Mechanical ventilation mode and postoperative pulmonary complications

Anaesthesia

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 252-253

  McGuckin, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; ETHNICITY; LETTER; LUNG COMPLIANCE; LUNG DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SPIROMETRY; HUMAN; LUNG; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;

HUMANS; LUNG; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 85040677042     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/anae.14195     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Bagchi A, Rudolph MI, Ng PY, et al. The association of postoperative pulmonary complications in 109,360 patients with pressure-controlled or volume-controlled ventilation. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 1334–43.
2. Woodall N, Cook TM. National census of airway management techniques used for anaesthesia in the UK: first phase of the Fourth National Audit Project at the Royal College of Anaesthetists. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2017; 106: 266–71.
3. Jiang J, Li B, Kang N, Wu A, Yue Y. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation for surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2016; 30: 501–4.
4. Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, et al. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 1338–50.