Diversify or Die: How Increasing Diversity of People and Ideas Can Make Organizations More Competitive

American Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 351-359

  McCluskey, Jill J ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS; COMPETITIVENESS; EDUCATION; KNOWLEDGE;

EID: 84966297087     PISSN: 00029092     EISSN: 14678276     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aav100     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Becker, G.S. 2010. The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Bertrand, M. and S. Mullainathan. 2004. Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination. American Economic Review 94 (4): 991-1013.
3. Ceci, S.J., D.K. Ginther, S. Kahn, and W.M. Williams. 2014. Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 15 (3): 75-141.
4. Chen, W. and J.J. McCluskey. 2015. Expectation Bias and Gender. Working paper.
5. Food and Agricultural Education Information System (FAEIS). 2013. Faculty Headcount in U.S. Agricultural Economics, Agricultural Business and Management All Institutions. http://www.faeis.ahnrit.vt.edu/ (accessed February 20, 2015).
6. Fox, M.F. 2005. Gender, Family Characteristics, and Publication Productivity Among Scientists. Social Studies of Science 35 (1): 131-50.
7. Ginther, D.K. Forthcoming. Women's Careers in Academic Social Science: Progress, Pitfalls and Plateaus. In The Economics of Economists, ed. A. Lanteri and J. Vromen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Hill, C., C. Corbett, and A. St. Rose. 2010. Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington: American Association of University Women (AAUW).
9. Juraqulova, Z., J.J. McCluskey, and R. Mittelhammer. 2015. The Impact of Work-Life Policies on Female Faculty Representation in U.S. Doctoral-Granting Economics Departments. Working paper.
10. Kahn, S. 1995. Women in the Economics Profession. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4): 193-206.
11. Rosser, V. 2004. Using POWRE to ADVANCE: Institutional Barriers Identified By Women Scientist and Engineers. NWSA Journal 16 (1): 50-78.
12. Sandberg, S. 2013. Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead (First edition.) New York: Knopf.
13. Scheibinger, L., A.D. Henderson, and S.K. Gilmartin. 2008. Dual-Career Academic Couples: What Universities Need to Know. The Clayman Institute for Gender Research: Stanford University. http://gender.stanford.edu/dual-career-research-report (accessed January 7, 2016).
14. Steinpreis, R.E., K.A. Anders, and D. Ritzke. 1999. The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study. Sex Roles 41: 509-28.
15. Stewart, A. and D. Lavaque-Manty. 2008. Advancing Women Faculty in Science and Engineering: An Effort in Institutional Transformation. In Gender and Occupational Outcomes, ed. H.M.G. Watt and J.S. Eccles, 299-322. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16. Surowieki, J. 2004. The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Random House.
17. Woolstenhulme, J., B. Cowan, J.J. McCluskey, and T. Byington. 2014. Evaluating the Two-Body Problem: Joint Hire Productivity within a University. Working paper, Washington State University.
18. Xie, Y. and K.A. Shauman. 2003. Women in Science: Career Process and Outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.