Decentering the human in the design of collaborative cities

Design Issues

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 42-54

  Forlano, Laura ^a  

^a ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978401521     PISSN: 07479360     EISSN: 15314790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/DESI_a_00398     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. See Oxford Dictionaries online, http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/liminal (accessed June 22, 2015).
2. Laura Forlano, “Work and the Open Source City,” Urban Omnibus (June 3, 2009), http://urbanomnibus.net/2009/06/work-and-the-open-source-city/
3. Laura Forlano, “Building the Open Source City: New Work Environments for Collaboration and Innovation,” in From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen, Marcus Foth et al., eds. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011).
4. Carl DiSalvo and Jonathan Lukens, “Seeing the City through Machines: Non-Anthropocentric Design and Youth Robotics,” in Digital Cities 6: Concepts, Methods and Systems of Urban Informatics, Marcus Foth, Laura Forlano, and Hiromitsu Hattori, eds. (State College: Penn State University Press, 2009)
5. Carl DiSalvo and Jonathan Lukens, “Nonathropocentrism and the Nonhuman in Design: Possibilities for Designing New Forms of Engagement with and through Technology,” in From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen: Urban Informatics, Social Media, Ubiquitous Computing, and Mobile Technology to Support Citizen Engagement, Marcus Foth et al., eds. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011).
6. Laura Forlano, “Digital Materiality and the New Geographies of Media Cities” (paper presented at MediaCities, Buffalo, NY, 2013)
7. Paul Dourish and Genevieve Bell, Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011)
8. Laura Forlano, “Making Waves: Urban Technology and the Coproduction of Place,” First Monday 18, no. 11 (2013).
9. Jerry Kang and Dana Cuff, “Pervasive Computing: Embedding the Public Sphere,” Washington and Lee Law Review 65 (2005).
10. Tony Fry has discussed the social construction of need and the role of designers in generating needs in Tony Fry, “Against an Essential Theory of ‘Need’: Some Considerations for Design Theory,” Design Issues 8, no. 2 (Spring 1992).
11. Ilpo Koskinen et al., Design Research through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom (New York: Elsevier, 2011).
12. Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers, “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design,” CoDesign 4, no. 1 (2008)
13. Douglas Schuler and Aki Namioka, Participatory Design: Principles and Practices (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, 1993)
14. Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby, Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013).
15. Peter-Paul Verbeek and Petran Kockelkoren, “The Things That Matter,” Design Issues 14, no. 3 (Summer 1998): 1.
16. E. Woodhouse and J. Patton, “Design by Society: Science and Technology Studies and the Social Shaping of Design,” Design Issues 20, no. 3 (Summer 2004): 2–3.
17. Jesse S. Tatum, “The Challenge of Responsible Design,” Design Issues 20, no. 3 (Summer 2004), 66–80.
18. Geoff Mulgan, “Social Innovation: What It Is, Why It Matters and How It Can Be Accelerated,” Young Foundation, Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, Oxford Said Business School, 2007.
19. Jack Ingram, Elizabeth Shove, and Matthew Watson, “Products and Practices: Selected Concepts from Science and Technology Studies and from Social Theories of Consumption and Practice,” Design Issues 23, no. 2 (Spring 2007).
20. Bruno Latour, Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
21. Trevor J. Pinch and Wiebe E. Bijker, “The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other,” Social Studies of Science 14, no. 3 (1984)
22. Marc Steen, “Human-Centered Design as a Fragile Encounter,” Design Issues 28, no. 1 (Winter 2012): 1.
23. Bruce Archer, “The Nature of Research,” Co-Design 2, no. 11 (1995)
24. Richard Buchanan, “Declaration by Design: Rhetoric, Argument, and Demonstration in Design Practice,” Design Issues 2, no. 1 (Spring 1985)
25. Christopher Frayling, Research in Art and Design (London: Royal College of Art London, 1993)
26. J. Bardzell, S. Bardzell, and L. K. Hansen, “Immodest Proposals: Research through Design and Knowledge” (paper presented at the CHI’15: World Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Korea, 2015).
