On blockchain and its integration with IoT. Challenges and opportunities

Future Generation Computer Systems

Volumn 88, Issue , 2018, Pages 173-190

  Reyna, Ana ^a   Martín, Cristian ^a   Chen, Jaime ^a   Soler, Enrique ^a   Díaz, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Blockchain; Internet of Things; Smart contract; Trust

Indexed keywords

BIG DATA; BLOCKCHAIN;

DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY; DISTRIBUTED ENVIRONMENTS; INFORMATION SOURCES; INTERNET OF THING (IOT); IOT APPLICATIONS; SMART CONTRACTS; TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES; TRUST;

INTERNET OF THINGS;

EID: 85048498829     PISSN: 0167739X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2018.05.046     Document Type: Article

References (148)

1. Díaz, M., Martín, C., Rubio, B., State-of-the-art, challenges, and open issues in the integration of internet of things and cloud computing. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 67 (2016), 99–117.
2. Rivera, J., van der Meulen, R., Forecast alert: internet of things — endpoints and associated services, worldwide, 2016. Gartner, 2016.
3. World Health Organization Food safety fact sheet, 2017. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs399/en/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
4. Blockchain disruptive use cases, 2016. Available online: https://everisnext.com/2016/05/31/blockchain-disruptive-use-cases/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
5. S. Nakamoto, Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system, 2008. Available online: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
6. Antonopoulos, A.M., Mastering Bitcoin: Unlocking Digital Cryptocurrencies. 2014, O'Reilly Media, Inc.
7. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H.-N., Chen, X., Wang, H., Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey. Int. J. Web Grid Serv., 2017.
8. V. Buterin, Ethereum white paper, 2013. Available online: https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/White-Paper (Accessed 2 April 2018).
9. E. Androulaki, A. Barger, V. Bortnikov, C. Cachin, K. Christidis, A. De Caro, D. Enyeart, C. Ferris, G. Laventman, Y. Manevich, et al., Hyperledger fabric: A distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains, 2018, arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.10228.
10. J. Kennedy, $1.4bn investment in blockchain start-ups in last 9 months, says PwC expert, 2016. Available online: http://linkis.com/Ayjzj. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
11. Eyal, I., Gencer, A.E., Sirer, E.G., Van Renesse, R., Bitcoin-NG: a scalable blockchain protocol. 13th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 16), Santa Clara, CA, USA, 2016, 45–59.
12. Litecoin, 2011. https://litecoin.org/. (Accessed 4 February 2018).
13. Sompolinsky, Y., Zohar, A., Accelerating bitcoin's transaction processing. Fast Money Grows on Trees, Not Chains. IACR Cryptology EPrint Archive, vol. 881, 2013.
14. Decker, C., Wattenhofer, R., A fast and scalable payment network with bitcoin duplex micropayment channels. Symposium on Self-Stabilizing Systems, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2015, Springer, 3–18.
15. C. Stathakopoulou, C. Decker, R. Wattenhofer, A faster Bitcoin network, Tech. rep., ETH, Zurich, Semester Thesis, 2015.
16. BigchainDB: The scalable blockchain database powering IPDB, 2017. Available online: https://www.bigchaindb.com/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
17. Ipfs is the distributed web, 2017. Available online: https://ipfs.io/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
18. Li, X., Jiang, P., Chen, T., Luo, X., Wen, Q., A survey on the security of blockchain systems. Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 2017 (in press).
19. Eyal, I., Sirer, E.G., Majority is not enough: bitcoin mining is vulnerable. International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 2014, Springer, 436–454.
20. Bonneau, J., Felten, E.W., Goldfeder, S., Kroll, J.A., Narayanan, A., Why Buy when You Can Rent? Bribery Attacks on Bitcoin Consensus. 2016, Citeseer.
21. G. Karame, E. Androulaki, S. Capkun, Two bitcoins at the price of one? Double-spending attacks on fast payments in bitcoin, IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2012 (248), 2012.
22. Bitcoin average transction confirmation time, 2017. Available online: https://blockchain.info/es/charts/avg-confirmation-time. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
23. H. Finney, The Finney attack(the Bitcoin Talk forum), 2011. Available online: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3441.msg48384. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
24. Heilman, E., Kendler, A., Zohar, A., Goldberg, S., Eclipse attacks on bitcoin's peer-to-peer network. USENIX Security Symposium, Washington, D.C., USA, 2015, USENIX Association, 129–144.
25. SegWit2x backers cancel plans for bitcoin hard fork, 2017. Available online: https://techcrunch.com/2017/11/08/segwit2x-backers-cancel-plans-for-bitcoin-hard-fork/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
