Automatic Detection of Verbal Deception

Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 1-121

  Fitzpatrick, Eileen ^a   Bachenko, Joan ^b   Fornaciari, Tommaso ^c  

^a MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Linguistech LLC   (United States)

^c Italian National Police   (Italy)

Author keywords

credibility assessment; deception detection; factual language; forensic linguistics; gold standard data; ground truth; high stakes scenarios; imaginative language; real world data; stylometry; text classification

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTATION THEORY; CRIME; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; LINGUISTICS; SPEECH; TEXT PROCESSING;

CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT; DECEPTION DETECTION; FACTUAL LANGUAGE; GOLD STANDARDS; GROUND TRUTH; HIGH-STAKES SCENARIOS; IMAGINATIVE LANGUAGE; REAL-WORLD; STYLOMETRY; TEXT CLASSIFICATION;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 85046508702     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19474040     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.2200/S00656ED1V01Y201507HLT029     Document Type: Article

References (144)

1. Adams, S. (1996). Statement analysis: What do suspects' words really reveal? FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, pages 12-20.4, 33, 36
2. Adams, S. (2002). Communication under stress: Indicators of veracity and deception in written narratives. PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.5, 33, 75, 78
3. Adams, S. and Jarvis, J. (2006). Indicators of veracity and deception: An analysis of written statements made to the police. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 13(1).33, 37, 38, 39, 41, 46, 49, 75, 78
4. Agosti, A. and Rellini, A. H. (2007). The Italian LIWC dictionary. Technical report, LIWC.net.73
5. Allen, J. J. B. and Mertens, R. (2009). Limitations to the detection of deception: True and false recollections are poorly distinguished using an event-related potential procedure. Social Neuroscience, 4(6):473-490. DOI: 10.1080/17470910802109939.11
6. Almela, A., Valencia-Garcia, R., and Cantos, P. (2012). Seeing through deception: A computational approach to deceit detection in written communication. In Proceedings of the EACL 2012 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Deception Detection, pages 15-22. Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI: 10.5195/lesli.2013.5.73, 80
7. American Polygraph Association (2010). www.polygraph.org. Accessed: April 14, 2014.9, 10
8. Bachenko, J., Fitzpatrick, E., and Schonwetter, M. (2008). Verification and implementation of language-based deception indicators in civil and criminal narratives. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics-Volume 1. CoLing, 2008.41, 46, 49, 68, 80, 86
9. Beinlich, I. A., Suermondt, H. J., Chavez, R. M., and Cooper, G. F. (1989). The ALARM Monitoring System: A Case Study with Two Probabilistic Inference Techniques for Belief Networks. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-93437-7-28.79
10. Bergström, Z. M., Anderson, M. C., Buda, M., Simons, J. S., and Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2013). Intentional retrieval suppression can conceal guilty knowledge in ERP memory detection tests. Biological Psychology, 94(1). DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.04.012.11
11. Bettadapura, V. (2009). Face expression recognition and analysis: The state of the art. Emotion, pages 1-27.87
12. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E., and Quirk, R. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, volume 2. Pearson Education Ltd.83
13. Bond, C. F. and Paulo, B. M. D. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3):214-234. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003-2.54
14. Buller, D. B. and Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6(3):203-242. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00127.x.14, 16, 17
15. Buller, D. B., Burgoon, J. K., Buslig, A., and Roiger, J. (1996). Testing interpersonal deception theory: The language of interpersonal deception. Communication Theory, 6(3):268-289. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00127.x.14, 16
16. Burgoon, J. K., Blair, J. P., Qin, T., and Nunamaker, J. (2003). Intelligence and Security Informatics, volume 2665 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, chapter Deception detection through linguistic analysis, pages 91-101. Springer.67, 81, 87
17. Burgoon, J. K., Enos, F., Fitzpatrick, E., Franklin, A., Newman, M., and Twitchell, D. (2004). Deception detection in written and spoken language. Technical report, Center for the Advanced Study of Language.57, 67
18. Burgoon, J., Mayew, W. J., Giboney, J. S., Elkins, A. C., Moffitt, K., Dorn, B., and Spitzley, L. (2015). Which Spoken Language Markers Identify Deception in High-Stakes Settings? Evidence From Earnings Conference Calls. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 0261927X15586792.47, 51
19. Chen, X., Chandramouli, R., and Koduvayur, P. S. (2014). Scam detection in Twitter. In Data Mining for Service, number 3 in Studies in Big Data, pages 133-150. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-45252-9-9.60, 66
