Erratum to: Online information seeking by patients with bipolar disorder: results from an international multisite survey (Int J Bipolar Disord, (2016), 4, (1), 10.1186/s40345-016-0058-0);Online information seeking by patients with bipolar disorder: results from an international multisite survey

International Journal of Bipolar Disorders

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Conell, Jörn ^a   Bauer, Rita ^a   Glenn, Tasha ^b   Alda, Martin ^c   Ardau, Raffaella ^d   Baune, Bernhard T ^e   Berk, Michael ^f,g,h,i,j   Bersudsky, Yuly ^k   Bilderbeck, Amy ^l   Bocchetta, Alberto ^m   Bossini, Letizia ⁿ   Paredes Castro, Angela Marianne ^f,g   Cheung, Eric Yat Wo ^o   Chillotti, Caterina ^d   Choppin, Sabine ^p   Del Zompo, Maria ^m   Dias, Rodrigo ^q   Dodd, Seetal ^f,g,h   Duffy, Anne ^r   Etain, Bruno ^p   Fagiolini, Andrea ⁿ   Garnham, Julie ^c   Geddes, John ^l   Gildebro, Jonas ^s   Gonzalez Pinto, Ana ^t   Goodwin, Guy M ^l   Grof, Paul ^u,v   Harima, Hirohiko ^w   Hassel, Stefanie ^x   Henry, Chantal ^p,y   Hidalgo Mazzei, Diego ^z   Kapur, Vaisnvy ^aa   Kunigiri, Girish ^ab   Lafer, Beny ^q   Lam, Chun ^ac   Larsen, Erik Roj ^s   Lewitzka, Ute ^a   Licht, Rasmus ^ad,ae   Lund, Anne Hvenegaard ^s   Misiak, Blazej ^af   Piotrowski, Patryk ^af   Monteith, Scott ^ag   Munoz, Rodrigo ^ah   Nakanotani, Takako ^ai   Nielsen, René E ^ad   O’Donovan, Claire ^c   Okamura, Yasushi ^w   Osher, Yamima ^k   Reif, Andreas ^aj   Ritter, Philipp ^a   Rybakowski, Janusz K ^ak   Sagduyu, Kemal ^al   Sawchuk, Brett ^r   Schwartz, Elon ^am   Scippa, Ângela Miranda ^an   Slaney, Claire ^c   Sulaiman, Ahmad Hatim ^ao   Suominen, Kirsi ^ap   Suwalska, Aleksandra ^ak   Tam, Peter ^aq   Tatebayashi, Yoshitaka ^ai   Tondo, Leonardo ^ar,as   Vieta, Eduard ^z   Vinberg, Maj ^at   Viswanath, Biju ^aa   Volkert, Julia ^aj   Zetin, Mark ^au   Zorrilla, Iñaki ^t   Whybrow, Peter C ^av   Bauer, Michael ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARL GUSTAV CARUS   (Germany)

^b ChronoRecord Association   (United States)

^c DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d DEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGY   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^f DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^g BARWON HEALTH   (Australia)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

ⁱ FLOREY INSTITUTE OF NEUROSCIENCE AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Australia)

^j THE NATIONAL CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE IN YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH   (Australia)

^k BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^l WARNEFORD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^m UNIVERSITY OF CAGLIARI   (Italy)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^o CASTLE PEAK HOSPITAL   (Hong Kong)

^p HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

^q UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^r UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^s AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^t UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^u Mood Disorders Center of Ottawa   (Canada)

^v UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^w TOKYO METROPOLITAN MATSUZAWA HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^x ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^y INSTITUT PASTEUR   (France)

^z UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^aa NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND NEUROSCIENCES   (India)

^ab LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^ac KOWLOON HOSPITAL   (Hong Kong)

^ad AALBORG UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^ae AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^af WROCLAW MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^ag MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^ah UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^ai TOKYO METROPOLITAN INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

^aj UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FRANKFURT   (Germany)

^ak POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Poland)

^al UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^am Croton on Hudson   (United States)

^an FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF BAHIA   (Brazil)

^ao UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

^ap City of Helsinki   (Finland)

^aq UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^ar MCLEAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^as Centro Lucio Bini   (Italy)

^at Psychiatric Center Copenhagen   (Denmark)

^au CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^av UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BIPOLAR DISORDER; BRAZIL; CANADA; COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH; DENMARK; DRUG INFORMATION; FEMALE; FINLAND; FRANCE; GERMANY; HEALTH SURVEY; HONG KONG; HUMAN; INDIA; INFORMATION SEEKING; INTERNET ADDICTION; ISRAEL; ITALY; JAPAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALAYSIA; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; ONLINE SYSTEM; POLAND; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RURAL AREA; SMARTPHONE; SPAIN; TELECOMMUNICATION; URBAN AREA;

EID: 85045638118     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21947511     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s40345-017-0082-8     Document Type: Erratum

References (112)

1. Arthur C. Google’s growing problem: 50% of people do zero searches per day on mobile. 2015. https://www.theoverspill.wordpress.com/2015/10/19/searches-average-mobile-google-problem. Accessed 7 June 2016.
2. Baldessarini RJ, Perry R, Pike J. Factors associated with treatment nonadherence among US bipolar disorder patients. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2008;23:95–105.
3. Barnes C, Harvey R, Wilde A, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Wilhelm K, Mitchell PB. Review of the quality of information on bipolar disorder on the Internet. Aust NZ J Psychiatry. 2009;43:934–45.
4. Bates JA, Whitehead R, Bolge SC, Kim E. Correlates of medication adherence among patients with bipolar disorder: results of the Bipolar Evaluation of Satisfaction and Tolerability (BEST) Study: a nationwide cross-sectional survey. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;12:333–8.
5. Bauer R, Conell J, Glenn T, Alda M, Ardau R, Baune BT, et al. Internet use by patients with bipolar disorder: results from an international multisite survey. Psychiatry Res. 2016;242:388–94.
6. Bauer R, Bauer M, Spiessl H, Kagerbauer T. Cyber-support: an analysis of online self-help forums (online self-help forums in bipolar disorder). Nord J Psychiatry. 2013;67(3):185–90.
7. Bennett NL, Casebeer LL, Kristofco RE, Strasser SM. Physicians’ internet information-seeking behaviors. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2004;24:31–8.
8. Berger M, Wagner TH, Baker LC. Internet use and stigmatized illness. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:1821–7.
9. Bowman CM. Basics of international privacy law for commercial litigators, part 1: the EU. The National Law Review. 2016. http://www.natlawreview.com/article/basics-international-privacy-law-commercial-litigators-part-1-eu. Accessed 7 June 2016.
10. Bowskill R, Clatworthy J, Parham R, Rank T, Horne R. Patients’ perceptions of information received about medication prescribed for bipolar disorder: implications for informed choice. J Affect Disord. 2007;100:253–7.
11. Brashers DE, Goldsmith DJ, Hsieh E. Information seeking and avoiding in health contexts. Hum Commun Res. 2002;28:258–71.
12. Bunz U, Curry C, Voon W. Perceived versus actual computer-email-web fluency. Comput Human Behav. 2007;23:2321–44.
13. Chan JK, Farrer LM, Gulliver A, Bennett K, Griffiths KM. University students’ views on the perceived benefits and drawbacks of seeking help for mental health problems on the Internet: a qualitative study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2016;3(1):e3.
14. Chew SW, Khoo CS. Comparison of drug information on consumer drug review sites versus authoritative health information websites. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2016;67:333–49.
15. Chung JE. Patient-provider discussion of online health information: results from the 2007 health information national trends survey (HINTS). J Health Commun. 2013;18:627–48.
