Participatory urban informatics: towards citizen-ability

Smart and Sustainable Built Environment

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 4-19

  Foth, Marcus ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Citizen co creation; Collaborative citymaking; Interaction design; Participation; Smart cities; Urban informatics

Indexed keywords

CITIZEN CO-CREATION; CO-CREATION; COLLABORATIVE CITYMAKING; CRITICAL REVIEW; DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH; INTERACTION DESIGN; PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL RESEARCH; TECHNICAL RESEARCH; URBAN INFORMATICS;

SMART CITY;

DESIGN; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; SMART CITY; URBAN AREA;

EID: 85049878812     PISSN: 20466099     EISSN: 20466102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/sasbe-10-2017-0051     Document Type: Article

References (111)

1. Abrams, D. (1996), The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World, Vintage, New York, NY, p. 79
2. Aiginger, K., Schratzenstaller, M., Leoni, T., Schaffartzik, A., Wiedenhofer, D., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Veugelers, R. and Behrens, A. (2016), “Europe’s path towards the socio-ecological transition”, Intereconomics, Vol. 51 No. 4, p. 184, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-016-0599-6
3. Alexander, S. (2016), “A prosperous descent: telling new stories as the Old Book Closes”, Griffith Review, Vol. 52, pp. 4-24
4. Aoki, P.M., Honicky, R.J., Mainwaring, A., Myers, C., Paulos, E., Subramanian, S. and Woodruff, A. (2009), “A vehicle for research: using street sweepers to explore the landscape of environmental community action”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, pp. 375-384
5. Bannon, L. (1992), “From human factors to human actors: the role of psychology and human-computer interaction studies in system design”, in Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. (Eds), Design at Work, L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 25-44
6. Bassoli, A., Brewer, J., Martin, K., Dourish, P. and Mainwaring, S. (2007), “Underground aesthetics: rethinking urban computing”, IEEE Pervasive Computing, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 39-45
7. Baumeister, R.F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C. and Vohs, K.D. (2001), “Bad is stronger than good”, Review of General Psychology: Journal of Division 1, of the American Psychological Association, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 323-370
8. Beer, D. and Burrows, R. (2007), “Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: some initial considerations”, Sociological Research Online, Vol. 12 No. 5, available at: www.socresonline.org.uk/12/5/17.html
9. Bilandzic, M. and Foth, M. (2012), “A review of locative media, mobile and embodied spatial interaction”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 70 No. 1, pp. 66-71
10. Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P. and Hillgren, P.-A. (2010), “Participatory design and democratizing innovation”, Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, ACM, pp. 41-50
11. Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P. and Hillgren, P.-A. (2012), “Agonistic participatory design: working with marginalised social movements”, CoDesign, Vol. 8 Nos 2-3, pp. 127-144
12. Blomkvist, S. (2002), “The user as a personality-using personas as a tool for design”, position paper for the course workshop “Theoretical perspectives in Human-Computer Interaction” at IPLab, KTH—Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 3 September
13. Bradbury, H. (2015), The SAGE Handbook of Action Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California
14. Brody, S.D., Godschalk, D.R. and Burby, R.J. (2003), “Mandating citizen participation in plan making: six strategic planning choices”, Journal of the American Planning Association., Vol. 69 No. 3, pp. 245-264
15. Burby, R.J. (2003), “Making plans that matter: citizen involvement and government action”, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 69 No. 1, pp. 33-49
16. Caldwell, G.A. and Foth, M. (2014), “DIY media architecture: open and participatory approaches to community engagement”, Proceedings of the 2nd Media Architecture Biennale Conference, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 1-10
17. Caldwell, G.A. and Foth, M. (2017), “Media architecture: using information and media as construction material”, in Wiethoff, A. and Hussmann, H. (Eds), DIY/DIWO Media Architecture: The InstaBooth, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, Berlin, pp. 61-80
