Viewpoint: Beasts of the field? Ethics in agricultural and applied economics

Food Policy

Volumn 79, Issue , 2018, Pages 1-11

  Josephson, Anna ^a   Michler, Jeffrey D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Ethics; Research misconduct; Research practice; Role of economists; Scientific misconduct

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; ECONOMICS; ETHICS; RESEARCH; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 85051375182     PISSN: 03069192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Aiken, A.M., Davey, C., Hargreaves, J.R., Hayes, R.J., Re-analysis of health and educational impacts of a school-based deworming programme in Western Kenya: a pure replication. Int. J. Epidemiol. 44:5 (2015), 1572–1580.
2. Alderman, H., Das, J., Rao, V., Conducting ethical economic research: complications from the field. DeMartino, G.F., McCloskey, D.N., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics, 2016, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 402–422.
3. Anderson, M.L., Magruder, J., Split-sample Strategies for Avoiding False Discoveries. Working Paper 23544. 2017, National Bureau of Economic Research.
4. Anderson, R.G., Kichkha, A., Replication, meta-analysis, and research synthesis in economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:5 (2017), 56–59.
5. Athey, S., Imbens, G.W., The state of applied econometrics: causality and policy evaluation. J. Econ. Perspect. 31:2 (2017), 3–32.
6. Athey, S., Imbens, G.W., Pham, T., Wager, S., Estimating average treatment effects: supplementary analyses and remaining challenges. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:5 (2017), 278–281.
7. Barrett, C.B., Agrawal, A., Coomes, O.T., Platteau, J.-P., Stripe Review of Social Sciences in the CGIAR. Technical report. 2009, CGIAR Science Council.
8. Barrett, C.B., Carter, M.R., The power and pitfalls of experiments in development economics: some non-random reflections. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 32:4 (2010), 515–548.
9. Barrett, C.B., Cason, J.W., Overseas Research: A Practical Guide. 1997, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
10. Basken, P., Why Beall's List Died and What it Left Unresolved about Open Access. 2017, Chronicle of Higher Education.
11. Bauchner, H., Expression of Concern: Wansink B, Cheney MM. Super Bowls: Serving Bowl Size and Food Consumption. JAMA. 2005;293(14):1727-1728. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 2018.
12. Berry, J., Coffman, L.C., Hanley, D., Gihleb, R., Wilson, A.J., Assessing the rate of replication in economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:5 (2017), 27–31.
13. Boettke, P.J., O'Donnell, K.W., The social responsibility of economists. DeMartino, G.F., McCloskey, D.N., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics, 2016, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 116–136.
14. Breimyer, H.F., Scientific principle and practice in agricultural economics: an historical review. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 73:2 (1991), 243–254.
15. Brodeur, A., Lé, M., Sangnier, M., Zylberberg, Y., Star Wars: the empirics strike back. Am. Econ. J.: Appl. Econ. 8:1 (2016), 1–32.
16. Broockman, D., Kalla, J., Aronow, P., Irregularities in LeCour (2014). Mimeo. 2015, Stanford University.
17. Burgess, R.G., In the Field: An Introduction to Field Research. 1984, Routledge, New York.
18. Burlig, F., Improving transparency in observational social science research: a pre-analysis plan approach. Econ. Lett. 168 (2018), 56–60.
19. Burness, H.S., Gorman, W.D., Lansford, R.L., Economics, ethics, and the quantification of Indian water rights. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 65:1 (1983), 1027–1032.
20. Casey, K., Glennerster, R., Miguel, E., Reshaping institutions: evidence on aid impacts using a preanalysis plan. Quart. J. Econ. 127:4 (2012), 1755–1812.
21. CGIAR, 2004. How should the CGIAR handle ethical challenges? Issues and proposal for a strategic study. Technical report. Standing Panel on Priorities and Strategies (SPPS), CGIAR Science Council, Rome.
22. Chang, A.C., Li, P., A preanalysis plan to replicate sixty economics research papers that worked half of the time. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:5 (2017), 60–64.
23. Clark, J., Smith, R., 2015. Firm Action Needed on Predatory Journals. BMJ 350. < https://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.h210>.
24. Coffman, L.C., Niederle, M., Pre-analysis plans have limited upside, especially where replications are feasible. J. Econ. Perspect. 29:3 (2015), 81–98.
25. Coffman, L.C., Niederle, M., Wilson, A.J., A proposal to organize and promote replications. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:5 (2017), 41–45.
26. Colson, G., Corrigan, J.R., Grebitus, C., Loureiro, M.L., Rousu, M.C., Which deceptive practices, if any, should be allowed in experimental economics research? Results from surveys of applied experimental economists and students. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 98:2 (2016), 610–621.
27. Comstock, G., Research Ethics: A Philosophical Guide to the Responsible Conduct of Research. 2013, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
28. Das, N., Impact of participatory forestry program on sustainable rural livelihoods: lessons from an Indian province. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 34:3 (2012), 428–453.
