Implementation and evaluation of the 5As framework of obesity management in primary care: Design of the 5As Team (5AsT) randomized control trial

Implementation Science

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Campbell Scherer, Denise L ^a   Asselin, Jodie ^a   Osunlana, Adedayo M ^a   Fielding, Sheri ^b   Anderson, Robin ^b   Rueda Clausen, Christian F ^a   Johnson, Jeffrey A ^a   Ogunleye, Ayodele A ^a   Cave, Andrew ^a   Manca, Donna ^a   Sharma, Arya M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b Edmonton Southside Primary Care Network   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evaluation studies; Family medicine; Obesity; Practice facilitation; Primary healthcare; Randomized control trial

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CANADA; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IN SERVICE TRAINING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OBESITY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

BODY MASS INDEX; CANADA; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; MALE; OBESITY; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84902762292     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-78     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Wass J, Finer N. Action on obesity: comprehensive care for all. Clin Med 2013, 13(1):4-5. 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-1-4, 23472483.
2. Wadden TA, Volger S, Tsai AG, Sarwer DB, Berkowitz RI, Diewald L, Carvajal R, Moran CH, Vetter M. Managing obesity in primary care practice: an overview with perspective from the POWER-UP study. Int J Obes 2013, 37:S3-S11.
3. Colman R, Hayward K. Cost of obesity in Alberta, summary report from Alberta health services (AHS)/research and evaluation unit. [http://www.albertahealthservices.ca/poph/hi-poph-surv-phids-cost-of-obesity-2010.pdf].
4. Cane J, O'Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci 2012, 7(1):37. 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37, 3483008, 22530986.
5. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 1999, 89(9):1322-1327. 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322, 1508772, 10474547.
6. Manns BJ, Tonelli M, Zhang J, Campbell DJ, Sargious P, Ayyalasomayajula B, Clement F, Johnson JA, Laupacis A, Lewanczuk R, McBrien K, Hemmelgarn BR. Enrolment in primary care networks: impact on outcomes and processes of care for patients with diabetes. CMAJ 2012, 184(2):E144-E152. 10.1503/cmaj.110755, 3273535, 22143232.
7. Vallis M, Piccinini-Vallis H, Sharma AM, Freedhoff Y. Clinical review: modified 5 as minimal intervention for obesity counseling in primary care. Can Fam Physician 2013, 59(1):27-31. 3555649, 23341653.
8. Lau DC, Douketis JD, Morrison KM, Hramiak IM, Sharma AM, Ur E. 2006 Canadian clinical practice guidelines on the management and prevention of obesity in adults and children [summary]. CMAJ 2007, 176(8):S1-S117.
9. Schlair S, Moore S, McMacken M, Jay M. How to deliver high-quality obesity counseling in primary care using the 5As framework. JCOM 2012, 19(5):221-229.
10. Rueda-Clausen CF, Benterud E, Bond T, Olszowka R, Vallis MT, Sharma AM. Effect of implementing the 5As of Obesity Management framework on provider-patient interactions in primary care. Clin Obes 2014, 4(1):39-44.
11. Helfrich CD, Weiner BJ, McKinney MM, Minasian L. Determinants of implementation effectiveness adapting a framework for complex innovations. Med Care Res Rev 2007, 64(3):279-303. 10.1177/1077558707299887, 17507459.
12. Campbell-Scherer D. The 11th hour time for EBM to return to first principles?. Evid Based Med 2012, 17(4):103-104. 10.1136/ebmed-2012-100578, 22736667.
13. Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Vogt TM. Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues. Health Educ Res 2006, 21(5):688-694. 10.1093/her/cyl081, 16945984.
14. Glasgow RE. RE-AIMing research for application: ways to improve evidence for family medicine. J Am Board Fam Med 2006, 19(1):11-19. 10.3122/jabfm.19.1.11, 16492000.
15. Morse JM. Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals 1995, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2.
16. Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Applied Thematic Analysis 2011, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
17. Boyatzis RE. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development 1998, London: Sage.
18. Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods 2008, 5(1):80-92.
19. Kind P. The EuroQoL Instrument: An Index of Health-Related Quality of Life. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials 1996, 191-201. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Spilker B, 2.
20. EQ-5D. [http://www.euroqol.org/about-eq-5d.html].
21. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary test of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996, 34:220-226. 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003, 8628042.
22. Glasgow R, Wagner E, Schaefer J, Mahoney L, Reid R, Greene S. Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Med Care 2005, 43(5):436-444. 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160375.47920.8c, 15838407.
23. Donner A, Klar N. Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research 2000, London: Arnold Publishers.
24. Gruen RL, Elliott JH, Nolan ML, Lawton PD, Parkhill A, McLaren CJ, Lavis JN. Sustainability science: an integrated approach for health-programme planning. Lancet 2008, 372(9649):1579-1589. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61659-1, 18984192.
25. Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, Treweek S, Furberg CD, Altman DG, Tunis S, Bergel E, Harvey I, Magid DJ, Chalkidou K. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. CMAJ 2009, 180(10):E47-E57. 10.1503/cmaj.090523, 2679824, 19372436.