Bayesian hierarchical models of cognition

New Handbook of Mathematical Psychology

Volumn 1, Issue , 2016, Pages 504-551

  Rouder, Jeffrey N ^a   Morey, Richard D ^b   Pratte, Michael S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85048104300     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/9781139245913.010     Document Type: Chapter

References (100)

1. Anders, R. and Batchelder,W. H. (2012). Cultural consensus theory for multiple consensus truths. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 452-469.
2. Ashby, F. G., Maddox, W. T. and Lee, W. W. (1994). On the dangers of averaging across subjects when using multidimensional scaling or the similarity-choice model. Psychological Science, 5, 144-151.
3. Averell, L. and Heathcote, A. (2011). The form of forgetting curve and the fate of memories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55, 25-35.
4. Baayen, R. H. Tweedie, F. J. and Schreuder, R. (2002). The subjects as a simple random effect fallacy: subject variability and morphological family effects in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 81, 55-65.
5. Bamber, D. (1979). State trace analysis. A method of testing simple theories of causation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 19, 137-181.
6. Bayarri, M. J. and Garcia-Donato, G. (2007). Extending conventional priors for testing general hypotheses in linear models. Biometrika, 94, 135-152.
7. Boldini, A., Russo, R. and Avons, S. E. (2004). One-process is not enough! A speed- accuray tradeoff study of recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 353-361.
8. Busemeyer, J. R. and Diederich, A. 2009. Cognitive Modeling. Thousand Oats, CA: Sage.
9. Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: a critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
10. DeCarlo, L. M. (1998). Signal detection theory and generalized linear models. Psychological Methods, 3, 186-205.
11. Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clech, G., et al. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597-600.
12. Dickey, J.M. and Lientz, B. P. (1970). The weighted likelihood ratio, sharp hypotheses about chances, the order of a Markov chain. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 41, 214-226.
13. Doucet, A., de Freitas, N. and Gordan, N. (2001). Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice. New York, NY: Springer.
14. Edwards, W., Lindman, H. and Savage, L. J. (1963). Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychological Review, 70, 193-242.
15. Estes, W. K. (1956). The problem of inference from curves based on grouped data. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 134-140.
16. Farrell, S. and Ludwig, C. J. H. (2008). Bayesian and maximum likelihood estimation of hierarchical response time models. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 1209- 1217.
17. Finkbeiner, M. (2011). Subliminal priming with nearly perfect performance in the prime-classification task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1255- 1265.
18. Gallistel, C. R. (2009). The importance of proving the null. Psychological Review, 116, 439-453.
19. Gelfand, A. and Smith, A. F.M. (1990). Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398-409.
20. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S. and Rubin, D. B. (2004). Bayesian Data Analysis (2nd edition). London: Chapman and Hall.
21. Gelman, A., Shor, B., Bafumi, J. and Park, D. (2007). Rich state, poor state, red state, blue state: what's the matter with connecticut? Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2, 345-367.
22. Geman, S. and Geman, D. (1984). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6, 721-741.
23. Glanzer, M., Kim, K., Hilford, A. and Adams, J. K. (1999). Slope of the receiveroperating characteristic in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 500-513.
24. Green, D. M. and Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York, NY: Wiley.
25. Greenwald, A. G. (1992). New look 3: unconscious cognition reclaimed. American Psychologist, 47, 766-779.
26. Greenwald, A. G., Klinger, M. R. and Schuh, E. S. (1995). Activation by marginally perceptible ("subliminal") stimuli: dissociation of unconscious from conscious cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 22-42.
27. Haider, H. and Frensch, P. A. (2002). Why aggregated learning follows the power law of practice when individual learning does not: comment on Rickard (1997, 1999), Delaney et al. (1998), and Palmeri (1999). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 392-406.
28. Heathcote, A., Brown, S. and Mewhort, D. J. K. (2000). The power law repealed: the case for an exponential law of practice. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 185-207.
29. Hockley, W. E. (2008). The effects of environmental context on recognition memory and claims of remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1412-1429.
30. Jackman, S. (2009). Bayesian Analysis for the Social Sciences. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
31. Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of Probability (3rd edition). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32. Karabatsos, G. and Batchelder, W. H. (2003). Markov chain estimation methods for test theory without an answer key. Psychometrika, 68, 373-389.
33. Kass, R. E. and Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773-795.
34. Kellen, D., Klauer, K. and Broder, A. (2013). Recognition memory models and binaryresponse ROCs: A comparison by minimum description length. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1-27.
35. Kemp, C., Perfors, A. and Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Learning overhypotheses with hierarchical Bayesian models. Developmental Science, 10, 307-321.
36. Kintsch, W. (1967). Memory and decision aspects of recognition learning. Psychological Review, 74, 496-504.
37. Koechlin, E., Naccache, L., Block, E. and Dehaene, S. (1999). Primed numbers: exploring the modularity of numerical representations with masked and unmasked semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1882-1905.
38. Kruschke, J. K. (2011). Bayesian assessment of null values via parameter estimation and model comparison. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 299-312.
39. Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J. Neter, J. and Li, W. (2004). Applied Linear Statistical Models. Chicago, IL: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
40. Lee, M. D. (2006). A hierarchical Bayesian model of human decision-making on an optimal stopping problem. Cognitive Science, 30, 1-26.
41. Lee, M. D. and Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2013). Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science: A Practical Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Liang, F., Paulo, R., Molina, G., Clyde, M. A. and Berger, J. O. (2008). Mixtures of g-priors for Bayesian variable selection. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 410-423.
43. Lindley, D. V. (1957). A statistical paradox. Biometrika, 44, 187-192.
44. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response Times. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
45. Lunn, D. (2003). WinBUGS development interface (WBDev). IBSA Bulletin, 10.
46. Lunn, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N. and Spiegelhalter, D. (2000). WinBUGS - a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing, 10, 325-337.
47. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: the judgment of previous occurence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
48. MATLAB. (2010). Version 7.10.0 (R2010a). Natick, MA: The MathWorks Inc.
49. Meng, X. and Wong, W. H. (1996). Simulating ratios of normalizing constants via a simple identity: a theoretical exploration. Statistica Sinica, 6, 831-860.
50. Merikle, P. M., Smilek, D. and Eastwood, J. D. (2001). Perception without awareness: perspectives from cognitive psychology. Cognition, 79, 115-134.
51. Merkle, E., Smithson, M. and Verkuilen, J. (2011). Hierarchical models of simple mechanisms underlying confidence in decision making. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55, 57-67.
52. Morey, R. D. and Rouder, J. N. (2011). Bayes factor approaches for testing interval null hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 16, 406-419.
53. Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., Pratte, M. S. and Speckman, P. L. (2011). Using MCMC chain outputs to efficiently estimate Bayes factors. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55, 368-378.
54. Morey, R. D., Pratte, M. S. and Rouder, J. N. (2008a). Problematic effects of aggregation in zROC analysis and a hierarchical modeling solution. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52, 376-388.
55. Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N. and Speckman, P. L. (2008b). A statistical model for discriminating between subliminal and near-liminal performance. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52, 21-36.
56. Morey, R. D. (2008). Item Response Models for the Measurement of Thresholds. PhD thesis, University of Missouri.
57. Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N. and Speckman, P. L. (2009). A truncated-probit item response model for estimating psychophysical thresholds. Psychometrika, 74, 603-618.
58. Mulligan, N.W., Besken, M. and Peterson, D. (2010). Remember-know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modalitymatch effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 558-566.
59. Murnane, K. and Phelps, M. P. (1995). Effects of changes in relative cue strength on contextdependent recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 158-172.
60. Murphy, S. T. and Zajonc, R. B. (1993). affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 723-739.
61. Myung, I.-J. and Pitt, M. A. (1997). Applying Occam's razor in modeling cognition: a Bayesian approach. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 79-95.
62. Myung, I.-J., Kim, K. and Pitt, M. A. (2000). Toward an explanation of the power law artifact: insights from response surface analysis. Memory & Cognition, 28, 832- 840.
63. Naccache, L. and Dehaene, S. (2001). Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli. Cognition, 80, 215-229.
64. Newell, B. R. and Dunn, J. C. (2008). Dimensions in data: testing psychological models using state-trace analysis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 285-290.
65. Ntzoufras, I. (2009). Bayesian Modeling Using WinBUGS. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
66. Plummer, M. (2003). JAGS: a program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In: Proceedings of the 3rd InternationalWorkshop on Distributed Statistical Computing.
67. Pratte, M. S. and Rouder, J. N. (2009). A task-difficulty artifact in subliminal priming. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 276-283.
