메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

Avoidable waste of research related to outcome planning and reporting in clinical trials

Author keywords

Core outcome set; Outcome; Randomized controlled trial; Selective reporting; Waste of research

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSENSUS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; META ANALYSIS; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CONTROLLED STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESEARCH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRENDS;

EID: 85048313202     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17417015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1083-x     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (42)

References (51)
  • 1
    • 0027420097 scopus 로고
    • OMERACT conference on outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials: introduction
    • Tugwell P, Boers M. OMERACT conference on outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials: introduction. J Rheumatol. 1993;20(3):528-30.
    • (1993) J Rheumatol , vol.20 , Issue.3 , pp. 528-530
    • Tugwell, P.1    Boers, M.2
  • 2
    • 84908147334 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patient-centered outcomes research I: the PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research
    • Frank L, Basch E, Selby JV. Patient-centered outcomes research I: the PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. Jama. 2014;312(15):1513-4.
    • (2014) Jama , vol.312 , Issue.15 , pp. 1513-1514
    • Frank, L.1    Basch, E.2    Selby, J.V.3
  • 3
    • 84921745352 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A core set of trial outcomes for every medical discipline?
    • Koroshetz W. A core set of trial outcomes for every medical discipline? BMJ. 2015;350:h85.
    • (2015) BMJ , vol.350
    • Koroshetz, W.1
  • 4
    • 84856271856 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Driving up the quality and relevance of research through the use of agreed core outcomes
    • Williamson P, Altman D, Blazeby J, Clarke M, Gargon E. Driving up the quality and relevance of research through the use of agreed core outcomes. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012;17(1):1-2.
    • (2012) J Health Serv Res Policy , vol.17 , Issue.1 , pp. 1-2
    • Williamson, P.1    Altman, D.2    Blazeby, J.3    Clarke, M.4    Gargon, E.5
  • 7
    • 63849105841 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]
    • Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from http://handbook.cochrane.org.
    • (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration
    • Higgins, J.P.T.1    Green, S.2
  • 8
    • 84978105459 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why most clinical research is not useful
    • Ioannidis JPA. Why most clinical research is not useful. PLoS Med. 2016;13(6):e1002049.
    • (2016) PLoS Med , vol.13 , Issue.6
    • Ioannidis, J.P.A.1
  • 9
    • 67649649676 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
    • Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374(9683):86-9.
    • (2009) Lancet , vol.374 , Issue.9683 , pp. 86-89
    • Chalmers, I.1    Glasziou, P.2
  • 18
    • 84923609324 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Survey of new 2007 and 2011 Cochrane reviews found 37% of prespecified outcomes not reported
    • Smith V, Clarke M, Williamson P, Gargon E. Survey of new 2007 and 2011 Cochrane reviews found 37% of prespecified outcomes not reported. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;68(3):237-45.
    • (2014) J Clin Epidemiol. , vol.68 , Issue.3 , pp. 237-245
    • Smith, V.1    Clarke, M.2    Williamson, P.3    Gargon, E.4
  • 20
    • 78349261942 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Outcome selection and role of patient reported outcomes in contemporary cardiovascular trials: systematic review
    • Rahimi K, Malhotra A, Banning AP, Jenkinson C. Outcome selection and role of patient reported outcomes in contemporary cardiovascular trials: systematic review. BMJ. 2010;341:c5707.
    • (2010) BMJ , vol.341
    • Rahimi, K.1    Malhotra, A.2    Banning, A.P.3    Jenkinson, C.4
  • 21
    • 84876802600 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Surrogate outcomes in clinical trials: a cautionary tale
    • Svensson S, Menkes DB, Lexchin J. Surrogate outcomes in clinical trials: a cautionary tale. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(8):611-2.
    • (2013) JAMA Intern Med , vol.173 , Issue.8 , pp. 611-612
    • Svensson, S.1    Menkes, D.B.2    Lexchin, J.3
  • 22
    • 84908261004 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How good is "evidence" from clinical studies of drug effects and why might such evidence fail in the prediction of the clinical utility of drugs?
