Data sharing in PLOS ONE: An analysis of Data Availability Statements

PLoS ONE

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2018, Pages

  Federer, Lisa M ^a   Belter, Christopher W ^a   Joubert, Douglas J ^a   Livinski, Alicia ^a   Lu, Ya Ling ^a   Snyders, Lissa N ^a   Thompson, Holly ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PUBLICATION; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PUBLICATIONS;

EID: 85046459197     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194768     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Silva L. PLOS’ New Data Policy: Public Access to Data. In: EveryONE: PLOS ONE Community Blog [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2 Apr 2017]. Available: http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2014/02/24/plos-new-datapolicy-public-access-data-2/
2. Nature Publishing Group. Availability of data & materials [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2 Apr 2017]. Available: http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/availability.html
3. Science. Science: editorial policies [Internet]. 2017 [cited 31 Jul 2017]. Available: http://www.sciencemag.org/authors/science-editorial-policies
4. Elsevier. Research Data [Internet]. 2017 [cited 20 Sep 2017]. Available: https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/research-data
5. National Institutes of Health. National Institutes of Health Plan for Increasing Access to Scientific Publications and Digital Scientific Data from NIH Funded Scientific Research [Internet]. 2015 [cited 19 Jul 2017]. Available: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/NIH-Public-Access-Plan.pdf
6. National Science Foundation. Dissemination and Sharing of Research Results [Internet]. 2010. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsp
7. Holdren JP. Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research [Internet]. 2013 [cited 19 Jul 2017]. Available: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf
8. ACMG Board of Directors. Laboratory and clinical genomic data sharing is crucial to improving genetic health care: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet Med. 2017; 19: 721–722. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.196 PMID: 28055021
9. Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IjJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016; 3: 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18 PMID: 26978244
10. Tenopir C, Dalton ED, Allard S, Frame M, Pjesivac I, Birch B, et al. Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide. van den Besselaar P, editor. PLoS One. Sage; 2015; 10: e0134826. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134826 PMID: 26308551
11. Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, Aydinoglu AU, Wu L, Read E, et al. Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e21101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101PMID: 21738610
12. Federer LM, Lu Y-L, Joubert DJ, Welsh J, Brandys B. Biomedical data sharing and reuse: Attitudes and practices of clinical and scientific research staff. PLoS One. 2015; 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129506 PMID: 26107811
13. Kidwell MC, Lazarević LB, Baranski E, Hardwicke TE, Piechowski S, Falkenberg LS, et al. Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency. PLoS Biol. 2016; 14: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456 PMID: 27171007
14. Fecher B, Friesike S, Hebing M, Linek S. A reputation economy: how individual reward considerations trump systemic arguments for open access to data. Palgrave Commun. Nature Publishing Group; 2017; 3: 17051. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.51
15. Giofrè D, Cumming G, Fresc L, Boedker I, Tressoldi P. The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors’ reporting of statistics and use of open research practices. PLoS One. 2017; 12: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175583 PMID: 28414751
16. Nuijten MB, Borghuis J, Veldkamp CLS, Alvarez LD, van Assen MALM, Wicherts J. Journal Data Sharing Policies and Statistical Reporting Inconsistencies in Psychology. PsyArXiv. 2017; 3: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SGBTA
17. Wicherts JM, Borsboom D, Kats J, Molenaar D. The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. Am Psychol. 2006; 61: 726–728. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.726 PMID: 17032082
18. Vines TH, Albert AYK, Andrew RL, Débarre F, Bock DG, Franklin MT, et al. The availability of research data declines rapidly with article age. Curr Biol. Elsevier; 2014; 24: 94–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.014 PMID: 24361065
19. Savage CJ, Vickers AJ, Kats J, Molenaar D. Empirical Study of Data Sharing by Authors Publishing in PLoS Journals. Mavergames C, editor. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2009; 4: e7078. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007078 PMID: 19763261
20. PLOS. Data Availability [Internet]. 2017 [cited 31 Jul 2017]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen. 1005716
21. Byrne M. Making Progress Toward Open Data: Reflections on Data Sharing at PLOS ONE. In: EveryONE: PLOS ONE Community Blog [Internet]. 2017 [cited 6 Jul 2017]. Available: http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2017/05/08/making-progress-toward-open-data/
22. Chamberlain S, Boettiger C, Ram K. rplos: Interface to PLOS Journals search API. R package version 0.5.6 [Internet]. 2016. Available: https://github.com/ropensci/rplos
23. Gamer M, Lemon J, Fellows I, Singh P. irr: Various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement. R package version 0.84 [Internet]. 2012. Available: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/irr/index.html
24. Revelle W. psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. R package version 1.5.8 [Internet]. 2017. Available: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/
25. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem medica. Croatian Society for Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine; 2012; 22: 276–82. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 23092060
26. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159–74. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/843571 PMID: 843571
27. McDonald L, Schultze A, Simpson A, Graham S, Wasiak R, Ramagopalan S V. A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study. F1000Research. 2017; 6: 1708. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12673.2 PMID: 29167735
28. Rowhani-Farid A, Barnett AG. Has open data arrived at the British Medical Journal (BMJ)? An observational study. BMJ Open. 2016; 6: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011784 PMID: 27737882
29. Naudet F, Sakarovitch C, Janiaud P, Cristea I, Fanelli D, Moher D, et al. Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: survey of studies published in The BMJ and PLOS Medicine. Bmj. 2018; k400. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k400
30. Powell K, Doty J, Kupsco J. Author Behavior and Attitudes Toward the PLOS Data Availability Policy. Medical Library Association 2016 Annual Meeting. 2016.
31. Magee AF, May MR, Moore BR. The Dawn of Open Access to Phylogenetic Data. Murphy WJ, editor. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2014; 9: e110268. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110268PMID: 25343725