27. Philip Agre, “Toward a Critical Technical Practice: Lessons Learned in Trying to Reform Ai,” in Bridging the Great Divide: Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997)
28. Owen B. Chapman and Kim Sawchuk, “Research-Creation: Intervention, Analysis and ‘Family Resemblances,’” Canadian Journal of Communication 37, no. 1 (2012)
29. Herbert J. Gans, “Public Ethnography; Ethnography as Public Sociology,” Qualitative Sociology 33, no. 1 (2010)
30. Matt Ratto, “Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life,” Information Society 27, no. 4 (2011)
31. Celia Lury and Nina Wakeford, Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social (New York: Routledge, 2012).
32. Tim Ingold, “Bringing Things to Life: Creative Entanglements in a World of Materials,” World 44 (2010).
33. Laura Watts, “The Design Mailboat,” http://www.sand14.com/?p=277
34. Kat Jungnickel, “Bikes & Bloomers. Research Website for the ESRC Funded ‘Freedom of Movement: The Bike, Bloomer and Female Cyclist and Late Nineteenth Century Britain,” http://bikesandbloomers.com
35. Jonathan Belman et al., “Grow-a- Game: A Tool for Values Conscious Design and Analysis of Digital Games” (paper presented at the Proceedings of DiGRA 2011 Conference: Think Design Play, Hilversum, The Netherlands, 2011)
36. Jackie Orr, Panic Diaries: A Genealogy of Panic Disorder (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006)
37. Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel, Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005)
38. Anthony Townsend, Laura Forlano, and Antonina Simeti, “Breakout! Escape from the Office: Situating Knowledge Work in Sentient Public Spaces,” in Sentient City, M. Shepard, ed. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011)
39. Anna Greenspan, Silvia Lindtner, and David Li, “Hacked Matter,” http://www.hackedmatter.com
40. Yanni Loukissas et al., “DigitalSTS and Design,” http://stsdesignworkshop.tumblr.com.
41. Latour and Weibel, Making Things Public; Carl DiSalvo, “Design and the Construction of Publics,” Design Issues 25, no. 1 (Winter 2009).
42. Albena Yaneva, “Making the Social Hold: Towards an Actor-Network Theory of Design,” Design and Culture 1, no. 3 (2009).
43. Laura Forlano et al., “Experiments in (and out of) the Studio: Art and Design Methods for Science and Technology Studies” (2012), https://www.academia.edu/2527061/Experiments_in_and_out_of_the_studio_Art_and_design_methods_for_Science:and_Technology_Studies_2012_; Loukissas et al., “DigitalSTS and Design.”
44. See http://www.4sonline.org/meeting/sts_making_and_doing_call_for_submissions (accessed June 26, 2015).
45. Donald A. Norman, The Design of Everyday Things (New York: Doubleday, 1990)
46. J. J. Gibson, “The Theory of Affordances,” in Perceiving, Acting and Knowing, R. Shaw and J. Bransford, eds. (New York: Wiley, 1977).
47. H. Nissenbaum, “How Computer Systems Embody Values,” Computer 34, no. 3 (2001)
48. Langdon Winner, “Do Artifacts Have Politics?,” in The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, Langdon Winner, ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986)
49. Mary Flanagan and Helen Nissenbaum, Values at Play in Digital Games (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014).
50. Donna Jeanne Haraway, “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century,” in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (New York: Routledge, 1991).
51. Bruno Latour, “Where Are the Missing Masses? A Sociology of Few Mundane Objects,” in Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, W. E. Bijker and J. Law, eds. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992).
52. Ian Bogost, Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012).
53. Latour, “Where Are the Missing Masses?,” 232.
54. Bruno Latour, We Have Never Been Modern (Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993), 13.
55. Lucy Suchman, “Feminist STS and the Sciences of the Artificial,” in New Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007), 140.