18. Caldwell, G.A., Osborne, L., Mewburn, I. and Crowther, P. (2015), “Guerrillas in the (Urban) midst: developing and using creative research methods—guerrilla research tactics”, Journal of Urban Technology, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 21-36
19. Calzada, I. (2013), “Critical social innovation in the smart city Era for a city-regional European Horizon 2020”, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2506952 (accessed 4 April 2017)
20. Camacho, T., Foth, M. and Rakotonirainy, A. (2013), “Pervasive technology and public transport: opportunities beyond telematics”, IEEE Pervasive Computing, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 18-25
21. Camacho, T., Foth, M., Rakotonirainy, A. and Rittenbruch, M. (2017), “Understanding urban rail in-vehicle activities: an activity theory approach”, Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 46, Part A, pp. 70-86
22. Camacho, T., Foth, M., Rittenbruch, M. and Rakotonirainy, A. (2015), “TrainYarn: probing perceptions of social space in urban commuter trains”, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (OZCHI), ACM, pp. 455-464
23. Camacho, T., Foth, M., Rakotonirainy, A., Rittenbruch, M. and Bunker, J. (2016), “The role of passenger-centric innovation in the future of public transport”, Public Transport, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 453-475
24. Carayannis, E.G., Barth, T.D. and Campbell, D.F.J. (2012), “The quintuple helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation”, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 1-12, doi: 10.1186/2192-5372-1-2
25. Cicada (2016), “Cicada: a distributed direct democracy and decentralized application platform”, available at: https://github.com/the-laughing-monkey/cicada-platform/blob/master/Cicada-WhitePaper-2016-10.13.GA.1.pdf (accessed 22 June 2018)
26. Cox, A.L., Gould, S.J.J., Cecchinato, M.E., Iacovides, I. and Renfree, I. (2016), “Design frictions for mindful interactions: the case for microboundaries”, Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, pp. 1389-1397
27. Davison, A. (2004), “Reinhabiting technology: ends in means and the practice of place”, Technology in Society, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 85-97
28. Dick, B. (2002), “Building agreement from disagreement: the anatomy of dialectical processes”, Interchange, Chapel Hill
29. DiSalvo, C. (2012), Adversarial Design, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
30. DiSalvo, C. and Lukens, J. (2011), “Nonanthropocentrism and the nonhuman in design: possibilities for designing new forms of engagement with and through technology”, in Foth, M., Forlano, L., Satchell, C. and Gibbs, M. (Eds), From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen: Urban Informatics, Social Media, Ubiquitous Computing, and Mobile Technology to Support Citizen Engagement, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, p. 421
31. Finn, D. (2014), “DIY urbanism: implications for cities”, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 381-398
32. Forlano, L. (2009), “Codespaces: community wireless networks and the reconfiguration of cities”, in Foth, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, pp. 292-309
33. Forlano, L. (2016), “Decentering the human in the design of collaborative cities”, Design Issues, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 42-54
34. Foth, M. (2016), “Why we should design smart cities for getting lost”, in Watson, J. (Ed.), The Conversation Yearbook 2016: 50 Standout Articles from Australia’s Top Thinkers, Melbourne, University Press, Melbourne, pp. 109-113
35. Foth, M. (2017), “The next urban paradigm: cohabitation in the smart city”, Information Technology, Vol. 59 No. 6, pp. 259-262, available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/itit-2017-0034
36. Foth, M. and Adkins, B. (2006), “A research design to build effective partnerships between city planners, developers, government and urban neighbourhood communities”, The Journal of Community Informatics, Vol. 2 No. 2, available at: http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/viewArticle/292 (accessed 1 May 2016)
37. Foth, M. and Axup, J. (2006), “Participatory design and action research: identical twins or synergetic pair?”, in Jacucci, G., Kensing, F., Wagner, I. and Blomberg, J. (Eds), Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, Trento, pp. 93-96
38. Foth, M. and Brynskov, M. (2016), “Participatory action research for civic engagement”, in Gordon, E. and Mihailidis, P. (Eds), Civic Media: Technology, Design, Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 563-580
