Core outcome sets and trial registries

Trials

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Clarke, Mike ^a   Williamson, Paula ^b  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REGISTRATION; SOCIAL CARE; STANDARDIZATION; STUDY DESIGN; WELLBEING; BIOASSAY; METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REGISTER; STANDARDS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; REGISTRIES; RESEARCH DESIGN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84934932863     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0738-6     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ghersi D, Pang T. From Mexico to Mali: four years in the history of clinical trial registration. J Evid Based Med. 2009;2:1-7.
2. Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gülmezoglu AM, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014;383:156-65.
3. Clarke M, Brice A, Chalmers I. Accumulating research: a systematic account of how cumulative meta-analyses would have provided knowledge, improved health, reduced harm and saved resources. PLoS One. 2014;9:e102670.
4. Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Clarke M, Julious S, et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet. 2014;383:267-76.
5. Davey J, Turner RM, Clarke MJ, Higgins JP. Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:160.
6. Smith V, Clarke M, Williamson P, Gargon E. Survey of new 2007 and 2011 Cochrane reviews found 37% of prespecified outcomes not reported. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:237-45.
7. Adams CE, Polzmacher S, Wolff A. Systematic reviews: what needs to be done and not to be done. J Evid Based Med. 2013;6:232-5.
8. Dwan K, Altman DG, Cresswell L, Blundell M, Gamble CL, Williamson PR. Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;1:MR000031.
9. Dwan K, Altman DG, Clarke M, Gamble C, Higgins JP, Sterne JA, et al. Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials. PLoS Med. 2014;11:e1001666.
10. National Institute for Health Research. Programme grants for applied research: Multimorbidities themed calls. 2015.
11. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer. 1981;47:207-14.
12. Kirkham JJ, Boers M, Tugwell P, Clarke M, Williamson PR. Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years. Trials. 2013;14:324.
13. Gargon E, Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M. The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013. Trials. 2014;15:279.
14. Gargon E, Gurung B, Medley N, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, et al. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99111.
15. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E, et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials. 2012;13:132.
16. Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M, Horey D, O'Boyle C. Evaluating maternity care: a core set of outcome measures. Birth. 2007;34:164-72.
17. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin J, et al. SPIRIT 2013 Explanation and Elaboration: Guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586.