16. Cisco. Cisco visual networking index: global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2015–2020 White Paper. 2016. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/mobile-white-paper-c11-520862.html. Accessed 7 June 2016.
17. Clarke MA, Belden JL, Koopman RJ, Steege LM, Moore JL, Canfield SM, et al. Information needs and information-seeking behaviour analysis of primary care physicians and nurses: a literature review. Health Info Libr J. 2013;30:178–90.
18. Clauson KA, Polen HH, Boulos MN, Dzenowagis JH. Scope, completeness, and accuracy of drug information in Wikipedia. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42:1814–21.
19. Coberly E, Boren SA, Davis JW, McConnell AL, Chitima-Matsiga R, Ge B, et al. Linking clinic patients to Internet-based, condition-specific information prescriptions. J Med Libr Assoc. 2010;98:160–4.
20. Crangle CE, Kart JB. A questions-based investigation of consumer mental-health information. PeerJ. 2015;31(3):e867.
21. Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Ng JJ, Reinert SE, Friedmann PD, Moulton AW. Patients’ use of the internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:180–5.
22. Dixon P, Gellman B. World privacy forum. The scoring of America: how secret consumer scores threaten your privacy and your future. 2014. https://www.worldprivacyforum.org/2014/04/wpf-report-the-scoring-of-america-how-secret-consumer-scores-threaten-your-privacy-and-your-future. Accessed 7 June 2016.
23. Eavis P. How you’re making facebook a money machine. New York Times. 2016. http://www.mobile.nytimes.com/2016/04/30/upshot/how-youre-making-facebook-a-money-machine.html. Accessed 7 June 2016.
24. European Parliament News. Q&A: new EU rules on data protection put the citizen back in the driving seat. 2016. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/20160413BKG22980/QA-new-EU-rules-on-data-protection-put-the-citizen-back-in-the-driving-seat. Accessed 7 June 2016.
25. Eurostat. Foreign language learning statistics. 2016. http://www.ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Foreign_language_learning_statistics. Accessed 7 June 2016.
26. Ford EW, Walls VU. Effective US health system websites: establishing benchmarks and standards for effective consumer engagement/practitioner application. J Healthc Manag. 2012;57:47.
27. Fox S. Peer-to-peer health care. Pew research. 2011. http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/02/28/peer-to-peer-health-care-2. Accessed 7 June 2016.
28. Fox S, Duggan M. Health online. Pew research. 2013. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Health-online.aspx. Accessed 7 June 2016.
29. Friedman A. The future of search engines is context. 2015. http://www.searchengineland.com/future-search-engines-context-217550. Accessed 7 June 2016.
30. FTC (Federal Trade Commission). Data brokers: a call for transparency and accountability. 2014. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/data-brokers-call-transparency-accountability-report-federal-trade-commission-may-2014/140527databrokerreport.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2016.
31. Gaglio B, Glasgow RE, Bull SS. Do patient preferences for health information vary by health literacy or numeracy? A qualitative assessment. J Health Commun. 2012;17(sup3):109–21.
32. Ghoshal M, Walji MF. Quality of medication information available on retail pharmacy web sites. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2006;2:479–98.
33. Giacco D, Luciano M, Del Vecchio V, Sampogna G, Slade M, Clarke E, et al. Desire for information of people with severe mental illness. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014;49:1883–91.
34. Gidwani R, Zulman D. Association between acute medical exacerbations and consuming or producing web-based health information: analysis from Pew survey data. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e145.
35. Glenn T, Monteith S. Privacy in the digital world: medical and health data outside of HIPAA protections. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014;16:1–1.
36. Google. A remedy for your health-related questions: health info in the Knowledge Graph. 2015. https://www.googleblog.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/health-info-knowledge-graph.html. Accessed 7 June 2016.
37. Greengard S. Advertising gets personal. Commun ACM. 2012;55:18–20.