39. Foth, M., Brynskov, M. and Ojala, T. (2015), Citizen’s Right to the Digital City: Urban Interfaces, Activism, and Placemaking, Springer
40. Foth, M., Parra Agudelo, L. and Palleis, R. (2013), “Digital soapboxes: towards an interaction design agenda for situated civic innovation”, Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication, ACM, pp. 725-728
41. Foth, M., Schroeter, R. and Ti, J. (2013), “Opportunities of public transport experience enhancements with mobile services and Urban screens”, International Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 1-18
42. Foth, M., Forlano, L., Satchell, C. and Gibbs, M. (2011), From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen: Urban Informatics, Social Media, Ubiquitous Computing, and Mobile Technology to Support Citizen Engagement, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
43. Foth, M., Tomitsch, M., Satchell, C. and Haeusler, M.H. (2015), “From users to citizens: some thoughts on designing for polity and civics”, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction, ACM, pp. 623-633
44. Fredericks, J. and Foth, M. (2013), “Augmenting public participation: enhancing planning outcomes through the use of social media and web 2.0”, Australian Planner, Vol. 50 No. 3, pp. 244-256
45. Fredericks, J., Caldwell, G.A. and Tomitsch, M. (2016), “Middle-out design: collaborative community engagement in urban HCI”, Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI), ACM, pp. 200-204
46. Fredericks, J., Caldwell, G.A., Foth, M. and Tomitsch, M. (2018), “The city as perpetual beta: fostering systemic urban acupuncture”, in de Lange, M. and de Waal, M. (Eds), The Hackable City: Digital Media & Collaborative Citymaking in the Network Society, Berlin, Springer, available at: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/107240/ (accessed 7 August 2017)
47. Fry, T. (2003), “The dialectic of sustainment”, Design Philosophy Papers, Vol. 1 No. 5, pp. 289-297
48. Fry, T. (2009), Design Futuring: Sustainability, Ethics and New Practice, Bloomsbury Academic, Berg Publishers, Oxford
49. Fry, T. (2011), “Time and the political: post-urban futures, chronophobia and unsettlement”, Design Philosophy Papers, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 93-101
50. Giaccardi, E., Cila, N., Speed, C. and Caldwell, M. (2016), “Thing ethnography: doing design research with non-humans”, Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM, London, pp. 377-387
51. Giaccardi, E., Speed, C., Cila, N. and Caldwell, M.L. (2016), “Design anthropological futures”, in Smith, R.C., Vangkilde, K.T., Kjærsgaard, M.G., Otto, T., Halse, J. and Binder, T. (Eds), Things as Co-Ethnographers: Implications of a Thing Perspective for Design and Anthropology, Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 235-248
52. Goffman, E. (1972/2009), Relations in Public, Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, New Jersey, NJ
53. Gordon, E. and de Souza e Silva, A. (2011), Net Locality: Why Location Matters in a Networked World, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
54. Graham, S. (2004), “Beyond the ‘dazzling light’: from dreams of transcendence to the ‘remediation’ of urban life”, New Media & Society, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 16-25
55. Greenbaum, J.M. and Kyng, M. (1991), Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, p. 294
56. Guest, D. (1991), “The hunt is on for the renaissance man of computing”, The Independent, 17 September, Vol. 17
57. Hakken, D., Teli, M. and Andrews, B. (2015), Beyond Capital: Values, Commons, Computing, and the Search for a Viable Future, Routledge, New York, NY
58. Hampton, K.N., Livio, O. and Sessions, L. (2010), “The social life of wireless urban spaces: internet use, social networks, and the public realm”, The Journal of Communication, Vol. 60 No. 4, pp. 701-722
59. Hardey, M. (2007), “The city in the age of Web 2.0: a new synergistic relationship between place and people”, Information, Communication and Society, Vol. 10 No. 6, pp. 867-884
60. Harrison, S., Tatar, D. and Sengers, P. (2007), “The three paradigms of HCI”, Proceedings of CHI, Alt.chi, ACM, New York, NY, 28 April-3 May, 2007
61. Harvey, D. (2012), Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution, Verso, Brooklyn, NY
62. Healey, P. (1992), “Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory”, The Town Planning Review, Vol. 63 No. 2, pp. 143-162
63. Healey, P. (1996), “The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation”, Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 217-234
