Hospital-based nurses' perceptions of the adoption of Web 2.0 tools for knowledge sharing, learning, social interaction and the production of collective intelligence

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Lau, Adela S M ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

E learning Collective Intelligence; Human behavioral adoption; Web 2.0 tools

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; FEMALE; HONG KONG; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; KNOWLEDGE BASE; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE; NURSING EDUCATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL NETWORK;

ADULT; EDUCATION, NURSING; FEMALE; HONG KONG; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; KNOWLEDGE BASES; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL NETWORKING; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 81855206667     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1398     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Santoro E. [Podcasts, wikis and blogs: the Web 2.0 tools for medical and health education]. Recenti Prog Med 2007 Oct;98(10):484-494. [Medline: 17970173] (Pubitemid 350246627)
2. Gooding J. Web 2.0: A vehicle for transforming education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education 2008;4(2):44-53. [doi: 10.4018/jicte.2008040104]
3. Zejicek M. Web 2.0: hype or happiness? New York, NY: ACM; 2007 Presented at: 2007 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A 2007); May 7-8, 2007; Banff, Canada. [doi: 10.1145/1243441.1243453]
4. Mason R, Rennie F. Using Web 2.0 for learning in the community. The Internet and Higher Education 2007;10(3):196-203. [doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007. 06.003] (Pubitemid 47361903)
5. Ballantyne NJ, Quinn K. Front Page. San Mateo, CA: PBworks; 2006 Jun. Informal learning and the social web, part 1 URL: http://informallearning. pbworks.com/w/page/19914104/FrontPage [accessed 2011-09-22] [WebCite Cache ID 61sxGQui3]
6. Konstantinidis ST, Konstantinidis E, Nikolaidou MM, Boutou AK, Havouzis N, Argyropoulou P, et al. The use of open source and Web 2.0 in developing an integrated EHR and e-learning system for the Greek Smoking Cessation Network. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009;150:354-358. [Medline: 19745330]
7. Burrell AR, Elliott D, Hansen MM. ICT in the ICU: using Web 2.0 to enhance a community of practice for intensive care physicians. Crit Care Resusc 2009 Jun;11(2):155-159. [Medline: 19485881]
8. Lau A, Tsui E. Application of Web 2.0 technology for clinical training. In: Lytras MD, Ordóñez de Pablos P, editors. Social Web Evolution: Integrating Semantic Applications and Web 2.0 Technologies. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference; 2009:132-137 URL: http://repository.lib.polyu. edu.hk/jspui/handle/10397/1452
9. Eysenbach G. Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(3):e22 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1030] [Medline: 18725354]
10. Heilman JM, Kemmann E, Bonert M, Chatterjee A, Ragar B, Beards GM, et al. Wikipedia: a key tool for global public health promotion. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(1):e14 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1589] [Medline: 21282098]
11. Kamel Boulos MN, Wheeler S. The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Info Libr J 2007 Mar;24(1):2-23. [doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00701.x] [Medline: 17331140]
12. Boulos MN, Maramba I, Wheeler S. Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Med Educ 2006;6:41 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-41] [Medline: 16911779]
13. McGee JB, Begg M. What medical educators need to know about "Web 2.0". Medical Teacher 2008;30(2):164-169. [doi: 10.1080/01421590701881673] (Pubitemid 351942681)
14. McLean R, Richards BH, Wardman JI. The effect of Web 2.0 on the future of medical practice and education: Darwikinian evolution or folksonomic revolution? Med J Aust 2007 Aug 6;187(3):174-177 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 17680746] (Pubitemid 47307673)
15. O'Neill PA, Willis SC, Jones A. A model of how students link problem-based learning with clinical experience through "elaboration". Acad Med 2002 Jun;77(6):552-561. [Medline: 12063203] (Pubitemid 34655282)
16. Sandars J, Schroter S. Web 2.0 technologies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: an online survey. Postgrad Med J 2007 Dec;83(986):759-762. [doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2007.063123] [Medline: 18057175]
17. Connor E. Medical librarian 2.0. Med Ref Serv Q 2007;26(1):1-15. [doi: 10.1300/J115v26n01-01] [Medline: 17210545]
18. Chou WY, Hunt YM, Beckjord EB, Moser RP, Hesse BW. Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. J Med Internet Res 2009;11(4):e48 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1249] [Medline: 19945947]
19. Wicks P, Massagli M, Frost J, Brownstein C, Okun S, Vaughan T, et al. Sharing health data for better outcomes on PatientsLikeMe. J Med Internet Res 2010;12(2):e19 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1549] [Medline: 20542858]
20. Pawlak R, Brown D, Meyer MK, Connell C, Yadrick K, Johnson JT, et al. Theory of planned behavior and multivitamin supplement use in Caucasian college females. J Prim Prev 2008 Jan;29(1):57-71. [doi: 10.1007/s10935-008-0127-y] [Medline: 18386181] (Pubitemid 351548748)
21. Kim D, Chang H. Key functional characteristics in designing and operating health information websites for user satisfaction: an application of the extended technology acceptance model. Int J Med Inform 2007;76(11-12):790-800. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.001] [Medline: 17049917] (Pubitemid 47575945)
22. Shin DH, Kim WY, Kim WY. Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and flow theory to Cyworld user behavior: implication of the Web 2.0 user acceptance. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008 Jun;11(3):378-382. [doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0117] [Medline: 18537514]
23. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989;13(3):319-340. [doi: 10.2307/249008]
24. Iacovou C, Izak B, Dexter A. Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quarterly 1995 Dec;19(4):465-485. [doi: 10.2307/249629]
25. Benbasat I, Wang W. Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 2005;6(3):72-101. [doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002] [PMC: 16683729]
26. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1980.
27. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review 1974;81(1):59-74. [doi: 10.1037/h0035872]
28. Leone L, Perugini M, Ercolani AP. A comparison of three models of attitude-behaviour relationships in the studying behaviour domain. European Journal of Social Psychology 1999;29(2-3):161-189. [doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099- 0992(199903/05)29:2/33.0.CO;2-G]
29. Davis FD. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-user Information Systems: Theory and Results [dissertation]. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1986. URL: http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/ 1721.1/15192 [accessed 2011-09-24] [WebCite Cache ID 61wJnDUY2]
30. Lederer AL, Maupin DJ, Sena MP, Zhuang Y. The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems 2000;29(3):269-282 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00076-2]
31. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 1989;35(8):982-1003 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982]
32. Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research 1995;6(2):144-176 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1287/isre.6.2.144] (Pubitemid 126102974)
33. Shih Y, Fang K. The use of a decomposed theory of planned behavior to study Internet banking in Taiwan. Internet Research 2004;14(3):213-223. [doi: 10.1504/EG.2007.012177] (Pubitemid 38882667)
34. Lau A, Kwok V. How e-government strategies influence e-commerce adoption by SMEs. Electronic Government, an International Journal 2007;4(1):20-42.
35. Fink A. How To Analyze Survey Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995.
36. Dillon TW, McDowell D, Salimian F, Conklin D. Perceived ease of use and usefulness of bedside-computer systems. Comput Nurs 1998;16(3):151-156. [Medline: 9611866] (Pubitemid 128731967)
37. Leonard, Sittig DF. Improving information technology adoption and implementation through the identification of appropriate benefits: creating IMPROVE-IT. J Med Internet Res 2007;9(2):e9 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e9] [Medline: 17513287]
38. Hughes B, Joshi I, Wareham J. Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: tensions and controversies in the field. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(3):e23 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1056] [Medline: 18682374]