STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration

International Journal of STEM Education

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  English, Lyn D ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Engineering education; Mathematics education; Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary integration; STEM integration; STEM research

Indexed keywords

EID: 85048141194     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21967822     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1     Document Type: Note

References (50)

1. Barrett, B. S., Moran, A. L., & Woods, J. E. (2014). Meteorology meets engineering: an interdisciplinary STEM module for middle and early secondary school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 1, 6. doi:10.1186/2196-7822-1-6
2. Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: a preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 12(5/6), 23–37
3. Bryan, L. A., Moore, T. J., Johnson, C. C., & Roehrig, G. H. (2015). Integrated STEM education. In C. C. Johnson, E. E. Peters-Burton, & T. J. Moore (Eds.), STEM roadmap: A framework for integration (pp. 23–37). London: Taylor & Francis
4. Burke, L., Francis, K., & Shanahan, M. (2014). A horizon of possibilities: a definition of STEM education. Paper presented at the STEM 2014 Conference, Vancouver, July 12–15
5. California Department of Education. (2014). Science, technology, engineering, & mathematics (STEM) information. http://www.cde.ca.gov/PD/ca/sc/stemintrod.asp. accessed December, 2014
6. Caprile, M., Palmen, R., Sanz, & Dente, G. (2015). Encouraging STEM studies for the labour market (Directorate-General for Internal Policies: European Parliament)
7. Charette, R. N. (2013). The STEM crisis is a myth. Retrieved 23 December, 2014 from http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/education/the-stem-crisis-is-a-myth
8. Charette, R. N. (2014/2015). Commentary: STEM sense and nonsense. Educational Leadership, December 2014/January 2015, 79–83
9. Dorie, B. L., Cardella, M. E., & Svarovsky, N. (2014). Capturing the design thinking of young children interacting with a parent. Paper presented at the 121st SEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 15–18
10. English, L. D. (2015). STEM: challenges and opportunities for mathematics education. In K. Beswick, T. Muir, & J. Wells (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 3–18). Hobart, Australia: PME
11. English, L. D., & Gainsburg, J. (2016). Problem solving in a 21st-century mathematics curriculum. In L. D. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (3rd ed., pp. 313–335). New York: Taylor & Francis
12. English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2 (14). DOI: 10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7
13. English, L. D., & Kirshner, D. (2016). Changing agendas in international research in mathematics education. In L. D. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (3rd ed., pp. 3–18). New York: Taylor & Francis
14. English, L. D., & Mousoulides, N. (2015). Bridging STEM in a real-world problem. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 20(9), 532–539
15. Fitzallen, N. (2015). STEM education: what does mathematics have to offer? In M. Marshman (Eds.), Mathematics Education in the Margins. Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Sunshine Coast, June 28-July 2 (pp. 237–244). Sydney: MERGA
16. Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2010). Curriculum development for STEM integration: bridge design on the white earth reservation. In L. M. Kattington (Ed.), Handbook of Curriculum Development (pp. 347–366). Hauppauge, NY: Nova
17. Hoachlander, G. (2014/2015). Integrating SET&M. Educational Leadership, (December 2014/January 2015), 74–78
18. Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, A. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington: National Academies Press
19. Hopkins, S., Forgasz, H., Corrigan, D., & Panizzon, D. (2014). The STEM issue in Australia: what it is and where is the evidence? Paper presented at the STEM Conference. Vancouver, Canada (http://stem2014.ubc.ca)
20. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Martín, S. (2013). Technology outlook for STEM+ education 2013–2018: an NMC horizon project sector analysis. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium
21. Johnson, C. C., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Moore, T. J. (2015). STEM roadmap: a framework for integration. London: Taylor & Francis
22. Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (Eds.). (2014). Cambridge handbook of engineering education research. New York: Cambridge University Press
23. Kimmel, H. S., Burr-Alexander, L. E., Hirsch, L., Rockland, R. H., Carpinelli, J. D., & Aloia, M. (2014). Pathways to effective K-12 STEM programs. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Madrid, Spain
24. Lachapelle, C. P., & Cunningham, C. M. (2014). Engineering in elementary schools. In S. Purzer, J. Stroble, & M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in pre-college settings: Research in synthesizing research, policy, and practices (pp. 61–88). Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press
25. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000). Modeling in mathematics and science. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 101–159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
26. Lesh, R., & Lehrer, R. (2000). Iterative refinement cycles for videotape analyses of conceptual change. In R. Lesh & A. Kelly (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 665–708). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
27. Li, Y. (2014). Editorial: International Journal of STEM Education—a platform to promote STEM education and research worldwide. International Journal of STEM Education, 1:1
28. Lucas, B., Claxton, G., & Hanson, J. (2014). Thinking like an engineer: implications for the education system. Royal Academy of Engineers. www.raeng.org.uk/thinkinglikeanengineer
29. Lumley, T., & Mendelovits, J. (2012). How well do young people deal with contradictory and unreliable information on line? What the PISA digital reading assessment tells us. Vancouver: Presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association
30. Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: country comparisons. Melbourne: Australian Council of Learned Academies
31. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications
32. Moore, T. J., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Advancing the state of the art of STEM integration. Journal of STEM Education, 15(1), 5–10
33. Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In S. Purzer, J. Strobel, & M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in pre-college settings: Research into practice (pp. 35–60). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press
34. National Science and Technology Council. (2013). A report from the committee on STEM education. Washington, D.C: National Science and Technology Council
35. Next Generation Science Standards (USA, 2014). http://www.nextgenscience.org/
36. OECD (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. OECD Publishing (http://www.oecdilibrary.org/content/book/9789264190511-en)
37. Office of the Chief Scientist. (2014). Benchmarking Australian science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Canberra: Australian Government
38. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2011). Framework for 21st century learning 2-page. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework
39. Prinsley, R., & Baranyai, K. (2015). STEM skills in the workforce: what do employers want? Occasional Papers Series, issue 9, March. Office of the Chief Scientist
40. Purzer, S., Stroble, J., & Cardella, M. E. (Eds.). (2014). Engineering in pre-college settings: synthesizing research, policy, and practices. Purdue: Purdue University
41. Rennie, L., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2012). Reflecting on curriculum integration: seeking balance and connection through a worldly perspective. In L. Rennie, G. Venville, & J. Wallace (Eds.), Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Issues, reflections, and ways forward (pp. 123–142). New York: Routledge
42. Rennie, L., Wallace, J., & Venville, G. (2012). Exploring curriculum integration: why integrate? In L. Rennie, G. Venville, & J. Wallace (Eds.), Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pp. 1–11). New York: Routledge
43. Shaughnessy, M. (2013). By way of introduction: mathematics in a STEM context. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle school, 18(6), 324
44. Silk, E. M., Higashi, R., Shoop, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2010). Designing technology activities that teach mathematics. The Technology Teacher, 69(4), 21–27
45. STEM Task Force Report. (2014). Innovate: a blueprint for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in California public education. Dublin, California: Californians Dedicated to Education Foundation
46. The National Academies. (2014). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Washington: National Academy of Sciences
47. The Royal Society Science Policy Centre. (2014). Vision for science and mathematics education. London: The Royal Society
48. Thompson, S., Hillman, K., & De Bortoli, L. (2013). A teacher’s guide to PISA mathematical literacy. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research
49. Vasquez, J. (2014/2015). STEM: beyond the acronym. Educational Leadership, Dec./Jan.,10-16
50. Vasquez, J., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3–8: integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann