Scientific Opinion on the use of animal-based measures to assess welfare of broilers

EFSA Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2012, Pages

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

animal based measures; Broiler welfare; on farm assessment; risk assessment; slaughterhouse inspection; welfare assessment; welfare outcome indicators

Indexed keywords

EID: 85047483993     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18314732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2774     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Algers B and Berg C, 2001. Monitoring animal welfare on commercial broiler farms in Sweden. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science Supplementum, 30, 88–92.
2. Al-Homidan; A, Robertson J and Petchey A, 2003. Review of the effect of ammonia and dust concentrations on broiler performance. World's Poultry Science Journal, 59, 340–349.
3. Allain V, Mirabito L, Arnould C, Colas M, Le Bouquin S, Lupo C and Michel V, 2009. Skin lesions in broiler chickens measured at the slaughterhouse: relationships between lesions and between their prevalence and rearing factors. British Poultry Science, 50, 407–417.
4. Arnould C and Faure JM, 2004. Use of pen space and activity of broiler chickens reared at two different densities. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 87, 155–170.
5. e Journées de la Recherche Avicole, St Malo, France, 27.
6. ® Reports No. 9, Cardiff, UK, 7–30.
7. Arnould C and Butterworth A, 2010. On-farm evaluation of broiler chicken welfare. World's Poultry Science Journal, 66, supplement. XIIIth European Poultry Conference, Tours, France, 159.
8. Aydin A, Cangar O, Ozcan SE, Bahr C and Berckmans D, 2010. Application of a fully automatic analysis tool to assess the activity of broiler chickens with different gait scores. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 73, 194–199.
9. Aziz T and Barnes HJ, 2010. Harmful effects of ammonia on birds. World Poultry, 26, 28–30.
10. Baeza E, Arnould C, Jlali M, Chartrin P, Gigaud V, Mercerand F, Durand C, Meteau K, Lebihan-Duval; E and Berri C, 2012. Influence of increasing slaughter age of chickens on meat quality, welfare and technical and economic results. Journal of Animal Science, 90, 2003–2013.
11. Berg C and Sanotra GS, 2003. Can a modified Latency-to-Lie; test be used to validate gait-scoring results in commercial broiler flocks? Animal Welfare 12, 655–659.
12. Berg C and Algers B, 2004. Using welfare outcomes to control intensification: the Swedish model. In: Measuring and auditing broiler welfare. Eds Weeks CA and Butterworth A. CABI, Wallingford, UK, 223–229.
13. Blokhuis HJ, Jones RB, Geers R, Miele M and Veissier I, 2003. Measuring and monitoring animal welfare: transparency in the food product quality chain. Animal Welfare, 12, 445–455.
14. ® project and beyond: safeguarding farm animal well-being. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science, 60, 129–140.
15. Bokkers EAM and Koene P, 2004. Motivation and ability to walk for a food reward in fast- and slow-growing broilers to 12 weeks of age. Behavioural Processes, 67, 121–130.
16. Bokkers EAM, Zimmerman PH, Rodenburg TB and Koene P, 2007. Walking behaviour of heavy and light broilers in an operant runway test with varying durations of feed deprivation and feed access. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 108, 129–142.
17. Bokkers EAM, de Boer IJM and Koene P, 2011. Space needs of broilers. Animal Welfare, 20, 623–632.
18. Buijs S, Keeling LJ, Vangestel C, Baert J, Vangeyte J and Tuyttens FAM, 2010. Resting or hiding? Why broiler chickens stay near walls and how density affects this. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 124, 97–103.
19. Buijs S, Keeling LJ, Vangestel C, Baert J and Tuyttens FAM, 2011. Neighbourhood analysis as an indicator of spatial requirements of broiler chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 129, 111–120.
20. ® Reports No. 9, Cardiff, UK, 31–37.
21. ® Reports No. 9, Cardiff, UK, 39–65.
22. Brenninkmeyer C and Winckler C, 2012. Scientific Report submitted to EFSA Relationships between animal welfare hazards and animal-based welfare indicators. External report prepared for EFSA, Wien, 21 pp. Available from: www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/doc/253e.pdf.
23. Cornetto T, Estevez I and Douglass LW, 2002. Using artificial cover to reduce aggression and disturbances in domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 75, 325–336.