20. Chu, W.-S., Torre, F. D. L., and Cohn, J. F. (2013). Selective transfer machine for personalized facial action unit detection. In 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 3515-3522. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2013.451.13
21. Clark, W. (2008). Written and oral statement analysis in the detection of deception. In Workshop at Third International Conference on Investigative Interviewing. Ecole Nationale de Police du Quebec, Nicolet, Quebec.37
22. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. L. Erlbaum Associates.19
23. Damphousse, K. R. (2008). Voice stress analysis: Only 15 percent of lies about drug use detected in field test. National Institute of Justice Journal, 259:8-12.10
24. Davis, M., Markus, K. A., Walters, S. B., Vorus, N., and Connors, B. (2005). Behavioral cues to deception vs. topic-incriminating potential in criminal confessions. Law and Human Behavior, 29(6):683-704. DOI: 10.1007/s10979-005-7370-z.45, 46, 49
25. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., and Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1):74-118. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74.4, 6, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 33, 64, 69, 75, 81, 85, 86
26. DePaulo, Bella M. and Robert Rosenthal and Carolyn R. Green and Judith Rosenkrantz (1982). Diagnosing deceptive and mixed messages from verbal and nonverbal cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(5):433-446. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(82)90064-6.75
27. Driscoll, L. N. (1994). A validity assessment of written statements from suspects in criminal investigations using the SCAN technique. Police Studies, 17(4).37, 38, 41, 46, 48, 49
28. Ekman, P. (1981). Mistakes when deceiving. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 364:269-278. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb34479.x.15
29. Ekman, P. (2001). Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage. W.W. Norton.13, 14, 15, 86
30. Ekman, P. (2003). Darwin, deception, and facial expression. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1000(1):205-221. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1280.010.15
31. Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry, 32(1):88-106.14
32. Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. (1974). Detecting deception from the body or face. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(3). DOI: 10.1037/h0036006.12, 13
33. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., and Simons, R. C. (1985). Is the startle reaction an emotion? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(5):1416. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.5.1416.14
34. Ekman, P. and O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46:913-920. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.9.913.54
35. Ekman, P. and O'Sullivan, M. (2006). From flawed self-Assessment to blatant whoppers: The utility of voluntary and involuntary behavior in detecting deception. Behavioural Sciences & the Law, 24:673-686. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.729.14
36. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., and Frank, M. (1999). A few can catch a liar. Psychological Science, 10(3):263-266. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00147.54
37. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., Friesen, W. V., and Scherer, K. R. (1991). Invited article: Face, voice, and body in detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15(2):125-135. DOI: 10.1007/BF00998267.14
38. Elkins, A. C., Derrick, D. C., and Gariup, M. (2012). The voice and eye gaze behavior of an imposter: Automated interviewing and detection for rapid screening at the border. In Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on Computational Approaches to Deception Detection, pages 49-54. Association for Computational Linguistics.12
39. Feng, S., Banerjee, R., and Choi, Y. (2012a). Syntactic Stylometry for Deception Detection. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 171-175, Jeju Island, Korea. Association for Computational Linguistics.4, 75, 84
40. Feng, S., Xing, L., Gogar, A., and Choi, Y. (2012b). Distributional Footprints of Deceptive Product Reviews. In Proceedings of the 2012 International AAAI Conference on WebBlogs and Social Media, volume 18, pages 98-105.76, 84
41. Feng, V. W. and Hirst, G. (2013). Detecting deceptive opinions with profile compatibility. In Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Nagoya, Japan, pages 14-18.5, 76
42. Fisher, R. P. and Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-Enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Charles C. Thomas.32
43. Fitzpatrick, E. and Bachenko, J. (2010). Building a forensic corpus to test language-based indicators of deception. In Corpus-linguistic Applications: Current Studies, New Directions, Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics, pages 183-196. Rodopi.44