    • Naci H, Ioannidis JP. How good is "evidence" from clinical studies of drug effects and why might such evidence fail in the prediction of the clinical utility of drugs? Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;55:169-89.
    • (2015) Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol , vol.55 , pp. 169-189
    • Naci, H.1    Ioannidis, J.P.2
  • 23
    • 78651320045 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • When are "positive" clinical trials in oncology truly positive?
    • Ocana A, Tannock IF. When are "positive" clinical trials in oncology truly positive? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;103(1):16-20.
    • (2010) J Natl Cancer Inst , vol.103 , Issue.1 , pp. 16-20
    • Ocana, A.1    Tannock, I.F.2
  • 24
    • 0031029801 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Would you trust a surrogate respondent?
    • Gluud C, Krogsgaard K. Would you trust a surrogate respondent? Lancet. 1997;349(9053):665-6.
    • (1997) Lancet , vol.349 , Issue.9053 , pp. 665-666
    • Gluud, C.1    Krogsgaard, K.2
  • 25
    • 0024321898 scopus 로고
    • Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction
    • The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) Investigators. Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(6):406-12.
    • (1989) N Engl J Med , vol.321 , Issue.6 , pp. 406-412
  • 26
    • 84874839883 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of treatment effect sizes associated with surrogate and final patient relevant outcomes in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study
    • Ciani O, Buyse M, Garside R, Pavey T, Stein K, Sterne JA, Taylor RS. Comparison of treatment effect sizes associated with surrogate and final patient relevant outcomes in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2013;346:f457.
    • (2013) BMJ , vol.346
    • Ciani, O.1    Buyse, M.2    Garside, R.3    Pavey, T.4    Stein, K.5    Sterne, J.A.6    Taylor, R.S.7
  • 27
    • 84859003632 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Surrogates under scrutiny: fallible correlations, fatal consequences
    • Moynihan R. Surrogates under scrutiny: fallible correlations, fatal consequences. BMJ. 2011;343:d5160.
    • (2011) BMJ , vol.343
    • Moynihan, R.1
  • 28
    • 84864286590 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Treatment effects on patient-important outcomes can be small, even with large effects on surrogate markers
    • Walter SD, Sun X, Heels-Ansdell D, Guyatt G. Treatment effects on patient-important outcomes can be small, even with large effects on surrogate markers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(9):940-5.
    • (2012) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.65 , Issue.9 , pp. 940-945
    • Walter, S.D.1    Sun, X.2    Heels-Ansdell, D.3    Guyatt, G.4
  • 29
    • 2442692780 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles
    • Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA. 2004;291(20):2457-65.
    • (2004) JAMA , vol.291 , Issue.20 , pp. 2457-2465
    • Chan, A.W.1    Hrobjartsson, A.2    Haahr, M.T.3    Gotzsche, P.C.4    Altman, D.G.5
  • 31
    • 69849092717 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials
    • Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Ravaud P. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2009;302(9):977-84.
    • (2009) JAMA , vol.302 , Issue.9 , pp. 977-984
    • Mathieu, S.1    Boutron, I.2    Moher, D.3    Altman, D.G.4    Ravaud, P.5
  • 32
    • 19144368541 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta-analysis
    • Williamson PR, Gamble C. Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2005;24(10):1547-61.
    • (2005) Stat Med , vol.24 , Issue.10 , pp. 1547-1561
    • Williamson, P.R.1    Gamble, C.2
  • 33
    • 77949680683 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews
    • Kirkham JJ, Dwan KM, Altman DG, Gamble C, Dodd S, Smyth R, Williamson PR. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews. BMJ. 2010;340:c365.
    • (2010) BMJ , vol.340
    • Kirkham, J.J.1    Dwan, K.M.2    Altman, D.G.3    Gamble, C.4    Dodd, S.5    Smyth, R.6    Williamson, P.R.7
  • 34
    • 84960384323 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review
    • Jones CW, Keil LG, Holland WC, Caughey MC, Platts-Mills TF. Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2015;13:282.
    • (2015) BMC Med , vol.13 , pp. 282
    • Jones, C.W.1    Keil, L.G.2    Holland, W.C.3    Caughey, M.C.4    Platts-Mills, T.F.5
  • 35
    • 4844223081 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
    • Chan AW, Krleza-Jeric K, Schmid I, Altman DG. Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CMAJ. 2004;171(7):735-40.
    • (2004) CMAJ , vol.171 , Issue.7 , pp. 735-740