24. Corr SA, Gentle MJ, McCorquodale CC and Bennett D, 2003. The effect of morphology on walking ability in the modern broiler: A gait analysis study. Animal Welfare 12, 159–171.
25. DANMAP (Danish Integrated Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Research Programme), 2010. Available from www.danmap.org.
26. Dawkins MS, Donnelly CA and Jones TA, 2004. Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature, 427, 342–344.
27. Dawkins MS, Lee HJ, Waitt CD and Roberts SJ, 2009. Optical flow patterns in broiler chicken flocks as automated measures of behaviour and gait. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 119, 203–209.
28. DEFRA (Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs). Study to assess the subjective experience, including pain, of broiler chickens with different gait scores - AW1143, online. Available from: randd.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=uenu&Module=eore&Location=none&Completed=2&ProjectID=16657.
29. De Jong IC, Gerritzen, M, Reimert, H, Fritsma, E and Pieterse, C, 2008. Automated measurement of foot pad lesions in broiler chickens. In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on the assessment of animal welfare at farm and group level. Ed Koene P. Ghent, Belgium, 32.
30. De Jong IC, Reimert HGM, Vanderhasselt R, Gerritzen MA, Gunnink H, Van Harn J, Hindle VA, Lourens A, 2011. Development of methods to monitor foot pad lesions in broiler chickens, Wageningen UR Livestock Research Report 463, Lelystad, The Netherlands. Available from edepot.wur.nl/172545.
31. De Jong I, Berg C, Butterworth A and Estevéz I, 2012. Scientific report updating the EFSA opinions on the welfare of broilers and broiler breeders. Available from: www.efsa.europa.eu/publications.
32. Dinev I and Kanakov D, 2011. Deep pectoral myopathy: prevalence in 7 weeks old broiler chickens in Bulgaria: Revue De Medecine Veterinaire, 162, 279–283.
33. DSTATIS (Statistisches Bundesamt), online. Available from www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/Wirtschaftsbereiche/LandForstwirtschaft/TierischeErzeugung/Tabellen/Gefluegelfleisch.htm.
34. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), 2010a. Scientific opinion on the influence of genetic parameters on the welfare and the resistance to stress of commercial broilers. EFSA Journal, 8(7):1666, 82 pp.
35. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), 2010b. Scientific opinion on welfare aspects of the management and housing of the grand-parent and parent stocks raised and kept for breeding purposes. EFSA Journal, 8(7):1667, 81 pp.
36. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), 2012a. Guidance on risk assessment for animal welfare. EFSA Journal, 10(1):2513, 30 pp.
37. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), 2012b. Scientific Opinion on the use of animal-based measures to assess welfare of dairy cows. EFSA Journal, 10(1):2554, 81 pp.
38. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), 2012c. Scientific Opinion on the use of animal-based measures to assess welfare in pigs. EFSA Journal, 10(1):2512, 85 pp.
39. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), 2012d. Statement on the use of animal-based measures to assess the welfare of animals. EFSA Journal, 10(6):2767, 29 pp.
40. Ekstrand C, Carpenter TE, Andersson I, and Algers B, 1998. Prevalence and control of foot-pad dermatitis in broilers in Sweden. British Poultry Science, 39, 318–324.
41. FAWC (Farm Animal Welfare Council), 2009. Farm Animal Welfare in Great Britain: Past, Present and Future. 57 pp. Available from www.fawc.org.uk/REPORTS.HTM.
42. Febrer K, Jones TA, Donnelly CA and Dawkins MS, 2006. Forced to crowd or choosing to cluster? Spatial distribution indicates social attraction in broiler chickens. Animal Behaviour 72, 1291–1300.
43. ® Reports No. 9, Cardiff, UK, 91–93.
44. ® Reports No. 9, Cardiff, UK, 176 pp.
45. Greene JA, McCracken RM and Evans RT, 1985. A contact dermatitis of broilers-clinical and pathological findings, 14, 23–38.
46. Gregory N, 1998. Animal Welfare and Meat Science. CABI, Wallingford, UK, 298 pp.
47. Gupta AR, 2011. Ascites syndrome in poultry: a review, Worlds Poultry Science Journal, 67, 457–467
48. Hall AL, 2001. The effect of stocking density on the welfare and behaviour of broiler chickens reared commercially. Animal Welfare, 10, 23–40.
49. ® Reports No. 12, Cardiff, UK, 97 pp
50. Knierim U and Gocke A, 2003. Effect of catching broilers by hand or machine on rates of injuries and dead-on-arrivals. Animal Welfare, 12, 63–73.
