Choice of outcomes and measurement instruments in randomised trials on eLearning in medical education: A systematic mapping review protocol

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Law, Gloria C ^a   Apfelbacher, Christian ^b   Posadzki, Pawel P ^a   Kemp, Sandra ^c   Tudor Car, Lorainne ^a,d  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^c CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ELearning; Measurement instruments; Measurement outcomes; Medical education; Randomised controlled trials; Validity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; SATISFACTION; SCREENING; SKILL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; MEDICAL STUDENT; PHYSICIAN; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STANDARDS; SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION; TEACHING;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; LEARNING; PHYSICIANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 85047073621     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0739-0     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Global health workforce shortage to reach 12.9 million in coming decades [ http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2013/health-workforce-shortage/en/ ].
2. Anand S, Barnighausen T. Human resources and health outcomes: cross-country econometric study. Lancet. 2004;634:1603-9.
3. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Fineberg H, Garcia P, Ke Y, Kelley P. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010;376:1923-58.
4. Al-Shorbaji N, Atun R, Car J, Majeed A, Wheeler E. eLearning for undergraduate health professional education: a systematic review informing a radical transformation of health workforce development: World Health Organization; 2015. https://whoeducationguidelines.org/content/elearning-report. Accessed 10 Aug 2017.
5. Guri-Rosenblit S. 'Distance education' and 'e-learning': not the same thing. High Educ. 2005;49:467-93.
6. Greenhalgh T. Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. BMJ. 2001;322:40.
7. Ossiannilsson E, Williams K, Camilleri AF, Brown M. Quality models in online and open education around the globe: state of the art and recommendations: ERIC; 2015.
8. George PP, Papachristou N, Belisario JM, Wang W, Wark PA, Cotic Z, Rasmussen K, Sluiter R, Riboli-Sasco E, Tudor Car L, Musulanov EM, Molina JA, Heng BH, Zhang Y, Wheeler EL, Al Shorbaji N, Majeed A, Car J. Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction. J Glob Health. 2014;4(1):010406.
9. Gruppen LD, Burkhardt JC, Fitzgerald JT, Funnell M, Haftel HM, Lypson ML, Mullan PB, Santen SA, Sheets KJ, Stalburg CM. Competency-based education: programme design and challenges to implementation. Med Educ. 2016;50:532-9.
10. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Med Educ. 2010;44:50-63.
11. Harden RM. Outcome-based education: the future is today. Med Teach. 2007;29:625-9.
12. McDonald M. Systematic assessment of learning outcomes: developing multiple-choice exams. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2002.
13. Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:387-96.
14. American Educational Research Association. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: American Educational Research Association; 2014.
15. Cook DA, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, Hatala R. Technology-enhanced simulation to assess health professionals: a systematic review of validity evidence, research methods, and reporting quality. Acad Med. 2013;88:872-83.
16. Ratanawongsa N, Thomas PA, Marinopoulos SS, Dorman T, Wilson LM, Ashar BH, Magaziner JL, Miller RG, Prokopowicz GP, Qayyum R. The reported validity and reliability of methods for evaluating continuing medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2008;83:274-83.
17. Kane MT. Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. J Educ Meas. 2013;50:1-73.
18. World Health Organization: WHO traditional medicine strategy 2002-2005. 2002.
19. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.
20. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. COSMIN checklist manual. Amsterdam: University Medical Center; 2012.