Responsiveness of the short form-36, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture

Journal of Hand Surgery

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 330-340

  MacDermid, Joy C ^a,b,c   Richards, Robert S ^a,b,c   Donner, Allan ^a,b,c   Bellamy, Nicolas ^a,b,c   Roth, James H ^a,b,c  

^a ST JOSEPH S HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Fracture; Outcome; Radius; Responsiveness

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIUS FRACTURE; SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WRIST FRACTURE;

EID: 0034063982     PISSN: 03635023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2000.jhsu25a0330     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Larsen C F, Lauritsen J. Epidemiology of acute wrist trauma. Int J Epidemiol. 22:1993;911-916.
2. McMurtry R Y, Jupiter J B. Fractures of the distal radius. Browner B D, Jupiter J B, Levine A M, Trafton P G. Skeletal trauma. 1996;1063-1093 WB Saunders, Philadelphia.
3. Sarmiento A, Zagorski J B, Sinclair W F. Functional bracing of Colles' fractures: a prospective study of immobilization in supination vs. pronation. Clin Orthop. 146:1980;175-183.
4. Ware J E Jr, Snow K S, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. 1993;The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston.
5. Hudak P L, Amadio P C, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head [sic]). Am J Ind Med. 29:1996;602-608.
6. MacDermid J C. Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. J Hand Ther. 9:1996;178-183.
7. MacDermid J C, Turgeon T, Richards R S, Beadle M, Roth J H. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma. 12:1998;577-586.
8. Fernandez J J, Gruen G S, Herndon J H. Outcome of distal radius fractures using the short form 36 health survey. Clin Orthop. 341:1997;36-41.
9. Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis. 38:1985;27-36.
10. Wright J G, Young N L. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 50:1997;239-246.
11. Norman G R, Stratford P, Regehr G. Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. J Clin Epidemiol. 50:1997;869-879.
12. Stratford P W, Binkley J M, Riddle D L. Health status measures: stategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys Ther. 76:1996;1109-1123.
13. Liang M H, Fossel A H, Larson M G. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care. 28:1990;632-642.
14. Kazis L E, Anderson J J, Meenan R F. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 27:1989;S178-S189.
15. Amadio P C, Silverstein M D, Ilstrup D M, Schleck C D, Jensen L M. Outcome after Colles fracture: the relative responsiveness of three questionnaires and physical examination measures. J Hand Surg. 21A:1996;781-787.
16. Katz J N, Gelberman R H, Wright E A, Lew R A, Liang M H. Responsiveness of self-reported and objective measures of disease severity in carpal tunnel syndrome. Med Care. 32:1994;1127-1133.
17. Ware J E Jr, Kosinski M, Keller S D. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user's manual. 1994;The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston. p. 1-10.12.
18. Arthritis Rheum. 39:1996;S112.
19. Fess E E. Grip strength. Casanova J S. Clinical assessment recommendations. 1992;41-46 American Society of Hand Therapists, Chicago.
20. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg. 9A:1984;222-226.
21. Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 66:1985;69-72.
22. LaStayo P C, Wheeler D L. Reliability of passive wrist flexion and extension goniometric measurements: a multicenter study. Phys Ther. 74:1994;162-174.
23. Norkin C C, White D J. Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry. 1995;FA Davis, Philadelphia. p. 1-149.
24. Armstrong A D, MacDermid J C, Chinchalkar S, Stevens R S, King G JW. Reliability of range-of-motion measurement in the elbow and forearm. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 7:1998;573-580.
25. Jebsen R H, Taylor N, Trieschmann R B, Trotter M J, Howard L A. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 50:1969;311-319.
26. Wright J G, Young N L. The patient-specific index: asking patients what they want. J Bone Joint Surg. 79A:1997;974-983.
27. Beaton D E, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C. Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol. 50:1997;79-93.
28. Martin D P, Engelberg R, Agel J, Swiontkowski M F. Comparison of the musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire with the short form-36, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, and the sickness impact profile health-status measures. J Bone Joint Surg. 79A:1997;1323-1335.
29. L'Insalata J C, Warren R F, Cohen S B, Altchek D W, Peterson M G. A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg. 79A:1997;738-748.
30. Hurst N P, Kind P, Ruta D, Hunter M, Stubbings A. Measuring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQol (EQ-5D). Br J Rheumatol. 36:1997;551-559.
31. Turgeon T R, MacDermid J C, Roth J H. Reliability of the NK dexterity board. J Hand Ther. 12:1999;7-15.
32. Stucki G, Liang M H, Phillips C, Katz J N. The short form-36 is preferable to the SIP as a generic health status measure in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res. 8:1995;174-181.
33. Beurskens A JHM, de Vet H CW, Köke A JA. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain. 65:1996;71-76.