Scam Detection in Twitter

Studies in Big Data

Volumn 3, Issue , 2014, Pages 133-150

  Chen, Xiaoling ^a   Chandramouli, Rajarathnam ^a   Subbalakshmi, Koduvayur P ^a  

^a Stevens Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Akaike Information Criterion; Bayesian Information Criterion; Latent Semantic Analysis; Suffix Tree; Unlabeled Data

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); TREES (MATHEMATICS);

AKAIKE'S INFORMATION CRITERIONS; BAYESIAN INFORMATION CRITERION; CLUSTERING ANALYSIS; LABELED DATA; LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; SELF-LEARNING; SEMI-SUPERVISED; SOCIAL NETWORKING SERVICES; SUFFIX-TREES; UNLABELED DATA;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84943162287     PISSN: 21976503     EISSN: 21976511     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-45252-9_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (13)

1. Pampapathi, R., Mirkin, B., Levene, M.: A suffix tree approach to anti-spam email filtering. Mach. Learn. 65(1), 309–338 (2006). (Kluwer Academic Publishers)
2. Twitter Spam: 3 ways scammers are filling twitter with junk. http://mashable.com/2009/06/15/twitter-scams/(2009)
3. Twitter Scam Incidents Growing: The 5 most common types of twitter scams–and 10 ways to avoid them. http://www.scambusters.org/twitterscam.html (2010)
4. Yardi, S., Romero, D., Schoenebeck, G., Boyd, D.: Detecting spam in a twitter network. First Monday, 15(1), 1–14 (2010)
5. Wang, A.H.: Don’t follow me: spam detection in twitter. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Cryptography SECRYPT, (2010)
6. Benevenuto, F., Magno, G., Rodrigues, T., Almeida, V.: Detecting spammers on twitter. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Collaboration, Electronic messaging, Anti-Abuse and Spam Conference, CEAS 2010, Redmond, Washington, US, 13–14 July (2010)
7. Lee, K., Caverlee, J., Webb, S.: Uncovering social Spammers: social honeypots + machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 33rd SIGIR’10, Geneva, Switzerland 19–23 July (2010)
8. Gayo-Avello, D., Brenes, D.J.: Overcoming spammers in twitter-a tale of five algorithms. In: Proceedings of the CERI 2010, Madrid, Espana, pp. 41–52 (2010)
9. Xu, J.M., Fumera, G., Roli, F., Zhou, Z.H.: Training SpamAssassin with active semi-supervised learning. In: The Sixth Conference on Email and Anti-Spam CEAS 2009, Mountain View, California USA, 16–17 July (2009)
10. Nigam, K., McCallum, A., Mitchell, T.M.: Semi-Supervised Text Classification Using EM. In: Chapelle, O., Zien, A., Scholkopf, B. (eds.) Semi-Supervised Learning. MIT Press, Boston (2006)
11. Zhu, X.: Semi-Supervised Learning Literature Survey, Computer Sciences Technical Report 1530. University of Wisconsin, Madison (2006)
12. Natural Language Toolkit. http://www.nltk.org/Home (2010)
13. Fraley, C., Raftery, A.E.: How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis. Comput. J. 41, 578–588 (1998)