68. Pratte, M. S. and Rouder, J. N. (2011). Hierarchical single- and dual-process models of recognition memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55, 36-46.
69. Pratte, M. S. and Rouder, J. N. (2012). Assessing the dissociability of recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1591-1607.
70. Pratte, M. S. Rouder, J. N. and Morey, R. D. (2010). Separating mnemonic process from participant and item effects in the assessment of ROC asymmetries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 224- 232.
71. R Development Core Team. (2009). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051- 07-0.
72. Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C. F. and Grondlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99, 518-535.
73. Raudenbush, S. W. and Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74. Reder, L. M. and Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 435-451.
75. Rickard, T. C. (2004). Strategy execution in cognitive skill learning: an item-level test of candidate models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 65-82.
76. Rogers, S. (1992). How a publicity blitz created the myth of subliminal advertising. Public Relations Quarterly, 37, 12-17.
77. Rouder, J. N. and Lu, J. (2005). An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 573-604.
78. Rouder, J. N. and Morey, R. D. (2011). A Bayes factor meta-analysis of Bem's ESP claim. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 682-689.
79. Rouder, J. N. and Morey, R. D. (2012). Default Bayes factors for model selection in regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 877-903.
80. Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Cowan, N. and Pfaltz, M. (2004). Learning in a unidimensional absolute identification task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 938-944.
81. Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L. and Pratte, M. S. (2007a). Detecting chance: a solution to the null sensitivity problem in subliminal priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 597-605.
82. Rouder, J. N., Lu, J., Sun, D., et al. (2007b). Signal detection models with random participant and item effects. Psychometrika, 72, 621-642.
83. Rouder, J. N., Tuerlinckx, F., Speckman, P. L., Lu, J. and Gomez, P. (2008). A hierarchical approach for fitting curves to response time measurements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(1201-1208).
84. Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D. and Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t-tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 225-237.
85. Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L. and Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 356-374.
86. Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D. and Province, J. M. (2013). A Bayes-factor meta-analysis of recent ESP experiments: a rejoinder to Storm, Tressoldi, and Di Risio (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 139, 241-247.
87. Sarbanés Bové, D. and Held, L. (2011). Hyper-g priors for generalized linear models. Bayesian Analysis, 6, 1-24.
88. Shiffrin, R. M., Lee, M. D., Kim, W. and Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2008). A survey of model evaluation approaches with a tutorial on hierarchical Bayesian methods. Cognitive Science, 32, 1248-1284.
89. Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P. and van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Statistical Methodology), 64, 583-639.
90. Stan Development Team. (2013). Stan: A C++ Library for Probability and Sampling, Version 1.1.
91. Vandekerckhove, J., Verheyen, S. and Tuerlinckx, F. (2010). A cross random effects diffusion model for speeded semantic categorization decisions. Acta Psychologica, 133, 269-282.
92. Verdinelli, I., andWasserman, L. (1995). Computing Bayes factors using a generalization of the Savage-Dickey density ratio. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 614-618.
93. Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problem of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 779-804.
94. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Lodewyckx, T., Kuriyal, H. and Grasman, R. (2010). Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: a tutorial on the Savage-Dickey method. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 158-189.
95. Walker, S. G., Laud, P.W., Zanterdeschi, D. and Damien, P. (2011). Direct samping. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 20, 692-713.
96. Wetzels, R., Grasman, R. P. P. P. and Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2010). An encompassing prior generalization of the Savage-Dickey density ratio. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 54, 2094-2102.
97. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
98. Yonelinas, A. P. and Parks, C. M. (2007). Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 800-832.
99. Zeigenfuse, M. D. and Lee, M. D. (2010). Finding the features that represent stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 133, 283-295.
100. Zellner, A. and Siow, A. (1980). Posterior odds ratios for selected regression hypotheses. In: Bernardo, J. M., DeGroot, M. H., Lindley, D. V., and Smith, A. F. M. (eds), Bayesian Statistics: Proceedings of the First International Meeting held in Valencia (Spain). Valencia: University of Valencia, pp. 585-603.