Cutting recursive autoencoder trees

1st International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2013 - Conference Track Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages

  Scheible, Christian ^a   Schütze, Hinrich ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; DEEP ARCHITECTURES; EMPIRICAL TEST; HUMAN JUDGMENTS; LEARNING MODELS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; SEMI-SUPERVISED; STRUCTURAL REPRESENTATION;

DEEP LEARNING;

EID: 85083951672     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Collins, M., 1999. Head-driven statistical models for natural language parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
2. Collobert, R., Weston, J., Bottou, L., Karlen, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Kuksa, P., Nov. 2011. Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 999888, 2493–2537.
3. Deselaers, T., Hasan, S., Bender, O., Ney, H., 2009. A deep learning approach to machine transliteration. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. StatMT’09. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp. 233–241.
4. Glorot, X., Bordes, A., Bengio, Y., June 2011. Domain adaptation for large-scale sentiment classification: A deep learning approach. In: Getoor, L., Scheffer, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-11). ICML’11. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 513–520.
5. Kanerva, P., Kristoferson, J., Holst, A., 2000. Random indexing of text samples for latent semantic analysis. In: In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum, pp. 103–6.
6. McDonald, R., 2006. Discriminative learning and spanning tree algorithms for dependency parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
7. Pang, B., Lee, L., June 2005. Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’05). Association for Computational Linguistics, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 115–124.
8. Polanyi, L., Zaenen, A., 2006. Contextual valence shifters. Computing attitude and affect in text: Theory and applications, 1–10.
9. Socher, R., Manning, C., Ng, A., 2010. Learning continuous phrase representations and syntactic parsing with recursive neural networks. In: Proceedings of the NIPS-2010 Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning Workshop.
10. Socher, R., Pennington, J., Huang, E. H., Ng, A. Y., Manning, C. D., 2011. Semi-Supervised Recursive Autoencoders for Predicting Sentiment Distributions. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
11. Tu, Z., He, Y., Foster, J., van Genabith, J., Liu, Q., Lin, S., 2012. Identifying high-impact substructures for convolution kernels in document-level sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers - Volume 2. ACL’12. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp. 338–343.