64. Hearn, G. and Foth, M. (2005), “Action research in the design of new media and ICT systems”, in Kwansah-Aidoo, K. (Ed.), Topical Issues in Communications and Media Research, Nova Science, New York, NY, pp. 79-94
65. Hearn, G. and Foth, M. (2007), “Communicative ecologies: editorial preface”, Electronic Journal of Communication, Vol. 17 Nos 1-2, available at: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/8171/ (accessed 17 November 2016)
66. Hornecker, E., Halloran, J., Fitzpatrick, G., Weal, M., Millard, D., Michaelides, D., Cruickshank, D. and Roure, D.D. (2006), “UbiComp in opportunity spaces: challenges for participatory design”, Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Participatory Design: Expanding Boundaries in Design—Vol. 1, PDC 6, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 47-56, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1147261.1147269
67. Houghton, K., Foth, M. and Miller, E. (2015), “Urban acupuncture: hybrid social and technological practices for hyperlocal placemaking”, Journal of Urban Technology, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 3-19
68. Houghton, K., Miller, E. and Foth, M. (2014), “Integrating ICT into the planning process: impacts, opportunities and challenges”, Australian Planner, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 24-33
69. Huh, J., Ackerman, M.S., Erickson, T., Harrison, S. and Sengers, P. (2007), “Beyond usability: taking social, situational, cultural, and other contextual factors into account”, CHI ’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, pp. 2113-2116
70. Irwin, T. (2015), “Transition design: a proposal for a new area of design practice, study, and research”, Design and Culture, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 229-246
71. Irwin, T., Kossoff, G. and Tonkinwise, C. (2015), “Transition design provocation”, Design Philosophy Papers, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 3-11
72. Ishida, T. and Isbister, K. (2000), “Digital cities: technologies, experiences, and future perspectives”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1765, Springer, Heidelberg, p. 444
73. Iveson, K. (2010), “The wars on graffiti and the new military urbanism”, City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, Vol. 14, Nos 1-2, pp. 115-134
74. Iveson, K. (2013), “Cities within the city: do-it-yourself urbanism and the right to the city”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 941-956
75. Jacobs, J. (1961), The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Vintage Books, New York, NY
76. Jeremijenko, N. (2016), “Creative agency and the space race of the 21st century: towards a museum of natural futures”, Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM, pp. 3-4
77. Kidder, J.L. (2012), “Parkour, the affective appropriation of urban space, and the real/virtual dialectic”, City & Community, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 229-253
78. Kindberg, T., Chalmers, M. and Paulos, E. (2007), “Guest Editors’ introduction: urban computing”, IEEE Pervasive Computing, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 18-20
79. Laurian, L. and Shaw, M.M. (2009), “Evaluation of public participation: the practices of certified planners”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 293-309
80. Lefebvre, H. (1996), “The right to the city”, in Kofman, E. and Lebas, E. (Eds), Writings on Cities, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 63-181
81. Leydesdorff, L. (2012), “The triple helix, quadruple helix, …, and an n-tuple of helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy?”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 25-35
82. Luusua, A., Ylipulli, J. and Rönkkö, E. (2017), “Nonanthropocentric design and smart cities in the anthropocene”, Information Technology, Vol. 59 No. 6, pp. 299-304
83. Manzini, E. (2009), “A cosmopolitan localism: prospects for a sustainable local development and the possible role of design”, in Clark, H. and Brody, D. (Eds), Design Studies: A Reader, Berg, New York, NY, p. 448
84. Milgram, S. (1972/1992), The Individual in a Social World: Essays and Experiments, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
85. Monk, A. and Howard, S. (1998), “The rich picture: a tool for reasoning about work context”, ACM SIGCHI Interactions, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 21-30
86. Paulos, E. and Goodman, E. (2004), “The familiar stranger: anxiety, comfort, and play in public places”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, pp. 223-230
87. Paulos, E., Honicky, R.J. and Hooker, B. (2009), “Citizen science: enabling participatory urbanism”, in Foth, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, pp. 414-436
