Strategies for the prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications

Anaesthesia

Volumn 73, Issue 8, 2018, Pages 923-927

  Charlesworth, M ^a   Glossop, A J ^b  

^a WYTHENSHAWE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

database analysis; pressure controlled ventilation; retrospective studies; volume controlled ventilation

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; HYPOXEMIA; INTUBATION; LUNG COMPLIANCE; LUNG DISEASE; LUNG EDEMA; LUNG INJURY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PNEUMONIA; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRESSURE CONTROLLED VENTILATION; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIDAL VOLUME; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; VOLUME CONTROLLED VENTILATION; INTERMITTENT POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION; LUNG;

HUMANS; INTERMITTENT POSITIVE-PRESSURE VENTILATION; LUNG;

EID: 85050156742     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/anae.14288     Document Type: Editorial

References (24)

1. Bagchi A, Rudolph MI, Ng PY, et al. The association of postoperative pulmonary complications in 109,360 patients with pressure-controlled or volume-controlled ventilation. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 1334–43.
2. McGuckin D. Mechanical ventilation mode and postoperative pulmonary complications. Anaesthesia 2018; 73: 252–3.
3. Riordan J, Stedmon J. Postoperative pulmonary complications and thoracic patients. Anaesthesia 2018; 73: 393–4.
4. Neto AS, Hemmes SNT, Barbas CSV, et al. Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Respiratory Medicine 2016; 4: 272–80.
5. Ladha K, Melo MFV, McLean DJ, et al. Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation and risk of postoperative respiratory complications: hospital based registry study. British Medical Journal 2015; 351: h3646.
6. Güldner A, Kiss T, Serpa Neto A, et al. Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications: a comprehensive review of the role of tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, and lung recruitment maneuvers. Anesthesiology 2015; 123: 692–713.
7. Chacko B, Peter JV, Tharyan P, John G, Jeyaseelan L. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation for acute respiratory failure due to acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015; 1: CD008807.
8. Jammer I, Wickboldt N, Sander M, et al. Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2015; 32: 88–105.
9. Mills GH. Respiratory complications of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2018; 73: 25–33.
10. Choi SW, Cheung CW. The case of the misleading composite – one outcome is better than two. Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 1101–3.
11. Futier E, Constantin J-M, Paugam-Burtz C, et al. A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. New England Journal of Medicine 2013; 369: 428–37.
12. Hemmes SN, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ. High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during general anaesthesia for open abdominal surgery (PROVHILO trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2014; 384: 495–503.
13. Barbosa FT, Castro AA, de Sousa-Rodrigues CF. Positive end-expiratory pressure during anaesthesia for prevention of mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014: CD007922.
14. Sutherasan Y, Vargas M, Pelosi P. Protective mechanical ventilation in the non-injured lung: review and meta-analysis. Critical Care 2014; 18: 211.
15. Verbeek GL, Myles PS, Westall GP, et al. Intra-operative protective mechanical ventilation in lung transplantation: a randomised, controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 993–1004.
16. Moore JA, Conway DH, Thomas N, Cummings D, Atkinson D. Impact of a peri-operative quality improvement programme on postoperative pulmonary complications. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 317–27.
17. Glossop AJ, Shepherd N, Bryden DC, Mills GH. Non-invasive ventilation for weaning, avoiding reintubation after extubation and in the postoperative period: a meta-analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2012; 109: 305–14.
18. Futier E, Paugam-Burtz C, Godet T, et al. Effect of early postextubation high-flow nasal cannula vs conventional oxygen therapy on hypoxaemia in patients after major abdominal surgery: a French multicentre randomised controlled trial (OPERA). Intensive Care Medicine 2016; 42: 1888–98.
19. Stéphan F, Barrucand B, Petit P, et al. High-flow nasal oxygen vs noninvasive positive airway pressure in hypoxemic patients after cardiothoracic surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 2015; 313: 2331–9.
20. Cassidy MR, Rosenkranz P, McCabe K, Rosen JE, McAneny D. I COUGH: reducing postoperative pulmonary complications with a multidisciplinary patient care program. Journal of the American Medical Association Surgery 2013; 148: 740–5.
21. McLintic AJ, Irwin MG. Is the jury out on consensus opinion? Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 256–60.
22. Murray D. What should we do when traditional research fails? Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 1059–63.
23. Smith AF, Choi SW. Major trauma and the need for massive transfusion. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 1299–301.
24. Carlisle JB. Whose fault are wrong predictions: the clinician, the patient or the pigeon? Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 1438–43.