Flesh matters: The body in cognition

Mind and Language

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2019, Pages 3-20

  Shapiro, Lawrence A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

body relativity; embodied cognition; extended cognition; extended mind; functionalism

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050701472     PISSN: 02681064     EISSN: 14680017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/mila.12203     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adams, F. & Aizawa, K. (2001). The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14, 43–64.
2. Adams, F. & Aizawa, K. (2008). The bounds of cognition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
3. Adams, F. & Aizawa, K. (2010). Defending the bounds of cognition. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 67–80). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Ballard, D., Hayhoe, M., Pook, P. & Rao, R. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 723–767.
5. Block, N. (1978). Troubles with functionalism. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 9, 261–325.
6. Burge, T. (1979). Individualism and the mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 4, 73–121.
7. Burge, T. (1986). Individualism and psychology. The Philosophical Review, 95, 3–45.
8. Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 351–367.
9. Casasanto, D. (2011). Different bodies, different minds: The body specificity of language and thought. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 378–383.
10. Casasanto, D. (2014). Body relativity. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 108–117). Oxon: Routledge.
11. Casasanto, D. & Chrysikou, E. (2011). When left is ‘right’: Motor fluency shapes abstract concepts. Psychological Science, 20, 1–4.
12. Chalmers, D. (2008). Foreword to Andy Clark's Supersizing the Mind. In A. Clark (Ed.), Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension (pp. 1–8). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Clark, A. (2008). Pressing the flesh: A tension in the study of the embodied, embedded mind? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 76, 38–59.
14. Clark, A. (2010). Memento's revenge: The extended mind extended. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 43–66). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. De la Vega, I., Filippis, M., Lachmair, M., Dudschig, C. & Kaup, B. (2011). Emotional valence and physical space: Limits of interaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 375–385.
16. Glenberg, A. & Kaschak, M. (2002). Groundinglanguage in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565.
17. Glenberg, A., Sato, M. & Cattaneo, L. (2008). Use-induced motor plasticity affects the processing of abstract and concrete language. Current Biology, 18, R290–R291.
18. Havas, D., Glenberg, A., Gutowski, K., Lucarelli, M. & Davidson, R. (2010). Cosmetic use of botulinum toxin-a affects processing of emotional language. Psychological Science, 21, 895–900.
19. Havas, D., Glenberg, A. & Rinck, M. (2007). Emotion simulation during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 436–441.
20. Hurley, S. (1998). Consciousness in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
22. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
23. Menary, R. (2007). Cognitive integration: Mind and cognition unbounded. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
24. Millikan, R. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Ping, R., Dhillon, S. & Beilock, S. (2009). Reach for what you like: The body's role in shaping preferences. Emotion Review, 1, 140–150.
26. Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576–582.
27. Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of ‘meaning’. In H. Putnam (Ed.), Mind, language, and reality: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2, pp. 215–271). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28. Rupert, R. (2004). Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition. Journal of Philosophy, 101, 389–428.
29. Shapiro, L. (2004). The mind incarnate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Shapiro, L. (2009). Review of Adams, F. & Aizawa, K. The Bounds of Cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 267–273.
31. Shapiro, L. (2011). Embodied cognition. New York, NY: Routledge.
32. Strack, F., Martin, L. & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 768–777.
33. Tucker, M. & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830–846.
34. Willems, R., Labruna, L., D'Esposito, M., Ivry, R. & Casasanto, D. (2011). A functional role for the motor system in language understanding: Evidence from theta-burst TMS. Psychological Science, 22, 849–854.
35. Wilson, R. (2010). Extended vision. In N. Gangopadhyay, M. Madary & F. Spicer (Eds.), Perception, action and consciousness (pp. 277–290). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36. Wilson, R. & Clark, A. (2009). How to situate cognition: Letting nature take its course. In M. Aydede & P. Robbins (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 55–77). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Wilson, R. & Foglia, L. (2017). Embodied cognition. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 ed.) Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/embodied-cognition/