    • Chan, A.W.1    Krleza-Jeric, K.2    Schmid, I.3    Altman, D.G.4
  • 36
    • 17144387322 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors
    • Chan A-W, Altman DG. Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors. BMJ. 2005;330(7494):753.
    • (2005) BMJ , vol.330 , Issue.7494 , pp. 753
    • Chan, A.-W.1    Altman, D.G.2
  • 37
    • 85007413463 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study
    • Dechartres A, Ravaud P, Atal I, Riveros C, Boutron I. Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study. BMC Med. 2016;14(1):100.
    • (2016) BMC Med , vol.14 , Issue.1 , pp. 100
    • Dechartres, A.1    Ravaud, P.2    Atal, I.3    Riveros, C.4    Boutron, I.5
  • 39
    • 85013413870 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions frequently consider patient-important outcomes
    • J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;84:70-77
    • Ameur H, Ravaud P, Fayard F, Riveros C, Dechartres A. Systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions frequently consider patient-important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;84:70-77.
    • Ameur, H.1    Ravaud, P.2    Fayard, F.3    Riveros, C.4    Dechartres, A.5
  • 40
    • 33846862242 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Association between unreported outcomes and effect size estimates in Cochrane meta-analyses
    • Furukawa TA, Watanabe N, Omori IM, Montori VM, Guyatt GH. Association between unreported outcomes and effect size estimates in Cochrane meta-analyses. JAMA. 2007;297(5):468-70.
    • (2007) JAMA , vol.297 , Issue.5 , pp. 468-470
    • Furukawa, T.A.1    Watanabe, N.2    Omori, I.M.3    Montori, V.M.4    Guyatt, G.H.5
  • 41
    • 84939214522 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews
    • Wuytack F, Smith V, Clarke M, Williamson P, Gargon E. Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):73.
    • (2015) Syst Rev , vol.4 , Issue.1 , pp. 73
    • Wuytack, F.1    Smith, V.2    Clarke, M.3    Williamson, P.4    Gargon, E.5
  • 42
    • 85048323516 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative
    • Accessed 11 Apr
    • The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative, http://www.comet-initiative.org/. Accessed 11 Apr 2017.
    • (2017)
  • 43
    • 84859863807 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Methodological standards and patient-centeredness in comparative effectiveness research: the PCORI perspective
    • Methodology Committee of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research I. Methodological standards and patient-centeredness in comparative effectiveness research: the PCORI perspective. JAMA. 2012;307(15):1636-40.
    • (2012) JAMA , vol.307 , Issue.15 , pp. 1636-1640
  • 44
    • 84859864850 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda
    • Selby JV, Beal AC, Frank L. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA. 2012;307(15):1583-4.
    • (2012) JAMA , vol.307 , Issue.15 , pp. 1583-1584
    • Selby, J.V.1    Beal, A.C.2    Frank, L.3
  • 45
    • 84934932863 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Core outcome sets and trial registries
    • Clarke M, Williamson P. Core outcome sets and trial registries. Trials. 2015;16(1):216.
    • (2015) Trials , vol.16 , Issue.1 , pp. 216
    • Clarke, M.1    Williamson, P.2
  • 48
  • 49
    • 84892584964 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Timing and completeness of trial results posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in journals
    • Riveros C, Dechartres A, Perrodeau E, Haneef R, Boutron I, Ravaud P. Timing and completeness of trial results posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in journals. PLoS Med. 2013;10(12):e1001566.
    • (2013) PLoS Med , vol.10 , Issue.12
    • Riveros, C.1    Dechartres, A.2    Perrodeau, E.3    Haneef, R.4    Boutron, I.5    Ravaud, P.6
  • 50
    • 55349102033 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs
    • Peters JL, Mengersen KL. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14(5):941-50.
    • (2008) J Eval Clin Pract , vol.14 , Issue.5 , pp. 941-950
    • Peters, J.L.1    Mengersen, K.L.2
  • 51
    • 84957109192 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic differences between Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses on the same topic: a matched pair analysis
    • Useem J, Brennan A, LaValley M, Vickery M, Ameli O, Reinen N, Gill CJ. Systematic differences between Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses on the same topic: a matched pair analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144980.
    • (2015) PLoS One , vol.10 , Issue.12
    • Useem, J.1    Brennan, A.2    LaValley, M.3    Vickery, M.4    Ameli, O.5    Reinen, N.6    Gill, C.J.7


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.