56. Lucas D. Introna, “Towards a Post-Human Intra-Actional Account of Sociomaterial Agency (and Morality),” in The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts (New York: Springer, 2014).
57. Timothy Morton, Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013).
58. DiSalvo and Lukens, “Nonathropocentrism and the Nonhuman in Design.”
59. DiSalvo and Lukens, 2.
60. Koskinen A et al., Design Research through Practice
61. Clay Spinuzzi, “The Methodology of Participatory Design,” Technical Communication 52, no. 2 (2005); Sanders and Stappers, “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.”
62. Dunne and Raby, Speculative Everything; Matt Ratto, “Open Design and Critical Making,” in Open Design Now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive, P. Atkinson, M. Avital, B. Mau, R. Ramakers, and C. Hummels, eds. (Amsterdam: BIS Publishers, 2011)
63. Julian Bleecker, “Design Fiction: A Short Essay on Design, Science, Fact and Fiction,” (2009), www.nearfuturelaboratory.com/2009/03/17/design-fiction-a-short-essay-on-design-science-fact-and-fiction/
64. Carl DiSalvo, “Spectacles and Tropes: Speculative Design and Contemporary Food Cultures,” Fibreculture Journal, no. 20 (2012)
65. Luiza Prado de O. Martins, “Privilege and Oppression: Towards a Feminist Speculative Design,” in Design Research Society (Umea, Sweden, 2014).
66. See http://www.crmnyu.org/event/1353/ (accessed July 1, 2015).
67. Lilly Irani, “Hackathons and the Making of Entrepreneurial Citizenship,” Science, Technology & Human Values (2015).
68. Fred Turner, “Prototypes,” Culture Digitally (2014).
69. David Stark and Verena Paravel, “Powerpoint in Public: Digital Technologies and the New Morphology of Demonstration,” Theory, Culture & Society 25, no. 5 (2008): 31.
70. Alan Galey and Stan Ruecker, “How a Prototype Argues,” Literary and Linguistic Computing 25, no. 4 (2010).
71. Denisa Kera, “On Prototypes: Should We Eat Mao’s Pear, Sail Saint-Exupéry’s Boat, Drink with Heidegger’s Pitcher or Use Nietzsche’s Hammer to Respond to the Crisis?,” in Pedagogies of Disaster, Vincent WJ van Gerven Oei, Nico Jenkins, and Adam Staley Groves, eds. (Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books, 2013).
72. Carl DiSalvo, Adversarial Design (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012)
73. Per-Anders Hillgren, Anna Seravalli, and Anders Emilson, “Prototyping and Infrastructuring in Design for Social Innovation,” CoDesign 7, nos. 3–4 (2011)
74. Thomas Markussen, “The Disruptive Aesthetics of Design Activism: Enacting Design between Art and Politics,” Design Issues 29, no. 1 (Winter 2013)
75. Ramia Mazé, “Forms and Politics of Design Futures,” in Ethnographies of the Possible (Aarhus, Denmark: Research Network for Design Anthropology, 2014)
76. Chantal Mouffe, “Pluralism, Dissensus and Democratic Citizenship,” II Seminário internacional educação intercultural, gênero e movimentos sociais. Identidade, diferença, mediações [II International Seminar intercultural education, gender and social movements. Identity, difference, mediations] (2003).
77. L. Forlano and M. Halpern, “Reimagining Work: Entanglements and Frictions around Future of Work Narratives,” Fibreculture, no. 25 (2015)
78. Laura Forlano and Anijo Mathew, “From Design Fiction to Design Friction: Speculative and Participatory Design of Values-Embedded Urban Technology,” Journal of Urban Technology 21, no. 4 (2014).
79. Marshall Brown, “Scenariograms: A Video Technique for Visionary Urbanism” (2014), 1.
80. Mabel Chan et al., “Meat Up,” (2014) http://www.core77designawards.com/2014/recipients/meat/ (accessed June 22, 2015); https://www.id.iit.edu/projects/critical-loop (accessed June 22, 2015).