Analysing the Characteristics of Open Government Data Sources in Greece

Journal of the Knowledge Economy

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 721-753

  Alexopoulos, Charalampos ^a   Loukis, Euripidis ^a   Mouzakitis, Spiros ^b   Petychakis, Michalis ^b   Charalabidis, Yannis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE AEGEAN   (Greece)

^b NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Linked open data; Open government data; Public sector information; Semantic web; Transparency

Indexed keywords

EID: 85051643541     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18687873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13132-015-0298-8     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. AGIMO (2010). Declaration of Open Government, retrieved February 25, 2011 from http://www.finance.gov.au/e-government/strategy-and-governance/gov2/declaration-of-open-government.html
2. Alexopoulos, C., Loukis, E., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2013). An evaluation framework for traditional and advanced open public data e-infrastructures. Como, Italy: Paper presented at the 13th European Conference on eGovernment – ECEG
3. Alexopoulos, C., Zuiderwijk, A., Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E., Janssen, M. (2014). Designing a second generation of open data platforms: integrating open data and social media. In Electronic Government (pp. 230–241). Dublin, Ireland: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
4. Allan, R. (2009). The power of government information. In J. Gøtze & C. B. Pedersen (Eds.), State of the eUnion: government 2.0 and onwards. AuthorHouse
5. Bauer, F., & Kaltenböck, M. (2012). Linked open data: the essentials—a quick start guide for decision makers. Vienna, Austria: Monochrom Editions
6. Bertot, J. C., Gorham, U., Jaeger, P. T., Sarin, L. C., & Choi, H. (2014). Big data, open government and e-government: issues, policies and recommendations. Inf Polity, 19(1–2), 5–16
7. Cameron, D. (2010). Letter to Government departments on opening up data, retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/letter-to-government-departments-on-opening-up-data
8. Chan, C. (2013). From Open Data to Open Innovation Strategies: Creating e-Services Using Open Government Data, 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
9. Chena, J. V., Jubiladoa, R. J. M., Capistrano, E. P. S., & Yen, D. C. (2015). Factors affecting online tax filing—an application of the IS Success Model and trust theory. Comput Hum Behav, 43, 251–262
10. Dawes, S., Gharawi, M., & Burke, B. (2011). Knowledge and information sharing in transnational knowledge networks: a contextual perspective. In Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
11. DeLone, D. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Syst Res, 3(1), 60–95
12. DeLone, D. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst, 19(4), 9–30
13. Digital Agenda Assembly (2011). Report from the workshop “Open Data and re-use of public sector information”, Brussels 16–17 June 2011 http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/events/cf/daa11/item-display.cfm?id=5963
14. European Commission (2003). Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the Re-use of Public Sector Information, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:345:0090:0096:EN:PDF
15. European Commission (2013). Directive 2013/37/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 amending Directive 2003/98/EC on the re-use of public sector information, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?
16. European Commission (2014). Commission Notice – Guidelines on recommended standard licenses, datasets and charging for the reuse of documents of 24 July 2014, 2014/C 240/01, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/commission-notice-guidelines-recommended-standard-licences-datasets-and-charging-re-use
17. Executive Office of the President (2009). Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: Open Government Directive, Washington D. C., Memorandum No. M-10-06. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/open/documents/open-government-directive
18. Executive Office of the President (2013). Open Data Policy - Managing Information as an Asset. Washington D. C., Memorandum No. M-13-13. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2013/m-13-13.pdf
19. Geiger, C. P., & v Luecke, J. (2012). Open government and (linked) (open) (government) (data). J e-Democracy Open Gov, 4(2), 265–278
20. Gharawi, M., & Dawes, S. (2010). Conceptualizing knowledge and information sharing in transnational knowledge networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV ‘10)
21. Harrison, T. M., Guerrero, S., Burke, G. B., Cook, M., Cresswell, A., Helbig, N., Hrdinova, J., & Pardo, T. (2012a). Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Inf Polity, 17(2), 83–97
22. Harrison, T. M., Pardo, T. A., & Cook, M. (2012b). Creating open government ecosystems: a research and development agenda. Future Internet, 4, 900–928
23. Huijboom, N., & Van Den Broek, T. (2011). Open data: an international comparison of strategies. Eur J Epractice, 12, 1–13
24. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers, and myths of open data and open government. Inf Syst Manag, 29, 258–268
25. Jetzek, T., Avital, M., & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2013a). The generative mechanisms of open government data. In Proceedings of ECIS (p. 156). Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2013
