Challenges in interdisciplinary weight management in primary care: Lessons learned from the 5As Team study

Clinical Obesity

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 124-132

  Asselin, J ^a   Osunlana, A M ^b   Ogunleye, A A ^b,c   Sharma, A M ^c   Campbell Scherer, D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Interdisciplinarity; Obesity; Primary care; Weight management

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT MANAGEMENT; CANADA; CLINICAL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIETITIAN; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY EDUCATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVENTION STUDY; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; NURSE PRACTITIONER; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT REFERRAL; PERCEPTION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGISTERED NURSE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TREATMENT DURATION;

EID: 85047103517     PISSN: 17588103     EISSN: 17588111     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cob.12133     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Shea J, Diamandis EP, Sharma AM etal. The obesity epidemic. Clin Chem 2012; 58: 968-973.
2. Tsai AG, Wadden TA. Treatment of obesity in primary care practice in the United States: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24: 1073-1079.
3. Carvajal R, Wadden TA, Tsai AG etal. Managing obesity in primary care practice: a narrative review. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2013; 1281: 191-206.
4. Wass J, Finer N. Action on obesity: comprehensive care for all. Clin Med 2013; 13: 4-5.
5. Wadden TA, Volger S, Tsai AG etal. Managing obesity in primary care practice: an overview with perspective from the POWER-UP study. Int J Obes 2013; 37: S3-S11.
6. Manns BJ, Tonelli M, Zhang J etal. Enrolment in primary care networks: impact on outcomes and processes of care for patients with diabetes. CMAJ 2012; 184: E144-E152.
7. Xyrichis A, Lowton K. What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 2008; 45: 140-153.
8. Elissen AMJ, van Raak AJA, Paulus ATG. Can we make sense of multidisciplinary co-operation in primary care by considering routines and rules? Health Soc Care Community 2011; 19: 33-42.
9. van Raak A, Mur-Veeman I, Paulus A. Understanding the feasibility of integrated care: a rival viewpoint on the influence of actions and the institutional context. Int J Health Plann Manage 1999; 14: 235-248.
10. Miller JS, Charles-Jones HD, Barry A etal. Multidisciplinary primary care mental health teams: a challenge to communication. Primary Care Mental Health 2005; 3: 171-180.
11. Campbell-Scherer DL, Asselin J, Osunlana AM etal. Implementation and evaluation of the 5As framework of obesity management in primary care: design of the 5As Team (5AsT) randomized control trial. Implement Sci 2014; 9: 78. 5908-9-78.
12. Ogunleye AA, Osunlana AM, Asselin J etal. The 5As Team intervention: bridging the knowledge gap in obesity management among primary care providers. BMC Res Notes 2015; [Accepted 1 Nov 2015.] In Press.
13. Vallis M, Piccinini-Vallis H, Sharma AM etal. Clinical Review: modified 5 As Minimal intervention for obesity counseling in primary care. Can Fam Physician 2013; 59: 27-31.
14. Lau DC, Douketis JD, Morrison KM etal. 2006 Canadian clinical practice guidelines on the management and prevention of obesity in adults and children [summary]. CMAJ 2007; 176: S1-S117.
15. Schlair S, Moore S, McMacken M etal. How to deliver high-quality obesity counseling in primary care using the 5As framework. JCOM 2012; 19: 221-229.
16. Helfrich CD, Weiner BJ, McKinney MM etal. Determinants of implementation effectiveness adapting a framework for complex innovations. Med Care Res Rev 2007; 64: 279-303.
17. Cane J, O'Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci 2012; 7: 37.
18. Tomoaia-Cotisel A, Scammon DL, Waitzman NJ etal. Context matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change. Ann Fam Med 2013; 11(Suppl. 1): S115-S123.
19. Sandelowski M, Leeman J. Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qual Health Res 2012; 22: 1404-1413.
20. Osunlana AM, Campbell-Scherer DL, Asselin J etal. 5As Team obesity intervention in primary care: development and evaluation of shared decision-making weight management tools. Clin Obes 2015; in press.
21. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications: Los Angeles, 2011.
22. Morse JM. Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals, 2nd edn. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, 1995.
23. Morse JM. Mixing qualitative methods. Qual Health Res 2009; 19: 1523-1524.
24. Sharma AM. M, M, M & M: a mnemonic for assessing obesity. Obes Rev 2010; 11: 808-809.
25. Flodgren G, Deane K, Dickinson HO etal. Interventions to change the behaviour of health professionals and the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in overweight and obese adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (3): CD000984. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000984.pub2
26. Chan BC, Perkins D, Wan Q etal. Finding common ground? Evaluating an intervention to improve teamwork among primary health-care professionals. Int J Qual Health Care 2010; 22: 519-524.
27. Vachon B, Desorcy B, Camirand M etal. Engaging primary care practitioners in quality improvement: making explicit the program theory of an interprofessional education intervention. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13: 106. 6963-13-106.
28. Rueda-Clausen C, Benterud E, Bond T etal. Effect of implementing the 5As of Obesity Management framework on provider-patient interactions in primary care. Clin Obes 2014; 4: 39-44.