Developing a core outcome set for people living with dementia at home in their neighbourhoods and communities: Study protocol for use in the evaluation of non-pharmacological community-based health and social care interventions

Trials

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Harding, Andrew J E ^a   Morbey, Hazel ^a   Ahmed, Faraz ^a   Opdebeeck, Carol ^b   Wang, Ying Ying ^a   Williamson, Paula ^c   Swarbrick, Caroline ^d   Leroi, Iracema ^d   Challis, David ^d   Davies, Linda ^d   Reeves, David ^d   Holland, Fiona ^d   Hann, Mark ^d   Hellström, Ingrid ^e   Hydén, Lars Christer ^e   Burns, Alistair ^d   Keady, John ^d,f   Reilly, Siobhan ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^e LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^f GREATER MANCHESTER MENTAL HEALTH NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Community based programmes; Core outcome set; Delphi method; Dementia; Neighbourhood; Non pharmacological interventions; Public involvement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; DELPHI STUDY; DEMENTIA; EVALUATION STUDY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL CARE; UNITED KINGDOM; CONSENSUS; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DEMOGRAPHY; ELDERLY CARE; INDEPENDENT LIVING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL WORK; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; CONSENSUS; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCES AS TOPIC; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; DEMENTIA; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE AGED; HUMANS; INDEPENDENT LIVING; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIAL WORK; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 85045884208     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2584-9     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alzheimer's Society. Support. Stay. Save. Care and Support of People with Dementia in Their Own Homes. London: Alzheimer's Society; 2011.
2. Facts for the media. https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/info/20027/news_and_media/541/facts_for_the_media. Accessed 19 Sept 2017.
3. Department of Health. Living Well with Dementia: A National Dementia Strategy. Leeds: Department of Health; 2009.
4. Minghella E. Transforming Models of Care for People Living with Dementia. Improving Experiences and Outcomes for People with Dementia and their Carers and Families. Manchester: Dementia Partnerships; 2012.
5. Department of Health. Quality Outcomes for People with Dementia: Building on the Work of the National Dementia Strategy. 2010.
6. Katona C, Livingston G, Cooper C, Ames D, Brodaty H, Chiu E. International Psychogeriatric Association consensus statement on defining and measuring treatment benefit in dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2007;19(3):345-54.
7. Webster L, Groskreutz D, Grinbergs-Saull A, Howard R, Brien J, Mountain G, et al. Core outcome measures for interventions to prevent or slow the progress of dementia for people living with mild to moderate dementia: systematic review and consensus recommendations. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179521.
8. Nishant Verma S, Beretvas N, Pascual B, Masdeu JC, Markey MK. The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative. New Scoring methodology improves the sensitivity of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) in clinical trials. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015;7:1-17.
9. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) http://www.oxfordmedicaleducation.com/geriatrics/mini-mental-state-examination-mmse. Accessed 13 Sept 2017.
10. Bonifacio G, Zamboni G. Brain imaging in dementia. Postgrad Med J. 2015;92:333-40.
11. Jekel K, Damian M, Wattmo C, Hausner L, Bullock R, Connelly PJ, et al. Mild cognitive impairment and deficits in instrumental activities of daily living: a systematic review. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015;7:1-20.
12. Saxton J, Snitz BE, Lopez OL, Ives DG, Dunn LO, Fitzpatrick A, et al. Functional and cognitive criteria produce different rates of MCI and conversion to dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80:737-43.
13. Cummings J. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire: background and administration. Mary S. Easton Center for Alzheimer's Disease Research: Los Angeles; 1994.
14. Banerjee S. DEMQOL a patient reported outcome measure for use in dementia - development to address the need for evaluations of cost effectiveness as well as clinical effectiveness. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2012;15:S1.
15. Moniz-Cook E, Vernooij-dassen M, Woods R, Verhey F, Chattat R, Vugt MD, et al. A European consensus on outcome measures for psychosocial intervention research in dementia care. Aging Ment Health. 2008;12:14-29.
16. Reilly S, Miranda-Castillo C, Malouf R, Hoe J, Toot S, Challis D, Orrell M. Case management approaches to home support for people with dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015, Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008345.pub2.
17. Sansoni J, Marosszeky N, Jeon Y-H, Chenoweth L, Hawthorne G, King M, et al. Final Report: Dementia Outcomes Measurement Suite Project. Wollongong: University of Wollongong; 2007.
18. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E, et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials. 2012;13:132-9.
19. Bamford C, Bruce E. Defining the outcomes of community care: the perspectives of older people with dementia and their carers. Ageing Soc. 2000;20:543-70.
20. Corbett J, d'Angelo C, Gangitano L, Freeman J. Future of Health. Findings from a Survey of Stakeholders on the Future of Health and Healthcare in England. Cambridge: RAND Europe; 2017.
21. Gorst SL, Gargon E, Clarke M, Smith V, Williamson PR. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: an updated review and identification of gaps. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0168403.
22. Sinha I, Smyth R, Williamson PR. Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trial: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. PLoS Med. 2011;8(1):e1000393.
23. Healthcare at Home. Dementia Care: Understanding Out-of-hospital Dementia Care. 2011.
24. Keady J. Neighbourhoods and dementia: an introduction to the study. J Dementia Care. 2014;22(6):12-13.
25. Morgan D, Krueger R. When to use focus groups and why. In: Morgan D, editor. Successful focus groups. London: Sage Publications; 1993.
26. Sutcliffe CL, Roe B, Jasper R, Jolley D, Challis DJ. People with dementia and carers' experiences of dementia care and services: outcomes of a focus group study. Dementia. 2013; https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301213511957.
27. Hellström I, Nolan M, Nordenfelt L, Lundh U. Ethical and methodological issues in interviewing persons with dementia. Nurs Ethics. 2007;14:608-19.
28. Ritchie J, Lewis J, Elam G. Designing and selecting samples. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage, 2009.
29. McNair AGK, Whistance RN, Forsythe RO, Macefield R, Rees J, Pullyblank AM, et al. Core outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery: a consensus study. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1002071.
30. Colucci E. Focus groups can be fun. The use of activity-oriented questions in focus group discussions. Qual Health Res. 2007;17:1422-33.
31. Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN, Rook DW. Focus groups. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2007.
32. Wood C. Co-produced and patient reported experience outcomes for dementia: a report. London: Health Innovation Network South London; 2014.
33. Keeley T, Williamson P, Callery P, Jones LL, Mathers J, Jones J, et al. The use of qualitative methods to inform Delphi surveys in core outcome set development. Trials. 2016;17:230.
34. Jones JE, Jones LL, Keeley TJH, Calvert MJ, Mathers J. A review of patient and carer participation and the use of qualitative research in the development of core outcome sets. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0172937.
35. Gove D, Diaz-Ponce A, Georges J, Moniz-Cook E, Mountain G, Chattat R, et al. Alzheimer Europe's position on involving people with dementia in research through PPI (patient and public involvement). Aging Ment Health. 2017;22:723-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1317334.
36. Novek S, Wilkinson H. Safe and inclusive research practices for qualitative research involving people with dementia: a review of key issues and strategies. Dementia. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301217701274.
37. Scottish Dementia Working Group Research Sub-Group UK. Core principles for involving people with dementia in research: innovative practice. Dementia (London). 2014;13:680-5.
38. Schünemann H, Brozek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A (editors). The GRADE Working Group. GRADE Handbook for Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations. Available from http://gdt.guidelinedevelopment.org/app/handbook/handbook.html. Updated October 2013.
39. Keeley T, Khan H, Pinfold V, Williamson P, Mathers J, Davies L. Core outcome sets for use in effectiveness trials involving people with bipolar and schizophrenia in a community-based setting (PARTNERS2): study protocol for the development of two core outcome sets. Trials. 2015;16:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0553-0.
40. Young B, Bagley H. Including patients in core outcome set development: issues to consider based on three workshops with around 100 international delegates. Res Involv Engage. 2016;2:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-016-0039-6.
41. Mokkink L, Terwee C, Patrick D, ALsonso J, Knol D, Bouter L, et al. COSMIN checklist manual. Netherlands: VU University Medical Center; 2012.
42. Burr J, Kilonzo M, Vale L, Ryan M. Developing a preference-based glaucoma utility index using a discrete choice experiment. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(8):797-808
43. Bowen A, Hesketh A, Patchick E, Young A, Davies LM, Vail A, et al. Clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and service users' perceptions of early, well-resourced communication therapy following a stroke: a randomised controlled trial (the ACT NoW study). Health Technol Assess. 2012;16:1-160.