Ten simple rules for responsible referencing

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2018, Pages

  Penders, Bart ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SIMPLE++;

CITATION ANALYSIS; CONTENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; PUBLICATION; REFERENCE DATABASE; RESEARCH PRIORITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; WEB OF SCIENCE; BIOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLICATIONS; SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION;

EID: 85046372302     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006036     Document Type: Editorial

References (17)

1. Fong E, Wilhite A, Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research. PloS ONE. 2017;12(12):e0187394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187394 29211744
2. Feller I, Performance measurement and the governance of American academic science. Minerva. 2009;47(3):323.
3. Garfield E, Merton R, Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities: New York: Wiley; 1979.
4. Wouters P, The citation culture. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam; 1999.
5. Dahler-Larsen P, Constitutive effects of performance indicator systems. Dilemmas of engagement: Evaluation and the new public management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2007. p. 17–35.
6. De Rijcke S, Wouters P, Rushforth A, Franssen T, Hammarfelt B, Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review. Research Evaluation. 2016;25(2):161–9.
7. Bornmann L, Daniel H-D, What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of documentation. 2008;64(1):45–80.
8. Müller R, de Rijcke S, Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences. Research Evaluation. 2017;26(3):157–68.
9. Hicks D, Wouters P, Waltman L, De Rijcke S, Rafols I, Bibliometrics: the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature. 2015;520:429–31. doi: 10.1038/520429a 25903611
10. Shaw D, The Trojan Citation and the “Accidental” Plagiarist. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 2016;13(1):7–9. doi: 10.1007/s11673-015-9696-7 26780105
11. Nature GeneticsNeutral citation is poor scholarship. Nature Genetics. 2017;49:1559. doi: 10.1038/ng.3989 29074946
12. Hyland K, Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2003;54(3):251–9.
13. Jackson D, Walter G, Daly J, Cleary M, Multiple outputs from single studies: Acceptable division of findings vs. ‘salami’ slicing. Journal of clinical nursing. 2014;23(1–2):1–2. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12439 24313937
14. Peritz B, A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields. Scientometrics. 1983;5(5):303–12.
15. Bazerman C, Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press; 1988.
16. Goffman E, Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience.Cambrdige, MA: Harvard University Press; 1974.
17. Aksnes D, Rip A, Researchers’ perceptions of citations. Research Policy. 2009;38(6):895–905.