44. Fitzpatrick, E. and Bachenko, J. (2012). Building a data collection for deception research. In EACL 2012 Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on Computational Approaches to Deception Detection, pages 31-38. Association for Computational Linguistics.44, 45, 57, 83, 85
45. Fleming, J. H. (1994). Multiple-Audience problems, tactical communication, and social interaction: A relational-regulation perspective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26:215. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60155-0.23
46. Fornaciari, T. and Poesio, M. (2011). Lexical vs. surface features in deceptive language analysis. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law.72, 80, 85
47. Fornaciari, T. and Poesio, M. (2013). Automatic deception detection in Italian court cases. Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 1-38. DOI: 10.1007/s10506-013-9140-4.25, 43, 45, 46, 48, 85
48. Fornaciari, T. and Poesio, M. (2014). Identifying fake Amazon reviews as learning from crowds. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 279-287. DOI: 10.3115/v1/E14-1030.54, 65, 86
49. Gokhman, S., Hancock, J. T., Prabhu, P., Ott, M., and Cardie, C. (2012). In search of a gold standard in studies of deception. In EACL 2012 Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on Computational Approaches to Deception Detection.83
50. Graciarena, M., Shriberg, E., Stolcke, A., Enos, F., Hirschberg, J., and Kajarekar, S. (2006). Combining prosodic lexical and cepstral systems for deceptive speech detection. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2006.1660200.12
51. Haddad, D., Walter, S., Ratley, R., and Smith, M. (2001). Investigation and evaluation of Voice Stress Analysis technology. Technical report, Air Force Research Laboratory, Rome, NY.10
52. Harnsberger, J. D., Hollien, H., Martin, C. A., and Hollien, K. A. (2009). Stress and deception in speech: Evaluating layered voice analysis. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 54(3):642-650. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01026.x.10
53. Hedges, L. V. and Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Academic Press.19
54. Heinrich, C. U. and Borkenau, P. (1998). Deception and deception detection: The role of crossmodal inconsistency. Journal of Personality, 66(5):687-712. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6494.00029.75
55. Hernández Fusilier, D., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Rosso, P., and Guzmán Cabrera, R. (2014). Detecting positive and negative deceptive opinions using PU-learning. Information Processing & Management. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2014.11.001.64, 66, 77
56. Hess, U. and Kleck, R. E. (1990). Differentiating emotion elicited and deliberate emotional facial expressions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20:369-385. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420200502.14
57. Hill, M. L. and Craig, K. D. (2002). Detecting deception in pain expressions: The structure of genuine and deceptive facial displays. Pain, 98:135-144. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00037-4.14
58. Hirschberg, J., Benus, S., Brenier, J. M., Enos, F., Friedman, S., Gilman, S., Girand, C., Graciarena, M., Kathol, A., and Laura Michaelis, e. a. (2005). Distinguishing deceptive from non-deceptive speech. Proceedings of Eurospeech'05.75
59. Horvath, F. (1978). An experimental comparison of the psychological stress evaluator and the galvanic skin response in detection of deception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.63.3.338.75
60. Horvath, F. (1979). Effect of different motivational instructions on detection of deception with the psychological stress evaluator and the galvanic skin response. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(3). DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.64.3.323.75
61. Horvath, F. (1982). Detecting deception: The promise and the reality of voice stress analysis. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 27(2):340-351.10
62. Horvath, F., Jayne, B., and Buckley, J. (1994). Differentiation of truthful and deceptive criminal suspects in behavior analysis interviews. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 39:793-807.43
63. Horvath, F., McCloughan, J., Weatherman, D., and Slowik, S. (2013). The accuracy of auditors' and layered voice analysis (LVA) operators' judgments of truth and deception during police questioning. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 58(2):385-392. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12066.10
64. Humpherys, S. L., Moffitt, K., Burns, M. B., Burgoon, J. K., and Felix, W. F. (2011). Identification of fraudulent financial statements using linguistic credibility analysis. Decision Support Systems, 50:585-594. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.009.47, 50
65. Inbau, F., Reid, J., Buckley, J., and Jayne, B. (2011). Criminal Interrogation and Confessions. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.28
66. Johnson, M. and Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88:67-85. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67.35, 71
67. Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., and Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(4):371-376. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.117.4.371.35
68. Kasl, S. V. and Mahl, G. F. (1965). Relationship of disturbances and hesitations in spontaneous speech to anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(5):425. DOI: 10.1037/h0021918.23
69. Keenan, J. P., Rubio, J., Racioppi, C., Johnson, A., and Barnacz, A. (2005). The right hemisphere and the dark side of consciousness. Cortex, 41:695-704. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70286-7.1
70. Keila, P. S. and Skillicorn, D. B. (2005). Detecting unusual and deceptive communication in email. In Centers for Advanced Studies Conference, pages 17-20.70
71. Köhnken, G. (2004). Statement Validity Analysis and the 'detection of the truth'. In The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts, pages 41-63. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511490071.003.34
72. Köhnken, G., Schimossek, E., Aschermann, E., and Höfer, E. (1995). The cognitive interview and the assessment of the credibility of adults' statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(6). DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.80.6.671.75, 78
73. Koper, R. J. and Sahlman, J. M. (1991). The behavioral correlates of real-world deceptive communication. In The 41st Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association.43, 47, 48, 51
74. Lafferty, J. C., Eady, P. M., and Elmers, J. (1974). The desert survival problem. Experimental Learning Methods.68
75. Larcker, D. F. and Zakolyukina, A. A. (2010). Detecting deceptive discussions in conference calls. Technical report, Rock Center for Corporate Governance/Stanford University.47, 50, 51, 72, 80
76. Li, D. and Santos, E. S. (2012). Argument formation in the reasoning process: Toward a generic model of deception detection. In Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on Computational Approaches to Deception Detection, pages 63-71. Association for Computational Linguistics.79
77. Lin, D. (1998). An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-98).83
78. Lippold, O. (1971). Physiological tremor. Scientific American, 224(3). DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0371-65.10
79. Mann, S., Vrij, A., and Bull, R. (2002). Suspects, lies and videotape: An analysis of authentic high-stake liars. Law and Human Behavior, 26(3):365-376. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015332606792.45, 49
80. Mann, S., Vrij, A., and Bull, R. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1):137. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.137.54
81. Mann, W. C. and Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: Towards a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8(3):243-281.78
82. Marcus, M. P., Santorini, B., and Marcinkiewicz, M. A. (1993). Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.53
83. Mehrabian, A. (1977). Nonverbal Communication. Aldine.23
84. Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Bhatt, S., and Brandon, S. (2012). Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions. Campbell Systematic Reviews.29
85. Mihalcea, R. and Strapparava, C. (2009). The Lie Detector: Explorations in the Automatic Recognition of Deceptive Language. Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP Conference Short Papers, pages 309-312. DOI: 10.3115/1667583.1667679.54, 60, 76, 80, 81
86. Nahari, G., Vrij, A., and Fisher, R. P. (2012). Does the truth come out in the writing? SCAN as a lie detection tool. Law and Human Behavior, 36(1):68-76. DOI: 10.1037/h0093965.37, 39, 40, 41
87. National Research Council (2003). The Polygraph and Lie Detection. Haworth Press, Washington, D.C.9, 10
88. Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., and Richards, J. M. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5):665-675. DOI: 10.1177/0146167203029005010.54, 55, 70, 80
89. Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., and Hancock, J. T. (2011). Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lingustics, pages 309-319. Association for Computational Linguistics.36, 54, 57, 58, 61, 62, 68, 71, 76, 77, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84
90. Ott, M., Cardie, C., and Hancock, J. T. (2013). Negative deceptive opinion spam. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 497-501, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.54, 63, 81, 84
91. Pavlidis, I., Eberhardt, N. I., and Levine, J. A. (2002). Seeing through the face of deception. Nature, 415:35. DOI: 10.1038/415035a.11
92. Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., and Booth, R. J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. LIWC.net, Austin, TX.4, 70
93. Pennebaker, J. W. and Francis, M. E. (1996). Cognitive, emotional, and language processes in disclosure: Physical health and adjustment. Cognition and Emotion, 10:601-626. DOI: 10.1080/026999396380079.70
94. Pennebaker, J. W., Mayne, T. J., and Francis, M. E. (1997). Linguistic predictors of adaptive bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(4):863-871. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.863.70
