew Y. Ng. 2012.
18. Semantic Compositionality Through Recursive Matrix-Vector Spaces. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
19. [Stolcke et al.2000] Andreas Stolcke, Klaus Ries, Noah Coccaro, Elizabeth Shriberg, Rebecca A. Bates, Daniel Jurafsky, Paul Taylor, Rachel Martin, Carol Van Ess-Dykema, and Marie Meteer. 2000.
20. Dialog act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Computational Linguistics, 26(3):339-373.
21. [Sutskever et al.2011] Ilya Sutskever, James Martens, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. 2011. Generating text with recurrent neural networks. In ICML, pages 1017-1024.
22. [Turney and Pantel2010] Peter D. Turney and Patrick Pantel. 2010. From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR), 37:141-188.
23. [Wang and Manning2012] Sida Wang and Christopher D. Manning. 2012. Baselines and bigrams: Simple, good sentiment and topic classification. In ACL (2), pages 90-94.
24. [Williams2012] Jason D. Williams. 2012. A belief tracking challenge task for spoken dialog systems. In NAACL-HLT Workshop on Future Directions and Needs in the Spoken Dialog Community: Tools and Data, SDCTD '12, pages 23-24, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.