Correction to: A randomised clinical trial comparing the ‘sniffing’ and neutral position using channelled (KingVision ®) and non-channelled (C-MAC ®) videolaryngoscopes (Anaesthesia, (2018), 73, 7, (847-855), 10.1111/anae.14289);A randomised clinical trial comparing the ‘sniffing’ and neutral position using channelled (KingVision®) and non-channelled (C-MAC®) videolaryngoscopes

Anaesthesia

Volumn 73, Issue 7, 2018, Pages 847-855

  Mendonca, C ^a   Ungureanu, N ^b,c   Nowicka, A ^a   Kumar, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS COVENTRY AND WARWICKSHIRE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b DERBY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

airway management; intubation; laryngoscopes; laryngoscopy; tracheal

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LARYNGOSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODIFIED INTUBATION DIFFICULTY SCALE; NEUTRAL POSITION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT POSITIONING; PERCENTAGE OF GLOTTIC OPENING SCORE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SNIFFING POSITION; AGED; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; GLOTTIS; LARYNGOSCOPE; PROCEDURES; RESPIRATION CONTROL; VIDEORECORDING;

ADULT; AGED; AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; FEMALE; GLOTTIS; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPES; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT POSITIONING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 85045854505     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/anae.14748     Document Type: Erratum

References (33)

1. El-Orbany M, Woehlck H, Salem MR. Head and neck position for direct laryngoscopy. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2011; 113: 103–9.
2. Greenland KB, Edwards MJ, Hutton NJ, Challis VJ, Irwin MG, Sleigh JW. Changes in airway configuration with different head and neck positions using magnetic resonance imaging of normal airways: a new concept with possible clinical applications. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2010; 105: 683–90.
3. Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, et al. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2015; 115: 827–48.
4. Marshall SD, Pandit JJ. Radical evolution: the 2015 Difficult Airway Society guidelines for managing unanticipated difficult or failed tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 131–7.
5. Sakles JC, Chiu S, Mosier J, Walker C, Stolz U. Reardon RF, editor. The importance of first pass success when performing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine 2013; 20: 71–8.
6. Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2004; 99: 607–13.
7. Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation (Review). Cochrane Database Systematic Review 2016; 11: CD011136.
8. van Zundert A, Pieters B, van Zundert T, Gatt S. Avoiding palatopharyngeal trauma during videolaryngoscopy: do not forget the ‘blind spots’. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2012; 56: 532–4.
9. Kelly FE, Cook TM. Seeing is believing: getting the best out of videolaryngoscopy. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2016; 117(Suppl. 1): i9–i13.
10. ® with D-blade: secondary analysis from a large comparative videolaryngoscopy trial. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2016; 117: 118–23.
11. Levitan RM, Heitz JW, Sweeney M, Cooper RM. The complexities of tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy and alternative intubation devices. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2011; 57: 240–7.
12. Chemsian RV, Bhananker S, Ramaiah R. Videolaryngoscopy. International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science 2014; 4: 35–41.
13. Kleine-Brueggeney M, Greif R, Schoettker P, Savoldelli GL, Nabecker S, Theiler LG. Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2016; 116: 670–9.
14. ® aBlade Video Laryngoscope, 2018. https://www.ambu.com/products/airway-management/video-laryngoscopes/product/king-vision-ablade (accessed 21/01/2018).
15. ® videolaryngoscope. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 369–78.
16. Greenland KB, Edwards MJ, Hutton NJ. External auditory meatus-sternal notch relationship in adults in the sniffing position: a magnetic resonance imaging study. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2010; 104: 268–9.
17. Marfin AG, Iqbal R, Mihm F, Popat MT, Scott SH, Pandit JJ. Determination of the site of tracheal impingement during nasotracheal fibreoptic intubation. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 646–50.
18. Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, et al. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS): proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 1997; 87: 1290–7.
19. Levitan RM, Ochroch EA, Kush S, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale. Academic Emergency Medicine 1998; 5: 919–23.
20. Maharaj CH, O'Croinin D, Curley G, Harte H, Laffey JG. A comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq or the Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 1093–9.
21. Malik MA, Subramaniam R, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Randomized controlled trial of the Pentax AWS, Glidescope, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in predicted difficult intubation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009; 103: 761–8.
22. ® laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008; 101: 723–30.
23. Kleine-Brueggeney M, Buttenberg M, Greif R, Nabecker S, Theiler L. Evaluation of three unchannelled videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway: a randomised, controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 370–8.
24. ® and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients undergoing tracheal intubation with cervical spine immobilization. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2011; 107: 258–64.
25. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2014; 14: 135.
26. Pandit JJ. The analysis of variance in anaesthetic research: statistics, history and biography. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 1212–20.
27. Weingart SD, Levitan RM. Preoxygenation and prevention of desaturation during emergency airway management. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2012; 59: 165–75.
28. Sajayan A, Wicker J, Ungureanu N, Mendonca C, Kimani PK. Current practice of rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia in the UK – a national survey. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2016; 117(Suppl. 1): i69–74.
29. Greenland KB. A proposed model for direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 156–61.
30. Serocki G, Neumann T, Scharf E, Dörges V, Cavus E. Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: a randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways. Minerva Anestesiologica 2013; 79: 121–9.
31. ® D-blade videolaryngoscope during routine and difficult intubation. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2011; 112: 382–5.
32. Alvis BD, Hester D, Watson D, Higgins M, St. Jacques P. Randomized controlled trial comparing the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope with the King Vision video laryngoscope in adult patients. Minerva Anestesiologica 2016; 82: 30–5.
33. Emsley JG, Hung OR. A ’VL tube’ for endotracheal intubation using video laryngoscopy. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2016; 63: 782–3.