95. Petrov, S. and Klein, D. (2007). Improved inference for unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, volume 7, pages 404-411.75
96. Pollina, D. A., Dollins, A. B., Senter, S. M., Brown, T. E., Pavlidis, I., Levine, J. A., and Ryan, A. H. (2006). Facial skin surface temperature changes during a "concealed information" test. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 34(7):1182-1189. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-006-9143-3.11
97. Porter, S. and Yuille, J. C. (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20(4). DOI: 10.1007/BF01498980.37, 39, 40, 41, 75
98. Quinlan, J. R. (1993). C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann.67
99. Rabon, D. (1996). Investigative Discourse Analysis. Carolina Academic Press.33, 37
100. Ramirez-Esparza, N., Pennebaker, J., Garcia, F. A., and Raquel Suria-Martinez, e. a. (2007). La psicologia del uso de las palabras: Un programa de computadora que analiza textos en espanõl. Sociedad Mexicana de Psicologia.74
101. Raskin, D. C. and Esplin, P. W. (1991). Statement Validity Assessment: Interview procedures and content analysis of children's statements of sexual abuse. Behavioral Assessment.33
102. Raykar, V. C., Yu, S., Zhao, L. H., Hermosillo Valadez, G., Florin, C., Bogoni, L., and Moy, L. (2010). Learning from crowds. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11:1297-1322.66
103. Rayson, P., Wilson, A., and Leech, G. (2001). Grammatical word class variation within the British National Corpus sampler. Language and Computers, 36(1):295-306.71, 82, 83
104. Reiter, C. (2007). Travel websites clamp down on bogus reviews. online. Accessed: October 12, 2014.62
105. Resnik, P. (1995). Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.83
106. Rissman, J., Greely, H. T., and Wagner, A. D. (2010). Detecting individual memories through the neural decoding of memory states and past experience. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(21):9849-9854. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1001028107.12
107. Rubin, V. L. and Vashchilko, T. (2012). Identification of truth and deception in text: Application of vector space model to Rhetorical Structure Theory. In Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on Computational Approaches to Deception Detection, pages 97-106. Association for Computational Linguistics.4, 78
108. Rudacille, W. C. (1994). Identifying Lies in Disguise. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, IO.33
109. Sandbach, G., Zafeiriou, S., Pantic, M., and Yin, L. (2012). Static and dynamic 3D facial expression recognition: A comprehensive survey. Image and Vision Computing, 30:683-697. DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2012.06.005.87
110. Santos, E. J. and Li, D. (2010). On deception detection in multiagent systems. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on, 40(2):224-235. DOI: 10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2034862.78
111. Sapir, A. (1987). Scientific Content Analysis. Technical report, Phoenix: Laboratory for Scientific Interrogation.33
112. Saxe, L., Dougherty, D., and Cross, T. (1985). The validity of polygraph testing: Scientific analysis and public controversy. American Psychologist, 40(3):355-366. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.40.3.355.9
113. Shaw, D. J., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Hillman, J., Granhag, P. A., and Fisher, R. P. (2013). Expect the unexpected? variations in question type elicit cues to deception in joint interviewer contexts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(3):336-343. DOI: 10.1002/acp.2911.31, 32
114. Smith, N. (2001). Reading between the lines: An evaluation of the scientific content analysis technique (SCAN). Technical report, Home Office. Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.37, 39, 46, 49, 50
115. Sporer, S. L. (1997). The less travelled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11(5):373-397. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199710)11:5%3C373::AID-ACP461%3E3.3.CO;2-S.35, 75
116. Sporer, S. L. (2004). Reality monitoring and detection of deception. In Granhag, Pär Anders and Strömwall, Leif A., editor, The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts, pages 64-102. Cambridge University Press.36, 40
117. Steller, M. (1989). Recent developments in statement analysis. In Yuille, J., editor, Credibility Assessment, pages 135-154. Kluwer, Deventer, The Netherlands.36
118. Steller, M. and Köhnken, G. (1989). Criteria-based content analysis. In Raskin, D. C., editor, Psychological Methods in Criminal Investigation and Evidence, pages 217-245. Springer-Verlag.33, 34, 78
119. Streeter, L. A., Krauss, R. M., Geller, V., Olson, C., and Apple, W. (1977). Pitch changes during attempted deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(5). DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.35.5.345.12
120. Strömwall, L. A., Bengtsson, L., Leander, L., and Granhag, P. A. (2004). Assessing children's statements: The impact of a repeated experience on CBCA and RM ratings. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(6):653-668. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1021.36