88. Reason, P. (1998), “Political, epistemological, ecological and spiritual dimensions of participation”, Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 147-167
89. Reynolds, R. (2014), On Guerrilla Gardening: A Handbook for Gardening without Boundaries, Bloomsbury Publishing, London
90. Rogers, Y. (2009), “The changing face of human-computer interaction in the age of ubiquitous computing”, in Holzinger, A. and Miesenberger, K. (Eds), HCI and Usability for E-Inclusion, Vol. 5889, Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, pp. 1-19
91. Sager, T. (2009), “Planners’ role: torn between dialogical ideals and neo-liberal realities”, European Planning Studies, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 65-84
92. Scharl, A. and Tochtermann, K. (2007), The Geospatial Web How Geobrowsers, Social Software and the Web 2.0 Are Shaping the Network Society, Springer, London
93. Schroeter, R. and Foth, M. (2009), “Discussions in space”, Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7, ACM, pp. 381-384
94. Schroeter, R., Foth, M. and Satchell, C. (2012), “People, content, location: sweet spotting urban screens for situated engagement”, Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, ACM, pp. 146-155
95. Schuler, D. (2013), “Creating the world citizen parliament: seven challenges for interaction designers”, Interactions, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 38-47
96. Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. (1993), Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 319pp
97. Seeburger, J., Foth, M. and Tjondronegoro, D. (2010), “Capital music: personal expression with a public display of song choice”, Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, ACM, pp. 777-780
98. Seeburger, J., Foth, M. and Tjondronegoro, D. (2015), “Digital design interventions for creating new presentations of self in public urban places”, in Foth, M., Brynskov, M. and Ojala, T. (Eds), Citizen’s Right to the Digital City, Springer, Singapore, pp. 3-21
99. Shaw, J. and Graham, M. (Eds) (2016), Our Digital Rights to the City, Meatspace Press, Oxford
100. Shepard, M. (2011), Sentient City: Ubiquitous Computing, Architecture, and the Future of Urban Space, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
101. Shklovski, I. and Chang, M.F. (2006), “Guest editors’ introduction: urban computing—navigating space and context”, Computer, Vol. 39 No. 9, pp. 36-37
102. Sliwa, M. and Cairns, G. (2007), “Exploring narratives and antenarratives of graffiti artists: beyond dichotomies of commitment and detachment”, Culture and Organization, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 73-82
103. Smith, N., Bardzell, S. and Bardzell, J. (2017), “Designing for cohabitation: naturecultures, hybrids, and decentering the human in design”, Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI ’17, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 1714-1725, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025948
104. Ti, J.T.H. (2014), “Urban informatics and public transport”, in Gardner, N., Haeusler, M.H. and Mahar, B. (Eds), Interchanging: Future Scenarios for Responsive Transport Infrastructure Design, Spurbuchverlag, Baunach, pp. 91-95
105. Toprak, C., Platt, J., Ho, H.Y. and Mueller, F. (2013), “Cart-load-o-fun: designing digital games for trams”, CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, pp. 2877-2878
106. Traunmueller, M., Fatah gen. Schieck, A., Schöning, J. and Brumby, D.P. (2013), “The path is the reward: considering social networks to contribute to the pleasure of urban strolling”, CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, pp. 919-924
107. Wallace, J. (2013), “Yarn bombing, knit graffiti and underground brigades: a study of craftivism and mobility”, Journal of Mobile Media: Sound Moves, Vol. 7 No. 1
108. Wallin, S., Horelli, L. and Saad-Sulonen, J. (2010), Digital Tools in Participatory Planning, Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, Aalto University, Espoo
109. Whyte, W.H. (1980), The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces, Project for Public Spaces, New York, NY
110. Ylipulli, J., Suopajärvi, T., Ojala, T., Kostakos, V. and Kukka, H. (2014), “Municipal wifi and interactive displays: appropriation of new technologies in public urban spaces”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 89, pp. 145-160
111. Zuckerman, E. (2011), “Desperately seeking serendipity”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’11), ACM, New York, NY, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.2167183, available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.2167183