29. Debertin, D.L., Luzar, E.J., Chambers, O.D., A protocol or a set of standards to guide agricultural economics research. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 20:1 (1995), 82–95.
30. DeMartino, G.F., McCloskey, D.N., Introduction, or why this handbook?. DeMartino, G.F., McCloskey, D.N., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics, 2016, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 3–10.
31. DeMartino, G.F., McCloskey, D.N., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics, 2016, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
32. der Merwe, M., Kirsten, J.F., Trienekens, J.H., Information sharing as a safeguard against the opportunistic behavior of South African Karoo lamb farmers. Agric. Econ. 48:S1 (2017), 101–111.
33. Dewald, W., Anderson, R., Replication and reflection: a decade at the Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking. Szenberg, M., Ramrattan, L., (eds.) Secrets of Economics Editors, 2014, MIT Press, Cambridge, 199–212.
34. Diaconis, P., Freedman, D., On rounding percentages. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74:366 (1979), 359–364.
35. Doleac, J.L., Mukherjee, A., 2018. The Moral Hazard of Lifesaving Innovations: Naloxone Access, Opioid Abuse, and Crime. SSRN Working Paper. < https://ssrn.com/abstract=3135264>.
36. Duflo, E., Banerjee, A., (eds.) Handbook of Field Experiments, vol. 1, 2017, North Holland, Amsterdam.
37. Duvendack, M., Palmer-Jones, R., Reed, W.R., What is meant by “replication” and why does it encounter resistence in economics?. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:5 (2017), 46–51.
38. Ehmke, M., Shogren, J.F., The experimental mindsent within development economics: proper use and handling are everything. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 32:4 (2010), 549–563.
39. Evans, D., 2015. Worm Wars: The Anthology. World Bank Development Impact Blog. < https://blogs.worldbank.org/impactevaluations/worm-wars-anthology>.
40. Fafchamps, M., Labonne, J., Using split samples to improve inference about causal effects. Polit. Anal. 25:4 (2017), 465–482.
41. Fanelli, D., 2018. Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it? PNAS.
42. Ferris, L.E., Winker, M.A., Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals. Biochem. Media 27:3 (2017), 279–284.
43. Freeman, A., First tell no untruth. DeMartino, G.F., McCloskey, D.N., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics, 2016, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 651–667.
44. Gasparyan, A.Y., Yessirkepov, M., Diyanova, S.N., Kitas, G.D., Publishing ethics and predatory practices: a dilemma for all stakeholders of science communication. J. Korean Med. Sci. 30:8 (2015), 1010–1016.
45. Glennerster, R., The practicalities of running randomized evaluations: partnerships, measurement, ethics, and transparency. Duflo, E., Banerjee, A., (eds.) Handbook of Field Experiments, vol. 1, 2017, North Holland, Amsterdam, 175–243.
46. Glennerster, R., Powers, S., Balancing risk and benefit: ethical tradeoffs in running randomized evaluations. DeMartino, G.F., McCloskey, D.N., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics, 2016, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
47. Goetz, S.J., Partridge, M.D., Stephens, H.M., The economic status of rural American in the President Trump Era and beyond. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 40:1 (2018), 97–118.
48. Goodwin, B.K., Agricultural policy analysis: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 97:2 (2015), 353–373.
49. Grove, J., Predatory Conferences ‘Now Outnumber Official Scholarly Events’. 2017, Times Higher Education.
50. Hamermesh, D., Replication in labor economics: evidence from data, and what it suggests. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:5 (2017), 37–40.
51. Hamermesh, D., Citations in economics: measurement, uses, and impacts. J. Econ. Lit. 56:1 (2018), 115–156.
52. Harvey, C.R., Liu, Y., Zhu, H., … and the cross-section of expected returns. Rev. Financ. Stud. 29:1 (2016), 5–68.
53. Heckman, J.J., Singer, B., Abducting economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:5 (2017), 298–302.
54. Hengel, E., 2017. Publishing while Female: Are Women held to Higher Standards? Evidence from Peer Review. Working Paper. < http://www.erinhengel.com/research/publishing_female.pdf>.
55. Höffler, J.H., Replication and economics journal policies. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:5 (2017), 52–55.
56. Israel, M., Hay, I., Research Ethics for Social Scientists. 2014, SAGE Publications.
57. Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184, 1964. Supreme Court of the United States.
58. Kassie, M., Holden, S., Sharecropping efficiency in Ethiopia: threats of eviction and kinship. Agric. Econ. 37:2–3 (2007), 179–188.
59. Kennedy, P.E., Sinning in the basement: What are the rules? The ten commandments of applied econometrics. J. Econ. Surv. 16:4 (2002), 569–589.
60. Konnikova, M., 2015. How a Gay-marriage Study went Wrong. The New Yorker. < https://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/how-a-gay-marriage-study-went-wrong>.