121. Trankell, A. (1963). Vittnespsykologins Arbetsmetoder. Liber.33
122. Trovillo, P. V. (1939). History of lie detection. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 29(6):848-881.2
123. Undeutsch, U. (1954). Die Entwicklung der gerichtspsychologischena Gutachtertätigkeit. [The historical development of the use of expert psychological testimony]. In Wellek, A., editor, Bericht uber den 19, Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaftfür Psychologie, Gottingen. Verlag für Psychologie.3
124. Undeutsch, U. (1967). Beurteilung der Glaubhaftigkeit von Aussagen [Veracity assessment of statements]. In Undeutsch, U., editor, Handbuch der Psychologie: Vol.11. Forensische Psychologie, pages 26-181. Hogrefe, Gottingen, Germany.33
125. Undeutsch, U. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. In Yuille, J. C., editor, Credibility Assessment, pages 101-119. Springer.33, 78
126. Valla, L. (2008). On the Donation of Constantine. The I Tatti Renaissance Library (Book 24). Harvard University Press.3
127. Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-based content analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(1):3-41. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.3.35, 44
128. Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities. Wiley Series in the Psychology of Crime, Policing and Law. John Wiley & Sons, 2nd edition.3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 16, 32, 36, 37, 40, 41, 69, 86
129. Vrij, A. and Granhag, P. A. (2012). Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(2):110-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004.28, 29
130. Vrij, A. and Mann, S. (2001a). Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: The case of a convicted murderer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15:187-203. DOI: 10.1002/1099-0720(200103/04)15:2%3C187::AID-ACP696%3E3.0.CO;2-A.43, 45, 49
131. Vrij, A. and Mann, S. (2001b). Who killed my relative? Police officers' ability to detect real-life high-stake lies. Psychology, Crime and Law, 7(1-4):119-132. DOI: 10.1080/10683160108401791.54
132. Vrij, A. and Mann, S. (2004). Detecting deception: The benefit of looking at a combination of behavioral, auditory, and speech content related cues in a systematic manner. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13(1):61-79. DOI: 10.1023/B:GRUP.0000011946.74290.bc.86
133. Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., and Fisher, R. (2010). 'Look into my eyes': Can an instruction to maintain eye contact facilitate lie detection? Psychology, Crime & Law, 16(4):327-348. DOI: 10.1080/10683160902740633.11, 30, 31
134. Vrij, A., Mann, S. A., Fisher, R. P., Leal, S., Milne, R., and Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32(3):253. DOI: 10.1007/s10979-007-9103-y.29, 30
135. Warmelink, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., Forrester, D., and Fisher, R. P. (2011). Thermal imaging as a lie detector tool at airports. Law and Human Behavior, 35(1):40-48. DOI: 10.1007/s10979-010-9251-3.11
136. Wiener, M. and Mehrabian, A. (1968). Language within Language: Immediacy, a Channel in Verbal Communication. Ardent Media.23, 78
137. Wu, G., Greene, D., Smyth, B., and Cunningham, P. (2010). Distortion as a validation criterion in the identification of suspicious reviews. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics, pages 10-13. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1964858.1964860.83
138. Zaparniuk, J., Yuille, J. C., and Taylor, S. (1995). Assessing the credibility of true and false statements. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 18(3):343-352. DOI: 10.1016/0160-2527(95)00016-B.75
139. Zhou, L., Burgoon, J. K., Nunamaker, J. F., and Twitchell, D. (2004a). Automating linguistics-based cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computermediated communications. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13(1):81-106. DOI: 10.1023/B:GRUP.0000011944.62889.6f.68, 70
140. Zhou, L., Burgoon, J. K., Twitchell, D. P., Qin, T., and Nunamaker, J. F. (2004b). A comparison of classification methods for predicting deception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(4):139-166.54, 67, 68, 70, 80
141. Zuckerman, M., DeFrank, R. S., Hall, J. A., Larrance, D. T., and Rosenthal, R. (1979). Facial and vocal cues of deception and honesty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15(4):378-396. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(79)90045-3.75
142. Zuckerman, M., Paulo, B. M. D., and Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In Berkowitz, L., editor, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, volume 14, pages 1-57. Academic Press, New York.14, 15
143. Zuckerman, M., Driver, R., and Koestner, R. (1982). Discrepancy as a cue to actual and perceived deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 7(2):95-100. DOI: 10.1007/BF00986871.14, 75
144. Zuckerman, M. and Driver, R. E. (1985). Telling lies: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. Multichannel Integrations of Nonverbal Behavior, pages 129-147.14