26. Sasson, E.B., Chiesa, A., Garman, C., Green, M., Miers, I., Tromer, E., Virza, M., Zerocash: decentralized anonymous payments from bitcoin. Security and Privacy (SP), 2014 IEEE Symposium on, San Jose, CA, USA, 2014, IEEE, 459–474.
27. Miers, I., Garman, C., Green, M., Rubin, A.D., Zerocoin: anonymous distributed e-cash from bitcoin. Security and Privacy (SP), 2013 IEEE Symposium on, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2013, IEEE, 397–411.
28. Monero, 2017. https://getmonero.org/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
29. Bitcoin Fog, 2017. Available online: http://bitcoinfog.info/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
30. Maxwell, G., CoinJoin: bitcoin privacy for the real world. Post on Bitcoin Forum, 2013 Available online: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=279249.msg2983902#msg2983902. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
31. A. Greenberg, ‘Dark Wallet’ is about to make Bitcoin money laundering easier than ever, 2014. URL http://www.wired.com/2014/04/dark-wallet.
32. Dash, 2017. https://www.dash.org/es/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
33. Bonneau, J., Narayanan, A., Miller, A., Clark, J., Kroll, J.A., Felten, E.W., Mixcoin: anonymity for bitcoin with accountable mixes. International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 2014, Springer, 486–504.
34. Ruffing, T., Moreno-Sanchez, P., Kate, A., Coinshuffle: practical decentralized coin mixing for bitcoin. European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 2014, Springer, 345–364.
35. G. Maxwell, CoinSwap: Transaction graph disjoint trustless trading, CoinSwap: Transactiongraphdisjointtrustlesstrading (October 2013), 2013.
36. Valenta, L., Rowan, B., Blindcoin: blinded, accountable mixes for bitcoin. International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 2015, Springer, 112–126.
37. Kosba, A., Miller, A., Shi, E., Wen, Z., Papamanthou, C., Hawk: the blockchain model of cryptography and privacy-preserving smart contracts. Security and Privacy (SP), 2016 IEEE Symposium on, San Jose, CA, USA, 2016, IEEE, 839–858.
38. G. Zyskind, O. Nathan, A. Pentland, Enigma: Decentralized computation platform with guaranteed privacy, 2015, arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.03471..
39. Quorum Whitepaper, 2016. Available online: https://github.com/jpmorganchase/quorum-docs/blob/master/Quorum%20Whitepaper%20v0.1.pdf. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
40. G. Greenspan, MultiChain Private BlockchainWhite Paper, 2015. Available online: https://www.multichain.com/download/MultiChain-White-Paper.pdf. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
41. S. Jehan, Rockchain A distributed data intelligence platform, 2017. https://icobazaar.com/static/4dd610d6601de7fe70eb5590b78ed7cd/RockchainWhitePaper.pdf.(Accessed 20 October 2017).
42. Lazarovich, A., Invisible Ink: Blockchain for Data Privacy. (Ph.D. thesis), 2015, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
43. Zyskind, G., Nathan, O., et al. Decentralizing privacy: using blockchain to protect personal data. Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), 2015 IEEE, San Jose, CA, USA, 2015, IEEE, 180–184.
44. D. Houlding, Healthcare Blockchain: What Goes On Chain Stays on Chain, 2017. Available online: https://itpeernetwork.intel.com/healthcare-blockchain-goes-chain-stays-chain/.(Accessed 1 February 2018).
45. Zhang, F., Cecchetti, E., Croman, K., Juels, A., Shi, E., Town crier: an authenticated data feed for smart contracts. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Vienna, Austria, 2016, ACM, 270–282.
46. Delmolino, K., Arnett, M., Kosba, A., Miller, A., Shi, E., Step by step towards creating a safe smart contract: lessons and insights from a cryptocurrency lab. International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, Christ Church, Barbados, 2016, Springer, 79–94.
47. Atzei, N., Bartoletti, M., Cimoli, T., A survey of attacks on ethereum smart contracts (sok). International Conference on Principles of Security and Trust, Uppsala, Sweden, 2017, Springer, 164–186.
48. Christidis, K., Devetsikiotis, M., Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access 4 (2016), 2292–2303.
49. Luu, L., Chu, D.-H., Olickel, H., Saxena, P., Hobor, A., Making smart contracts smarter. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Vienna, Austria, 2016, ACM, 254–269.
50. Frantz, C.K., Nowostawski, M., From institutions to code: towards automated generation of smart contracts. Foundations and Applications of Self* Systems, IEEE International Workshops on, Augsburg, Germany, 2016, IEEE, 210–215.
51. C.K. Elwell, M.M. Murphy, M.V. Seitzinger, Bitcoin: questions, answers, and analysis of legal issues, Congressional Research Service, 2013. Available online: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43339.pdf. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
