Exploiting and defending open digital platforms with boundary resources: Android's five platform forks

Information Systems Research

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 479-497

  Karhu, Kimmo ^a   Gustafsson, Robin ^a   Lyytinen, Kalle ^b  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Boundary resources; Competitive advantage; Digital platform; Exploitation; Open platform; Platform competition; Platform forking

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION;

BOUNDARY RESOURCES; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; DIGITAL PLATFORMS; EXPLOITATION; OPEN PLATFORMS; PLATFORM FORKING;

ANDROID (OPERATING SYSTEM);

EID: 85048687968     PISSN: 10477047     EISSN: 15265536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/isre.2018.0786     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668-691
2. Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
3. Baldwin CY, Woodard CJ (2008) The architecture of platforms: A unified view. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston
4. Baldwin CY, Woodard CJ (2009) The architecture of platforms: A unified view. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK) 19-44
5. Barnett JM (2011) The host's dilemma: Strategic forfeiture in platform markets for informational goods. Harvard Law Rev. 124(8): 1863-1938
6. Barney J (1991) Firmresources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99-120
7. Bharadwaj AS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 24(1):169-196
8. Boudreau K (2010) Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Sci. 56(10): 1849-1872
9. Boudreau KJ (2011) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409-1427
10. Boudreau KJ, Jeppesen LB (2015) Unpaid crowd complementors: The platform network effect mirage. Strategic Management J. 36(12):1761-1777
11. Bryant A, Charmaz K (2007) The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory (SAGE, London)
12. Cennamo C, Santalo J (2013) Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management J. 34(11): 1331-1350
13. Dahlander L, Gann DM (2010) How open is innovation? Res. Policy 39(6):699-709
14. de Reuver M, Sørensen C, Basole RC (2017) The digital platform: A research agenda. J. Inform. Tech., https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3
15. Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660-679
16. Eaton B, Elauf-Calderwood S, Sørenson C, Yoo Y (2015) Distributed tuning of boundary resources: The case of Apple's iOS service system. MIS Quart. 39(1):217-243
17. Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van AlstyneM(2011) Platformenvelopment. Strategic Management J. 32(12):1270-1285
18. Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2006) Strategies for twosided markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(10):92-101
19. Eisenmann TR, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2008) Opening platforms: How, when and why?Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA
20. Farrell J, Saloner G (1992) Converters, compatibility, and the control of interfaces. J. Indust. Econom. 40(1):9-35
21. Fleming L, Waguespack DM (2007) Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organ. Sci. 18(2):165-180
22. Gamalielsson J, Lundell B (2014) Sustainability of open source software communities beyond a fork: How and why has the Libre-Office project evolved? J. Systems Software 89:128-145
23. Gawer A, Henderson R (2007) Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(1):1-34
24. Ghazawneh A, Henfridsson O (2013) Balancing platformcontrol and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Inform. Systems J. 23(2):173-192
25. Karhu K, Tang T, Hämäläinen M (2014) Analyzing competitive and collaborative differences among mobile ecosystems using abstracted strategy networks. Telematics Informatics 31(2): 319-333
26. Koch T, Windsperger J (2017) Seeing through the network: Competitive advantage in the digital economy. J. Organ. Design 6(1):6
27. Lavie D (2006) The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):638-658
28. Lemley MA, Reese RA (2003) Reducing digital copyright infringement without restricting innovation. Stan L. Rev. 56:1345
29. Lerner J, Tirole J (2002) Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. 50(2):197-234
30. March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71-87
31. Menell PS (2016) API copyrightability bleak house: Unraveling and repairing the Oracle v. Google jurisdictional mess. Berkeley Tech. Law J. 31(3):1515-1595
32. Nalebuff BJ, Brandenburger AM (1996) Co-Opetition (HarperCollins, London)
33. Nyman L, Lindman J (2013) Code forking, governance, and sustainability in open source software. Tech. Innovation Management Rev. 3(1):7-12
34. Nyman L, Mikkonen T, Lindman J, Fougère M (2012) Perspectives on code forking and sustainability in open source software. Hammouda I, Lundell B, Mikkonen T, Scacchi W, eds. Open Source Systems: Long-Term Sustainability, IFIP Adv. Inform. Comm. Tech., Vol. 378 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg), 274-279
35. Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2009) Six challenges in platform licensing and open innovation. Working paper, Tulane University, New Orleans
36. Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10): 1494-1504
37. Pon B, Seppälä T, Kenney M (2014) Android and the demise of operating system-based power: Firm strategy and platform control in the post-PC world. Telecomm. Policy 38(11):979-991
38. Robles G, González-Barahona JM (2012) A comprehensive study of software forks: Dates, reasons and outcomes. Hammouda I, Lundell B, Mikkonen T, Scacchi W, eds. Open Source Systems: Long-Term Sustainability, IFIPAdv. Inform. Comm. Tech., Vol. 378 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg), 1-14
39. Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platformcompetition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990-1029
40. Rumelt RP (1984) Toward a strategic theory of the firm. Lamb R, ed. Competitive Strategic Management (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 556-570
41. Schilling MA (2000) Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. 25(2):312-334
42. Schreieck M, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2016) Design and governance of platform ecosystems-key concepts and issues for future research.Working paper, Technical University of Munich, Munich
43. Simcoe T, Watson J (2016) Forking, fragmentation and splintering. Working paper, Boston University, Boston
44. Sun M, Tse E (2009) The resource-based view of competitive advantage in two-sided markets. J. Management. Stud. 46(1):45-64
45. Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C (2010) Research commentary-Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):748-759
46. Tilson D, Sørensen C, Lyytinen K (2012) Change and control paradoxes in mobile infrastructure innovation: The Android and iOS mobile operating systems cases. Proc. 45th Hawaii Internat. Conf. Systems Sci. (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA), 1324-1333
47. Tiwana A (2013) Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy (Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham, MA)
48. Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research commentary-Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675-687
49. Vesa M, Vaara E (2014) Strategic ethnography 2.0: Four methods for advancing strategy process and practice research. Strategic Organ. 12(4):288-298
50. Vetter GR (2016) Opportunistic free and open source software development pathways. Harvard J. Law Tech. 30(1):S167
51. Viseur R (2012) Forks impacts and motivations in free and open source projects. Internat. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 3(2): 117-122
52. von Krogh G, von Hippel E (2006) The promise of research on open source software. Management Sci. 52(7):975-983
53. Wade M, Hulland J (2004) Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quart. 28(1):107-142
54. Wareham J, Fox PB, Cano Giner JL (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195-1215
55. West J (2003) How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Res. Policy 32(7):1259-1285
56. West J, Bogers M (2014) Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. J. Prod. Innovation Management 31(4):814-831
57. West J, Gallagher S (2006) Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firminvestment in open-source software. RD Management 36(3):319-331
58. West J, O'Mahony S (2008) The role of participation architecture in growing sponsored open source communities. Indust. Innovation 15(2):145-168
59. Wheeler D (2015) Why open source software/free software (OSS/FS, FOSS, or FLOSS)? Look at the Numbers!, https://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html#forking
60. Williamson PJ, Meyer AD (2012) Ecosystem advantage: How to successfully harness the power of partners. California Management Rev. 55(1):24-46
61. Yin RK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
62. Yoo CS (2016) Open source, modular platforms, and the challenge of fragmentation. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
63. Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research commentary-The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724-735
64. Yoo Y, Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398-1408
65. Zhu F, Iansiti M (2012) Entry into platform-based markets. Strategic Management J. 33(1):88-106