51. Kristensen HH, Cornou C, 2011. Automatic detection of deviations in activity levels in groups of broiler chickens - A pilot study. Biosystems Engineering, 109, 369–376.
52. Leone, EH and Estevez I, 2008a. Use of space in the domestic fowl: separating the effects of enclosure size, group size and density. Animal Behaviour, 76, 1673–1682.
53. Leone EH and Estevez I, 2008b. Space use according to the distribution of resources and level of competition, Poultry Science 87, 3–13.
54. McCune EL and Dellmann HD, 1968. Developmental Origin and Structural Characters of “Breast Blisters” in Chickens. Poultry Science, 47, 852–858.
55. McGeown D, Danbury TC, Waterman-Pearson; AE and Kestin SC, 1999. Effect of carprofen on lameness in broiler chickens. Veterinary Record, 144, 668–671.
56. McLean JA, Savory CJ and Sparks NHC, 2002. Welfare of male and female broiler chickens in relation to stocking density, as indicated by performance, health and behaviour. Animal Welfare, 11, 55–73.
57. MacRae VE, Mahon M, Gilpin S, Sandercock DA and Mitchell MA, 2006. Skeletal muscle fibre growth and growth associated myopathy in the domestic chicken (Gallus domesticus). British Poultry Science, 47, 264–272.
58. MacRae VE, Mahon M, Gilpin S, Sandercock DAHunter RR and Mitchell MA, 2007. A comparison of breast muscle characteristics in three broiler great-grandparent lines. Poultry Science, 86, 382–385.
59. Michel V, Prampart E, Mirabito L, Allain V, Arnould C, Huonnic D, Le Bouquin S and Albaric O, 2012. Histologically-validated footpad dermatitis scoring system for use in chicken processing. British Poultry Science, (in press).
60. Presi P and Reist M, 2011. Review of methodologies applicable to the validation of animal based indicators of welfare. Available from www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/pub/171e.htm.
61. Reiter K and Bessei W, 1997. Gait analysis in laying hens and broilers with and without leg disorders. Equine veterinary journal, 23, 110–112.
62. Rowe G and Wright G, 1999. The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15, 353–375.
63. Sandercock DA, Barker ZE, Mitchell MA and Hocking PM, 2009. Changes in muscle cell cation regulation and meat quality traits are associated with genetic selection for high body weight and meat yield in broiler chickens. Genetics Selection Evolution 41, 8. Available from www.gsejournal.org/content/41/1/8.
64. Savory CJ, Seawright E, and Watson A, 1992. Stereotyped behavior in broiler breeders in relation to husbandry and opiod receptor blockade. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 32, 349–360.
65. Savory CJ, Maros K and Rutter SM, 1993. Assessment of hunger in growing broiler breeders in relation to a commercial restricted feeding programme. Animal Welfare, 2, 131–152.
66. Sandilands V, Brocklehurst S, Sparks N, Baker L, McGovern R, Thorp B and Pearson D, 2011. Assessing leg health in chickens using a force plate and gait scoring: how many birds is enough? Veterinary Record, 168, 77–77.
67. SCAHAW (Scientific Committee on Animal health and Animal Welfare), 2000. The welfare of chickens kept for meat production (broilers). Report of the scientific committee in animal health and animal welfare. European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General, Brussels, Belgium, 149 pp.
68. Spindler B and Hartung J, 2011. Prevalence of pododermatitis in broiler chickens kept according to Directive 2007/43/EC stocking densities. The XVth International Congress of the International Society for Animal Hygiene, Vienna, Austria, 39–42.
69. Sprenger M, Vangestel C and Tuyttens FAM, 2009. Measuring thirst in broiler chickens. Animal Welfare 18, 553–560.
70. Stojcic MD and Bessei W, 2009. The effect of locomotor activity and weight load on bone problems in fast and slow growing chickens. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde, 73, 242–249.
71. Ventura BA, Siewerdt F and Estevez I, 2012. Access to barrier perches improves behavioural repertoire in broilers. Public Library of Science One (PLoS ONE), available online www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029826.
72. Weeks CA, Knowles TG, Gordon RG, Kerr AE, Peyton ST and Tilbrook NT, 2002. New method for objectively assessing lameness in broiler chickens. Veterinary Record, 151, 762–764.
73. ® Consortium, Lelystad, The Netherlands, 114 pp.
74. Yousuf MI, 2007. Using Experts' Opinions through Delphi Technique. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 12, 8 pp.