Responsiveness of eq-5d in patients with a distal radius fracture

Hand

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2018, Pages 572-580

  Rundgren, Johanna ^a   Enocson, Anders ^a   Navarro, Cecilia Mellstrand ^a   Bergström, Gunnar ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Distal radius fracture; EQ 5D; EQ 5Dindex score; Health related quality of life (HRQoL); Patient reported outcome measure; PRWE; PRWE Swe; Responsiveness

Indexed keywords

AGED; BONE PLATE; BONE WIRE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY; EXTERNAL FIXATOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIUS FRACTURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

AGED; BONE PLATES; BONE WIRES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EXTERNAL FIXATORS; FEMALE; FRACTURE FIXATION, INTERNAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIUS FRACTURES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85048598706     PISSN: 15589447     EISSN: 15589455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1558944717725378     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Andersson B, et al. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(6):613-618.
2. Beaton DE, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C. Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(1):79-93.
3. Bradham DD. Outcomes research in orthopedics: history, perspectives, concepts, and future. Arthroscopy. 1994;10(5):493-501.
4. Brazier J, Usherwood T, Harper R, et al. Deriving a preference- based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1115-1128.
5. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37(1):53-72.
6. Brooks RG, Jendteg S, Lindgren B, et al. EuroQol: healthrelated quality of life measurement. Results of the Swedish questionnaire exercise. Health Policy. 1991;18(1):37-48.
7. Buhr AJ, Cooke AM. Fracture patterns. Lancet. 1959;1(7072): 531-536.
8. Burstrom K, Sun S, Gerdtham UG, et al. Swedish experiencebased value sets for EQ-5D health states. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(2):431-442.
9. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1): 155-159.
10. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691-697.
11. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials. 1991;12(4)(suppl): 142s-158s.
12. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997;35(11):1095-1108.
13. EuroQol Group. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199-208.
14. Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life in older people: a structured review of generic self-assessed health instruments. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(7):1651-1668.
15. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602-608.
16. Hunger M, Sabariego C, Stollenwerk B, et al. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in German stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(7):1205-1216.
17. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, et al. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(5):459-468.
18. Kimman ML, Dirksen CD, Lambin P, et al. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D in breast cancer patients in their first year after treatment. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:11.
19. Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, et al. Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ. 1998;316(7133):736-741.
20. Konig HH, Born A, Gunther O, et al. Validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with anxiety disorders. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:47.
21. MacDermid JC. Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. J Hand Ther. 1996;9(2):178-183.
22. MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Donner A, et al. Responsiveness of the short form-36, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(2):330-340.
23. MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, et al. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12(8):577-586.
24. Mellstrand Navarro C, Ahrengart L, Tornqvist H, et al. Volar locking plate or external fixation with optional addition of K-wires for dorsally displaced distal radius fractures: a randomized controlled study. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;30(4):217-224.
25. Mellstrand Navarro C, Ponzer S, Tornkvist H, et al. Measuring outcome after wrist injury: translation and validation of the Swedish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE-Swe). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:171.
26. Mellstrand-Navarro C, Pettersson HJ, Tornqvist H, et al. The operative treatment of fractures of the distal radius is increasing: results from a nationwide Swedish study. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(7):963-969.
27. Olerud P, Tidermark J, Ponzer S, et al. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D in patients with proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(8):1200-1206.
28. Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975;23(10):433-441.
29. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol group. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):337-343.
30. Tidermark J, Bergstrom G, Svensson O, et al. Responsiveness of the EuroQol (EQ 5-D) and the SF-36 in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(8):1069-1079.
31. Tordrup D, Mossman J, Kanavos P. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D to clinical change: is the patient experience adequately represented? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014;30(1):10-19.
32. Walters SJ, Brazier JE. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(6):1523-1532.
33. Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):903-912.
34. Wilcke MT, Abbaszadegan H, Adolphson PY. Evaluation of a Swedish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation outcome questionnaire: good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009;43(2):94-101