Forced to crowd or choosing to cluster? Spatial distribution indicates social attraction in broiler chickens

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 72, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1291-1300

  Febrer, Kian ^a   Jones, Tracey A ^a   Donnelly, Christl A ^b   Dawkins, Marian Stamp ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATION BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; POULTRY; SIMULATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; STOCKING DENSITY;

AVES; GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 33751192664     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.03.019     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Appleby M.C. What causes crowding? Effects of space, facilities and group size on behaviour, with particular reference to furnished cages for hens. Animal Welfare 13 (2004) 313-320
2. Barlow G.W. Hexagonal territories. Animal Behaviour 22 (1974) 876-878
3. Broom D.M., and Reefman N. Chicken welfare as indicated by lesions on carcasses in supermarkets. British Poultry Science 46 (2005) 407-414
4. Clark P.J., and Evans F.C. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35 (1954) 445-453
5. Couzin I.D., and Krause J. Self-organization and collective behavior in vertebrates. Advances in the Study of Behavior 32 (2003) 1-75
6. Dawkins M.S. From an animal's point of view: motivation, fitness, and animal welfare. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (1990) 1-9
7. Dawkins M.S. Behaviour as a tool in the assessment of animal welfare. Zoology 106 (2003) 383-387
8. Dawkins M.S., Donnelly C.A., and Jones T.A. Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature 427 (2004) 342-344
9. Dawson J.S., and Siegel P.B. Behavior patterns of chickens to ten weeks of age. Poultry Science 46 (1967) 615-622
10. European Commission. The welfare of chickens kept for meat production (broilers). Report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare (2000), European Commission, Brussels
11. European Commission. Proposal for a Council Directive Laying Down Minimum Standards for the Protection of Chickens Kept for Meat Production (2005), European Commission, Brussels
12. Farm Animal Welfare Council. Report on the Welfare of Broiler Chickens (1992), Farm Animal Welfare Council, Tolworth
13. Fraser D., and Matthews L.R. Preference and motivation testing. In: Appleby M.C., and Hughes B.O. (Eds). Animal Welfare (1997), CAB International, Wallingford 159-173
14. Guhl A.M., and Allee W.C. Some measurable effects of social organization in flocks of hens. Physiological Zoology 17 (1944) 32
15. Hall A. The effect of stocking density on the welfare and behaviour of broiler chickens reared commercially. Animal Welfare 10 (2001) 23-40
16. Jones T.A., Donnelly C.A., and Dawkins M.S. Environmental and management factors affecting the welfare of chickens on commercial farms stocked at five densities. Poultry Science 85 (2005) 1156-1165
17. Keeling L.J. Spacing behaviour and an ethological approach to assessing optimal space allocations for laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44 (1995) 171-186
18. Keeling L.J., and Duncan I.J.H. Social spacing in domestic fowl under semi-natural conditions. The effect of behavioural activity and activity transitions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32 (1991) 205-217
19. Krause J., and Ruxton G.D. Living in Groups (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford
20. Krebs C.J. Ecological Methodology. 2nd edn (1999), Addison Wesley Longman, Menlo Park, California
21. Kristensen E.K.M., and Wathes C.M. Ammonia and poultry: a review. World's Poultry Science Journal 56 (2000) 235-245
22. Kruijt J.P. Ontogeny of social behaviour in the Burmese red junglefowl (Gallus gallus spadiceus). Behaviour, Supplement 12 (1964) 1-201
23. Lagadic H., and Faure J.-M. Preferences of domestic hens for cage size and floor types as measured by operant conditioning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 19 (1987) 147-155
24. Lindberg A.C., and Nicol C.J. Effects of social and environmental familiarity on group preferences and spacing behaviour in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49 (1996) 109-123
25. McBride G., James J.W., and Shoffner R.N. Social forces determining spacing and head orientation in a flock of domestic hens. Nature 197 (1963) 1272-1273
26. Matthews L.R., and Ladewig J. Environmental requirements of pigs measured by behavioural demand functions. Animal Behaviour 47 (1994) 323-328
27. Mills A.D., and Faure J.-M. Social attraction and the feeding behaviour of domestic hens. Behavioural Processes 18 (1989) 71-85
28. RSPCA (Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals). The RSPCA Welfare Standards for Chickens (1995), RSPCA, Horsham
29. Simberloff D. Nearest neighbor assessments of spatial configurations of circles rather than points. Ecology 60 (1979) 679-685
30. Stricklin W.R., Graves H.B., and Wilson L.L. Some theoretical and observed relationships of fixed and portable spacing behavior of animals. Applied Animal Ethology 5 (1979) 201-214
31. Weeks C.A., Danbury B.D., Davies H.C., Hunt P., and Kestin S.C. The behaviour of broiler chickens and its modification by lameness. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67 (2000) 111-125
32. Wood-Gush D.G.M. The Behaviour of the Domestic Fowl (1971), Heinemann, London