26. Jetzek, T., Avital, M., & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2013b). Generating value from open government data. In proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems. ICIS 2013. Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2013
27. Kassen, M. (2013). A promising phenomenon of open data: a case study of the chicago open data Project. Gov Inf Q, 30, 508–5
28. Lathrop D., & Ruma L. (2010). Open government: collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice, 1st ed. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc
29. Maier, U., & Huber, S. (2011). Open: the changing relation between citizens, public administration, and political authority. JeDEM, 3(2), 182–191
30. Manyika J, Chui M, Groves P, Farrell D, Van Kuiken S, and Almasi Doshi E (2013) Open data: Unlocking innovation and performance with liquid information. McKinsey Global Institute, McKinsey Center for Government and McKinsey Business Technology Office. Available at: http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/open_data_unlocking_innovation_and_performance_with_liquid_information
31. Maylor, H., & Blackmon, K. (2005). Researching business and management. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan
32. McDermott, P. (2010). Building open government. Gov Inf Q, 27(4), 401–413
33. Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2009). Public information strategies: making government information available to citizens. Inf Polity, 14(1–2), 31–45
34. Mellouli, S., Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Zhang, J. (2014). Smart government, citizen participation and open data. Inf Polity, 19(1–2), 1–4
35. Obama, B. H. (2009). Transparency and open government. Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-pressoffice/transparencyand-open-government
36. Obama, B. (2010). Memo from President Obama on Transparency and Open Government. In D. Lathrop & L. Ruma (eds.), Open Government. http://www.whitehouse.gov/open/documents/open-government-directive. Accessed 18 April 2010
37. Open Knowledge Foundation (OKF) (2012) “Open Data Handbook version 1.0.0” (revised November 14, 2012). Available at http://opendatahandbook.org/pdf/OpenDataHandbook.pdf
38. Parycek P, & Sachs M (2010) Open government – information flow in web 2.0. European Journal of ePractice, 9 (1), 1 – 70
39. Petychakis, M., Vasileiou, O., Georgis, C., Mouzakitis, S., & Psarras, J. (2014). A state-of-the-art analysis of the current public data landscape from a functional, semantic and technical perspective. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res, 9(2), 34–47
40. ISA Programme (2011). Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrations, “Towards Open Government Metadata”. https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/towards_open_government_metadata_0.pdf
41. Ragin, C., & Amoroso, L. (2011). Constructing social research: the unity and diversity of method (2nd ed.). California: Pine Forge Press – Sage Publications
42. Rana, N., Dwivedi, Y., & Williams, M. (2013). Evaluating the validity of IS success models for e-government research: an empirical test and Integrated Model. Int J Electron Gov Res, 9(3), 1–22
43. Robinson, D. G., Yu, H., Zeller, W. P., & Felten, E. W. (2009). Government data and the invisible hand (Fall 2009). Yale J Law Technol, 11, 160. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1138083
44. Schwegmann, C. (2012). Open data in developing countries. In European Public Sector Information Platform - Topic Report 2013/02
45. United Nations (2014) United Nations E-Government Survey 2014 - E-Government for the Future we Want, Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations, accessed from http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/
46. Urbach, N., & Mueller, B. (2012). The updated DeLone and McLean Model of information systems success. In Y. Dwivedi, M. Wade, & S. Schneberger (Eds.), Information systems theory—explaining and predicting our digital society. New York: Springer
47. Wang, Y. S., & Liao, Y. W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: a validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Gov Inf Q, 25, 717–733
48. Wood, D. (Ed.). (2011). Linking Government Data. New York: Springer
49. Zijlstra T, and K Janssen (2013) The new PSI directive – as good as it seems? Open Knowledge Foundation Blog. [Online]. Available: http://blog.okfn.org/2013/04/19/the-new-psi-directive-as-good-as-it-seems/
50. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., van den Braak, S., & Charalabidis, Y. (2012a). Linking open data: challenges and solutions. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o ‘12) (pp. 304–305). New York, USA: ACM
51. Zuiderwijk, A., Jeffery, K., & Janssen, M. (2012b). The potential of metadata for linked open data and its value for users and publishers. J e-Democracy Open Gov, 4(2), 222–244
52. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., & Alibaks, R. S. (2012c). Socio-technical impediments of open data. Electron J e-Government, 10(2), 156–172
53. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., & Parnia, A. (2013). The complementarity of open data infrastructures: an analysis of functionalities. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o ‘13) (pp. 166–171). Quebec City, Canada: ACM
54. Zuiderwijk, A., Helbig, N., Gil-García, R., & Janssen, M. (2014). Special Issue on Innovation through Open Data - A Review of the State-of-the-Art and an Emerging Research Agenda: Guest Editors’ Introduction. Special Issue on Innovation through Open Data - A Review of the State-of-the-Art and an Emerging Research Agenda: Guest Editors’ Introduction. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res, 9(2), 1–13