Core Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Consensus Study

PLoS Medicine

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2016, Pages

  McNair, Angus G K ^a,b   Whistance, Robert N ^a,c   Forsythe, Rachael O ^a,c   Macefield, Rhiannon ^a   Rees, Jonathan ^a   Pullyblank, Anne M ^d   Avery, Kerry N L ^a   Brookes, Sara T ^a   Thomas, Michael G ^c   Sylvester, Paul A ^c   Russell, Ann ^e   Oliver, Alfred ^e   Morton, Dion ^f   Kennedy, Robin ^g   Jayne, David G ^h   Huxtable, Richard ^a   Hackett, Roland ⁱ   Dutton, Susan J ^j   Coleman, Mark G ^k   Card, Mia ^c   Brown, Julia ^l   Blazeby, Jane M ^a,c   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b Bristol Medical School   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BRISTOL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d NORTH BRISTOL NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^e INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^g ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^h ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ South West Cancer Network   (United Kingdom)

^j UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^k PLYMOUTH HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^l UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURVIVAL; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONSENSUS; DEFECATION URGENCY; DELPHI STUDY; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; LIKERT SCALE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SEXUAL FUNCTION; STOMA; SURGICAL INFECTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; VERY ELDERLY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; ONCOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84988953588     PISSN: 15491277     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002071     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hirsch BR, Califf RM, Cheng SK, Tasneem A, Horton J, Chiswell K, et al. Characteristics of oncology clinical trials: insights from a systematic analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov. JAMA internal medicine. 2013;173(11):972–9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.62723699837.
2. Meher S, Alfirevic Z, Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2014;121(10):1188–94; discussion 95–6. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.1259324571433.
3. Tsichlaki A, O'Brien K, Do orthodontic research outcomes reflect patient values? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials involving children. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics: official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. 2014;146(3):279–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.05.02225172249.
4. Rodgers S, Brealey S, Jefferson L, McDaid C, Maund E, Hanchard N, et al. Exploring the outcomes in studies of primary frozen shoulder: is there a need for a core outcome set?Qual Life Res. 2014;23(9):2495–504. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0708-624817317.
5. Kirkham JJ, Dwan KM, Altman DG, Gamble C, Dodd S, Smyth R, et al. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews. BMJ. 2010;340:c365. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c36520156912.
6. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E, et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials. 2012;13:132. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-13222867278; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3472231.
7. US Department of Health Human Services FDA. 1999.
8. Guideline on Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products other than NSAIDs for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products [Internet]. 2003. http://www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003439.pdf.
9. Khan K, The CROWN Initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women's health. Midwifery. 2014;30(12):1147–8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.10.00125434973.
10. Boers M, Brooks P, Strand CV, Tugwell P, The OMERACT filter for Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. The Journal of rheumatology. 1998;25(2):198–9. 9489805.
11. McGrath PJ, Walco GA, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Brown MT, Davidson K, et al. Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations. The journal of pain: official journal of the American Pain Society. 2008;9(9):771–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.04.00718562251.
12. Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M, Horey D, OB C, Evaluating maternity care: a core set of outcome measures. Birth. 2007;34(2):164–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00145.x17542821.
13. World Health O. Colorectal cancer Estimated Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012 2012 [cited 2012 23/12/2015]. http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx?cancer=colorectal.
14. Sullivan R, Alatise OI, Anderson BO, Audisio R, Autier P, Aggarwal A, et al. Global cancer surgery: delivering safe, affordable, and timely cancer surgery. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(11):1193–224. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00223-526427363.
15. Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer HJ, Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 2008; (2). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003432.pub2/abstracthttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/14651858.CD003432.pub2/asset/CD003432.pdf?v=1&t=i87721gi&s=25558cf9cff7916b003eb2494dbc515efaf81abf.
16. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker Jens J, Müller Joachim M, Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 2005; (2). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2/abstracthttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2/asset/CD003145.pdf?v=1&t=i8771wha&s=5dd1f7c09f5a835a98ee37ce5c1227d75927ce18.
17. Whistance RN, Forsythe RO, McNair AG, Brookes ST, Avery KN, Pullyblank AM, et al. A systematic review of outcome reporting in colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(10):e548–60. doi: 10.1111/codi.1237823926896.
18. McNair A, Whistance RN, Forsythe RO, Rees J, Jones JE, Pullyblank AM, et al. Synthesis and summary of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to inform the development of a core outcome set in colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2015. doi: 10.1111/codi.1302126058878.
19. Macefield RC, Jacobs M, Korfage IJ, Nicklin J, Whistance RN, Brookes ST, et al. Developing core outcomes sets: methods for identifying and including patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Trials. 2014;15:49. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-4924495582; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3916696.
20. Powell C, The Delphi technique: myths and realities. J Adv Nurs. 2003;41(4):376–82. 12581103.
21. COMET Initiative. COMET database 2015 [20/05/2015]. http://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/search.
22. Reeve BB, Mitchell SA, Dueck AC, Basch E, Cella D, Reilly CM, et al. Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(7). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju12925006191; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4110472.
23. Main BG, Blencowe N, Williamson PR, Blazeby JM, RE: Recommended Patient-Reported Core Set of Symptoms to Measure in Adult Cancer Treatment Trials. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2015;107(4). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju506
24. Main BG, Strong S, McNair AG, Falk SJ, Crosby T, Blazeby JM, Reporting outcomes of definitive radiation-based treatment for esophageal cancer: a review of the literature. Dis Esophagus. 2014. doi: 10.1111/dote.1216824438540.
25. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.00620494804.