61. LaCour, M.J., Green, D.P., When contact changes mind: an experiment on transmission of support for gay equality. Science 346 (2014), 1366–1369 RETRACTED.
62. Latsis, S., Method and Appraisal in Economics. 1980, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
63. Leamer, E.E., Specification Searches: Ad Hoc Inference with Nonexperimental Data. 1978, Wiley, New York.
64. Leamer, E.E., Let's take the con out of econometrics. Am. Econ. Rev. 73:1 (1983), 31–43.
65. Lee, S.M., 2018. The Inside Story of how an Ivy League Food Scientist Turned Shoddy Data into Viral Studies. BuzzFeed News. < https://www.buzzfeed.com/stephaniemlee/brian-wansink-cornell-p-hacking?utm_term=.fonZ976GV#.boYVM035d>.
66. List, J.A., Shaikh, A.M., Xu, Y., Multiple Hypothesis Testing in Experimental Economics. Working Paper 21875. 2016, National Bureau of Economic Research.
67. Maki, U., Method and appraisal in economics, 1976-2006. J. Econ. Methodol. 15:4 (2008), 409–423.
68. Mayer, T., Honesty and integrity in econometrics. DeMartino, G.F., McCloskey, D.N., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics, 2016, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 329–351.
69. McCloskey, D., The loss function has been mislaid: the rhetoric of significance tests. Am. Econ. Rev. 75:2 (1985), 201–205.
70. McCluskey, J.J., Diversify or die: How increasing diversity of people and ideas can make organizations more competitive. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 98:2 (2016), 351–359.
71. McCorkle, B., Demographic influences on willingness to pay for cold tolerance technology. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 89:1 (2007), 1315–1323.
72. Mervis, J., 2017. Data Check: U.S. Government Share of basic Research Funding Falls below 50 percent. Science. < http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/03/data-check-us-government-share-basic-research-funding-falls-below-50>.
73. Miguel, E., Kremer, M., Worms: identifying impacts on education and health in the presence of treatment externalities. Econometrica 72:1 (2004), 159–217.
74. Oliver, P., The Students’ Guide to Research Ethics. 2003, Open University Press, Maidenhead.
75. Olken, B.A., Promises and perils of pre-analysis plans. J. Econ. Perspect. 29:3 (2015), 61–80.
76. Ozier, O., 2017. Trouble with pre-analysis plans? Try these three weird tricks. World Bank Development Impact Blog.
77. Peterson, E.W.F., Davis, G.C., Consequences, rights, and virtues: ethical foundations for applied economics. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 81:5 (1999), 1173–1180.
78. Pinstrup-Anderson, P., Ethics and economic policy for the food system. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 87:5 (2005), 1097–1112.
79. Romano, J.P., Wolf, M., Balanced control of generalized error rates. Ann. Stat. 38:1 (2010), 598–633.
80. Rousu, M.C., Colson, G., Corrigan, J.R., Grebitus, C., Loureiro, M.L., Deception in experiments: towards guidelines on use in applied economics research. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 37:3 (2015), 524–536.
81. Ruttan, V., Moral responsibility in agricultural research. Southern J. Agric. Econ. 15:1 (1983), 7–80.
82. Schick, E.B., The credibility crisis in higher education. Educ. Theory 21:4 (1971), 396–405.
83. Sen, A., On Ethics and Economics. 1999, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
84. Silver, A., Controversial website that lists predatory publishers shuts down. Nature, 2017.
85. Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J.P., Nelson, L.D., 2015. Specification Curve: Descriptive and Inferential Statistics on all Reasonable Specifications. Available at SSRN: < https://ssrn.com/abstract=2694998> or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2694998.
86. Smith, W.I., Antitrust enforcement: the States can do it, even if the Feds won't. Choices, 5(4), 1990.
87. Stiglitz, J.E., Ethics, economic advice, and economic policy. DeMartino, G.F., McCloskey, D.N., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics, 2016, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 495–519.
88. Sukhtankar, S., Replications in development economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:5 (2017), 32–36.
89. Swinton, S.M., Why should I believe your applied economics. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 100:2 (2018), 381–391.
90. Thompson, D.F., Professional disequilibrium: conflict of interest in economics. DeMartino, G.F., McCloskey, D.N., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics, 2016, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 455–474.
91. Twain, M., Chapters from my Autobiography. 1906, North American Review DXCVIII.
92. United States, 1978. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Technical report. The Commission, Bethesda.
93. Vivalt, E., 2017. How much can we Generalize from Impact Evaluations? Mimeo, Australian National University.
94. Wible, J.R., Scientific misconduct and the responsible conduct of research in science and economics. Rev. Soc. Econ. 74:1 (2016), 7–32.
95. Yalcintas, A., Wible, J.R., Scientific misconduct and research ethics in economics: an introduction. Rev. Soc. Econ. 74:1 (2016), 1–6.
96. Zingales, L., Preventing economist capture. Carpenter, D., Moss, D., (eds.) Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit it, 2013, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 124–151.