Blindcoin: Blinded, accountable mixes for bitcoin

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8976, Issue , 2015, Pages 112-126

  Valenta, Luke ^a   Rowan, Brendan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTHENTICATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DENIAL-OF-SERVICE ATTACK; MAPPING; MIXING; NETWORK SECURITY; WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY;

ADDRESS MAPPINGS; BLIND SIGNATURE SCHEME; FULLY COMPATIBLE; INPUT/OUTPUT; MIXING PROTOCOL; USER ANONYMITY;

ELECTRONIC MONEY;

EID: 84950268080     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-48051-9_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Bitcoin fog. http://www. bitcoinfog. com/.
2. Bitlaundry. http://app. bitlaundry. com/.
3. Bitmixer. io. https://bitmixer. io/.
4. The current state of coin-mixing services. http://www. thebitcoinreview. com/site. php?site id=759.
5. Online anonymity is not only for trolls and political dissidents. https://www. eff. org/deeplinks/2013/10/online-anonymity-not-only-trolls-and-political-dissidents.
6. Bitcoin message service, October 2011. https://bitcointalk. org/index. php? topic=47283. 0.
7. Coinswap, October 2013. https://bitcointalk. org/index. php?topic=321228.
8. blockchain. info, October 2014. https://blockchain. info/.
9. Transaction fees, March 2014. https://en. bitcoin. it/wiki/Transaction fees.
10. Androulaki, E., Karame, G. O., Roeschlin, M., Scherer, T., Capkun, S.: Evaluating user privacy in bitcoin. In: Sadeghi, A.-R. (ed.) FC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7859, pp. 34-51. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).
11. Barber, S., Boyen, X., Shi, E., Uzun, E.: Bitter to better-how to make bitcoin a better currency. In: Keromytis, A. D. (ed.) FC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7397, pp. 399-414. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).
12. Ben-Sasson, E., Chiesa, A., Garman, C., Green, M., Miers, I., Tromer, E., Virza, M.: Zerocash: decentralized anonymous payments from bitcoin. In: 2014 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). IEEE (2014).
13. Bonneau, J., Narayanan, A., Miller, A., Clark, J., Kroll, J. A., Felten, E. W.: Mixcoin: anonymity for bitcoin with accountable mixes. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2014: 77 (2014).
14. Chaum, D.: Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In: Chaum, D., Rivest, R. L., Sherman, A. T. (eds.) Advances in Cryptology, pp. 199-203. Springer, Heidelberg (1983).
15. Chaum, D. L.: Untraceable electronic mail, return addresses, and digital pseudonyms. Commun. ACM 24(2), 84-90 (1981).
16. Clark, J., Hengartner, U.: On the use of financial data as a random beacon. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2010: 361 (2010).
17. Dingledine, R., Mathewson, N.: Anonymity loves company: usability and the network effect. In: WEIS (2006).
18. Dingledine, R., Mathewson, N., Syverson, P.: Tor: The second-generation onion router. Technical report, DTIC Document (2004).
19. Douceur, J. R.: The sybil attack. In: Druschel, P., Kaashoek, M. F., Rowstron, A. (eds.) IPTPS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2429, pp. 251-260. Springer, Heidelberg (2002).
20. Doyle, T., Veranas, J.: Public anonymity and the connected world. Ethics Inf. Technol. 16(3), 207-218 (2014).
21. Fischlin, M.: Round-optimal composable blind signatures in the common reference string model. In: Dwork, C. (ed.) CRYPTO 2006. LNCS, vol. 4117, pp. 60-77. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).
22. Fleder, M., Kester, M. S., Pillai, S.: Bitcoin transaction graph analysis (2014). http://people. csail. mit. edu/spillai/data/papers/bitcoin-transaction-graph-analy sis. pdf.
23. Fuchsbauer, G.: Automorphic signatures in bilinear groups and an application to round-optimal blind signatures. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2009: 320 (2009).
24. Maxwell, G.: Coinjoin: Bitcoin privacy for the real world, August 2013. https://bitcointalk. org/index. php?topic=279249.
25. Miers, I., Garman, C., Green, M., Rubin, A. D.: Zerocoin: anonymous distributed e-cash from bitcoin. In: 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 397-411. IEEE (2013).
26. Möser, M., Bohme, R., Breuker, D.: An inquiry into money laundering tools in the bitcoin ecosystem. In: eCrime Researchers Summit (eCRS), pp. 1-14. IEEE (2013).
27. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Consulted 1(2012), 28 (2008).
28. Ober, M., Katzenbeisser, S., Hamacher, K.: Structure and anonymity of the bitcoin transaction graph. Future Internet 5(2), 237-250 (2013).
29. Palme, J., Berglund, M.: Anonymity on the internet. Accessed 15 August 2009 (2002).
30. Reid, F., Harrigan, M.: An analysis of anonymity in the bitcoin system. In: Altshuler, Y., Elovici, Y., Cremers, A. B., Aharony, N., Pentland, A. (eds.) Security and Privacy in Social Networks. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).
31. Ron, D., Shamir, A.: Quantitative analysis of the full bitcoin transaction graph. In: Sadeghi, A.-R. (ed.) FC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7859, pp. 6-24. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).
32. Ruffing, T., Moreno-Sanchez, P., Kate, A.: Practical decentralized coin mixing for bitcoin. HotPETS, Coinshuffle, July 2014.
33. Sweeney, L.: k-anonymity: a model for protecting privacy. Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst. 10(05), 557-570 (2002).
34. Yang, E. Z.: Secure multiparty bitcoin anonymization, July 2013. http://blog. ezyang. com/2012/07/secure-multiparty-bitcoin-anonymization/.