Using technologies in nursing research education

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2018, Pages 293-304

  Luo, Shuhong ^a   Yang, Harrison Hao ^b,c  

^a SUNY UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT OSWEGO   (United States)

^c CENTRAL CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Mixed methods research design; Nursing research; Technologies

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JOINT; LEARNING; NURSING RESEARCH; NURSING STUDENT; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; ADULT; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FEMALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING INFORMATICS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; EDUCATION, DISTANCE; EDUCATION, NURSING; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING INFORMATICS; NURSING RESEARCH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STUDENTS, NURSING; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85048226699     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: 15389774     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000420     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Care Quality Commission Annual report and accounts 2015/16. Care Quality Commission. http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20160721- annualreport-2015-16.pdf. Published 2016. Accessed February 6, 2018.
2. Westwood G, Fader M, Roberts L, Green S, Prieto J, Bayliss-Pratt L. How clinical academics are transforming patient care. Heath Service Journal online. https://www.hsj.co.uk/home/innovation-and-efficiency/ how-clinical-academics-are-transforming-patient-care/5062463. article#.VZ-b3cZVhBc. Published 2013. Accessed February 6, 2018.
3. Committee on the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing, at the Institute of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Institute of Medicine (U.S.), eds. The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
4. Hakkarainen P, Saarelainen T, Ruokamo H. Towards meaningful learning through digital video supported, case based teaching. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2007;23(1): 87-109.
5. Killam L, Carter L, Graham R. Facebook and issues of professionalism in undergraduate nursing education: Risky business or risk worth taking. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education. 2013;27(2). http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/849. Accessed February 6, 2018.
6. Lau AS. Hospital-based nurses' perceptions of the adoption of Web 2.0 tools for knowledge sharing, learning, social interaction and the production of collective intelligence. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2011;13(4): E92.
7. Lemley T, BurnhamJF.Web 2.0 tools in medical and nursing school curricula. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2009, 97 (1) 50-52.
8. Lewis A, Moore C, Nang C. Using video of student-client interactions to engage students in reflection and peer review. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. 2015;12(4).
9. Boud D, Keogh R, Walker D. Reflection: Turning Experience Into Learning. London: Kogan Page; 1985.
10. Cornell RM, Johnson CB, Schwartz WC. Enhancing student experiential learning with structured interviews. Journal of Education for Business. 2013;88(3): 136-146.
11. Gosen J, Washbush J. A review of scholarship on assessing experiential learning effectiveness. Simulation & Gaming. 2004;35(2): 270-293.
12. Keskitalo T, Pyykkö E, Ruokamo H. Exploring the meaningful learning of students in second life. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2011;14(1): 16-26.
13. McCarthy PR, McCarthy HM. When case studies are not enough: Integrating experiential learning into business curricula. Journal of Education for Business. 2006;81: 201-204.
14. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. CA: Sage: Thousand Oaks; 2011.
15. Luo S. Mixed Methods Research Design. Android device; 2016. https://play. google.com/store/apps/details?id=io.appery.project209519. Accessed February 6, 2018.
16. Stake R. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995.
17. Kirkpatrick JD, Kirkpatrick WK. Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation. Alexandria, VA: ATD Press; 2016.
18. Wang Z, Bergin C, Bergin DA. Measuring engagement in fourth to twelfth grade classrooms: The Classroom Engagement Inventory. School Psychology Quarterly. 2014;29(4): 517-535.
19. Jensen JL, Rodgers R. Cumulating the intellectual gold of case study research. Public Administration Review. 2001;61(2): 235-246.
20. Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications; 2013.