52. Bitcoin is a fraud that will blow up, says JP Morgan boss, 2017. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/13/bitcoin-fraud-jp-morgan-cryptocurrency-drug-dealers. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
53. Bitcoin could be here for 100 years but it's more likely to ‘totally collapse’ Nobel laureate says, 2018. Available online: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/19/bitcoin-likely-to-totally-collapse-nobel-laureate-robert-shiller-says.html. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
54. Bitcoin could hit $100,000 in 10 years, says the analyst who correctly called its $2,000 price, 2017. Available online: https://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/31/bitcoin-price-forecast-hit-100000-in-10-years.html. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
55. E.B. Centralny, Virtual currency schemes—a further analysis, Luty, 2015. Available online: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/virtualcurrencyschemesen.pdf.(Accessed 1 February 2018).
56. BitLegal, 2017. Available online: http://bitlegal.io/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
57. Regulatory fears hammer bitcoin below $10,000, half its peak, 2017. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-global-bitcoin/regulatory-fears-hammer-bitcoin-below-10000-half-its-peak-idUSKBN1F60CG. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
58. R3, 2017. Available online: https://www.r3.com/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
59. Trusted IoT Alliance, 2017. Available online: https://www.trusted-iot.org/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
60. Alastria: National Blockchain Ecosystem, 2017. Available online: https://alastria.io/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
61. C. Cachin, M. Vukolić Blockchains Consensus Protocols in the Wild, 2017, arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01873.
62. A. Baliga, Understanding Blockchain Consensus Models, 2017. Available online: https://www.persistent.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/WP-Understanding-Blockchain-Consensus-Models.pdf.(Accessed 4 April 2018).
63. Tschorsch, F., Scheuermann, B., Bitcoin and beyond: a technical survey on decentralized digital currencies. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 18:3 (2016), 2084–2123.
64. N.T. Courtois, On the longest chain rule and programmed self-destruction of crypto currencies, 2014, arXiv preprint arXiv:1405.0534.
65. Nxt White Paper, 2014. Available online: https://bravenewcoin.com/assets/Whitepapers/NxtWhitepaper-v122-rev4.pdf. (Accessed 2018-03-04).
66. F. Schuh, D. Larimer, Bitshares 2.0: General overview, 2017. Available online: https://bravenewcoin.com/assets/Whitepapers/bitshares-general.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2018).
67. I. Stewart, Proof of burn. bitcoin. it, 2012. Available online: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Proof_of_burn. (Accessed 4 March 2018).
68. A. Nember, NEM Technical Reference, 2018. Available online: https://nem.io/wp-content/themes/nem/files/NEM_techRef.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2018).
69. Miller, A., Juels, A., Shi, E., Parno, B., Katz, J., Permacoin: repurposing bitcoin work for data preservation. Security and Privacy (SP), 2014 IEEE Symposium on, San Jose, CA, USA, 2014, IEEE, 475–490.
70. Lamport, L., et al. Paxos made simple. ACM Sigact News 32:4 (2001), 18–25.
71. Burrows, M., The chubby lock service for loosely-coupled distributed systems. Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, Seattle, WA, USA, 2006, USENIX Association, 335–350.
72. Ongaro, D., Ousterhout, J.K., In search of an understandable consensus algorithm. USENIX Annual Technical Conference, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2014, USENIX Association, 305–319.
73. Nabi-Abdolyousefi, M., Mesbahi, M., Sieve method for consensus-type network tomography. IET Control Theory Appl. 6:12 (2012), 1926–1932.
74. Ripple, 2017. https://ripple.com/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
75. Mazieres, D., The stellar consensus protocol: a federated model for internet-level consensus. Stellar Development Foundation, 2015.
76. HDAC, 2017. Available online: https://hdac.io/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
77. Gramoli, V., From blockchain consensus back to byzantine consensus. Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 2017.
78. Buzby, J.C., Roberts, T., The economics of enteric infections: human foodborne disease costs. Gastroenterology 136:6 (2009), 1851–1862.
79. H. Malviya, How Blockchain will Defend IOT, 2016. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2883711. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
80. Veena, P., Panikkar, S., Nair, S., Brody, P., Empowering the edge-practical insights on a decentralized internet of things. Empowering the Edge-Practical Insights on a Decentralized Internet of Things, vol. 17, 2015, IBM Institute for Business Value.
81. Gan, S., An IoT Simulator in NS3 and a Key-Based Authentication Architecture for IoT Devices using Blockchain. 2017, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur.
82. Chain of things, 2017. Available online: https://www.blockchainofthings.com/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
83. Filament, 2017. Available online: https://filament.com/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
84. modum, 2017. Available online: https://modum.io/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
85. G. Prisco, Slock. It to introduce smart locks linked to smart ethereum contracts, decentralize the sharing economy, 2016. Available online: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/slock-it-to-introduce-smart-locks-linked-to-smart-ethereum-contracts-decentralize-the-sharing-economy-1446746719/.(Accessed 1 February 2018).
86. Khan, M.A., Salah, K., Iot security: review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges. Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 2017.
87. LO3ENERGY, 2017. Available online: https://lo3energy.com/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
88. Aigang, 2017. Available online: https://aigang.network/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
89. My bit, 2017. Available online: https://mybit.io/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
90. Samaniego, M., Deters, R., Hosting virtual iot resources on edge-hosts with blockchain. Computer and Information Technology (CIT), 2016 IEEE International Conference on, Yanuca Island, Fiji, 2016, IEEE, 116–119.
91. Aazam, M., Huh, E.-N., Fog computing and smart gateway based communication for cloud of things. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud, FiCloud-2014, Barcelona, Spain, Aug 2014, 27–29.
92. Ethembedded, 2017. Available online: http://ethembedded.com/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
93. Raspnode, 2017. Available online: http://raspnode.com/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
94. Wüst, K., Gervais, A., Do you need a blockchain?. IACR Cryptology EPrint Archive, 2017, 2017, 375.
95. Ant Router R1-LTC The WiFi router that mines Litecoin, 2017. Available online: https://shop.bitmain.com/antrouter_r1_ltc_wireless_router_and_asic_litecoin_miner.htm. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
96. Ethraspbian, 2017. Available online: http://ethraspbian.com/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
97. Roman, R., Lopez, J., Mambo, M., Mobile edge computing, fog et al.: a survey and analysis of security threats and challenges. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 78 (2018), 680–698.
98. Roman, R., Zhou, J., Lopez, J., On the features and challenges of security and privacy in distributed internet of things. Comput. Netw. 57:10 (2013), 2266–2279.
99. Lopez, J., Rios, R., Bao, F., Wang, G., Evolving privacy: from sensors to the internet of things. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 75 (2017), 46–57.
100. Banerjee, M., Lee, J., Choo, K.-K.R., A blockchain future to internet of things security: a position paper. Digital Commun. Netw., 2017, 10.1016/j.dcan.2017.10.006 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352864817302900.
101. Ruckebusch, P., De Poorter, E., Fortuna, C., Moerman, I., Gitar: generic extension for internet-of-things architectures enabling dynamic updates of network and application modules. Ad Hoc Networks 36 (2016), 127–151.
102. Taherkordi, A., Loiret, F., Rouvoy, R., Eliassen, F., Optimizing sensor network reprogramming via in situ reconfigurable components. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN), 9(2), 2013, 14.
103. Fernandez-Gago, C., Moyano, F., Lopez, J., Modelling trust dynamics in the internet of things. Inform. Sci. 396 (2017), 72–82.
104. Liu, C., Ranjan, R., Yang, C., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Chen, J., Mur-dpa: top-down levelled multi-replica merkle hash tree based secure public auditing for dynamic big data storage on cloud. IEEE Trans. Comput. 64:9 (2015), 2609–2622.
105. Wang, C., Wang, Q., Ren, K., Lou, W., Privacy-preserving public auditing for data storage security in cloud computing. INFOCOM, 2010 Proceedings IEEE, San Diego, California, USA, 2010, Ieee, 1–9.
106. Liu, C., Yang, C., Zhang, X., Chen, J., External integrity verification for outsourced big data in cloud and iot: a big picture. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 49 (2015), 58–67.
107. Bitcoin Fog, 2016. Available online: http://www.the-blockchain.com/2016/05/01/babelchain-machine-communication-proof-understanding-new-paper/.(Accessed 1 February 2018).
108. I.A. Naidu R, Nestle, Unilever, Tyson and others team with IBM on blockchain, Reuters, 2017. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-ibm-retailers-blockchain/nestle-unilever-tyson-and-others-team-with-ibm-on-blockchain-idUSKCN1B21B1.(Accessed 20 October 2017).
109. Samaniego, M., Deters, R., Internet of smart things-iost: using blockchain and clips to make things autonomous. Cognitive Computing (ICCC), 2017 IEEE International Conference on, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2017, IEEE, 9–16.
110. The Lisk Protocol, 2017. Available online: https://docs.lisk.io/docs/the-lisk-protocol. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
111. Chronicled, 2017. Available online: https://chronicled.com/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
112. S. King, S. Nadal, Peercoin–Secure & Sustainable Cryptocoin, 2012. https://peercoin.net/whitepaper. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
113. B. Markus, Dogecoin, 2013. http://dogecoin.com/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
114. Namecoin, 2014. https://namecoin.org/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
115. V. Pradeep, Renault partners with Microsoft for blockchain-based digital car maintenance book, MSPoweruser, 2017. https://mspoweruser.com/renault-partners-microsoft-blockchain-based-digital-car-maintenance-book/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
116. C, M., The end of passport gates? dubai to test ‘invisible’ airport checks using facial recognition. The Telegraph, 2017 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2017/06/13/end-passport-gates-dubai-test-invisible-airport-checks-using/.(Accessed 20 October 2017).
117. e-identity, 2017. https://e-estonia.com/solutions/e-identity/e-residency/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
118. How to get an Illinois Birth Certificate online, 2017. https://vital-records.us/order-an-illinois-birth-certificate/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
119. C. R, Indian states look to digitize land deals with blockchain, Reuters, 2017. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-india-landrights-tech/indian-states-look-to-digitize-land-deals-with-blockchain-idUSKBN1AQ1T3. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
120. Bitpay, 2017. https://bitpay.com/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
121. Abra, 2017. https://www.abra.com/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
122. Bitnation, 2017. https://bitnation.co/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
123. OneName, 2017. https://onename.com/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
124. Keybase, 2017. https://keybase.io/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
125. ShoCard, 2017. https://shocard.com/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
126. Follow my vote, 2017. Available online: https://followmyvote.com/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
127. Tierion, 2017. https://tierion.com/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
128. Proof of Existence, 2017. https://poex.io/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
129. Factom, 2017. https://www.factom.com/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
130. Everledger, 2017. https://www.everledger.io/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
131. MIT Digital Diploma Pilot Program, 2017. http://web.mit.edu/registrar/records/certs/digital.html. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
132. Provenance, 2017. https://www.provenance.org/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
133. Skuchain, 2017. http://www.skuchain.com/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
134. Robomed network, 2017. https://robomed.io/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
135. Azaria, A., Ekblaw, A., Vieira, T., Lippman, A., Medrec: using blockchain for medical data access and permission management. Open and Big Data (OBD), International Conference on, Vienna, Austria, 2016, IEEE, 25–30.
136. Synechron, 2017. https://www.synechron.com/finlabs/mortgage-lending. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
137. Ubitquity, 2017. https://www.ubitquity.io. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
138. Atlant, 2017. https://atlant.io/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
139. DaoCasino, 2017. https://dao.casino/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
140. Peerplays, 2017. https://www.peerplays.com/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
141. Wagerr, 2017. https://wagerr.com/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
142. Storj.io, 2017. https://storj.io/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
143. R. J, Sony wants to digitize education records using the blockchain, Techcrunch, 2017. https://techcrunch.com/2017/08/09/sony-education-blockchain/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
144. ujo, 2017. https://ujomusic.com/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
145. resonate, 2017. https://resonate.is/. (Accessed 20 October 2017).
146. Chain of things, 2017. Available online: https://www.chainofthings.com/. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
147. Riddle and Code, 2017. Available online: https://www.riddleandcode.com. (Accessed 1 February 2018).
148. AeroToken, 2017. Available online: https://aerotoken.com. (Accessed 1 February 2018).