38. Grohol JM, Slimowicz J, Granda R. The quality of mental health information commonly searched for on the Internet. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014;17:216–21.
39. Hallett C, Gupta S, Priebe S. What do outpatients with schizophrenia and mood disorders want to learn about their illness? Psychiatr Serv. 2013;64:764–9.
40. Hasty RT, Garbalosa RC, Barbato VA, Valdes PJ Jr, Powers DW, Hernandez E, et al. Wikipedia vs peer-reviewed medical literature for information about the 10 most costly medical conditions. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014;114:368–73.
41. Hay MC, Cadigan RJ, Khanna D, Strathmann C, Lieber E, Altman R, et al. Prepared patients: internet information seeking by new rheumatology patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:575–82.
42. Heilman JM, West AG. Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(3):e62.
43. Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, Croyle RT, Arora NK, Rimer BK, et al. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2618–24.
44. Hidalgo-Mazzei D, Mateu A, Reinares M, Matic A, Vieta E, Colom F. Internet-based psychological interventions for bipolar disorder: review of the present and insights into the future. J Affect Disord. 2015;188:1–3.
45. Hofstede Cultural Dimensions. 2016. https://www.geert-hofstede.com/national-culture.html. Accessed 7 June 2016.
46. Horgan A, Sweeney J. Young students’ use of the internet for mental health information and support. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2010;17:117–23.
47. Hughes S, Cohen D. Can online consumers contribute to drug knowledge? A mixed-methods comparison of consumer-generated and professionally controlled psychotropic medication information on the internet. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e53.
48. Hwang TJ, Bourgeois FT, Seeger JD. Drug safety in the digital age. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2460–2.
49. Imes RS, Bylund CL, Sabee CM, Routsong TR, Sanford AA. Patients’ reasons for refraining from discussing internet health information with their healthcare providers. Health Commun. 2008;23:538–47.
50. Ivanitskaya L, O’Boyle I, Casey AM. Health information literacy and competencies of information age students: results from the interactive online Research Readiness Self-Assessment (RRSA). J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(2):e6.
51. Johnson FR, Özdemir S, Manjunath R, Hauber AB, Burch SP, Thompson TR. Factors that affect adherence to bipolar disorder treatments: a stated-preference approach. Med Care. 2007;45:545–52.
52. Kawado M, Hinotsu S, Matsuyama Y, Yamaguchi T, Hashimoto S, Ohashi Y. A comparison of error detection rates between the reading aloud method and the double data entry method. Control Clin Trials. 2003;24:560–9.
53. Kim J, Kim S. Physicians’ perception of the effects of internet health information on the doctor–patient relationship. Inform Health Soc Care. 2009;34:136–48.
54. Klee A, Stacy M, Rosenheck R, Harkness L, Tsai J. Interest in technology-based therapies hampered by access: a survey of veterans with serious mental illnesses. Psychiatr Rehabil J; 2016 [Epub ahead of print].
55. Koppen L, Phillips J, Papageorgiou R. Analysis of reference sources used in drug-related Wikipedia articles. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015;103:140.
56. Korp P. Health on the Internet: implications for health promotion. Health Educ Res. 2006;21:78–86.
57. Kupferberg N, Protus BM. Accuracy and completeness of drug information in Wikipedia: an assessment. J Med Libr Assoc. 2011;99:310–3.
58. Lambert SD, Loiselle CG. Health information—seeking behavior. Qual Health Res. 2007;17:1006–19.
59. Laurent MR, Vickers TJ. Seeking health information online: does Wikipedia matter? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:471–9.
60. Lavsa SM, Corman SL, Culley CM, Pummer TL. Reliability of Wikipedia as a medication information source for pharmacy students. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2011;3:154–8.
61. Leon SA, Fontelo P. MedlinePlus en Espanol and Spanish-speakers. AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2016:1028.
62. Li J. Privacy policies for health social networking sites. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:704–7.
63. Libert T. Privacy implications of health information seeking on the web. Commun ACM. 2015;58:68–77.
64. Link TW, Hefner JL, Ford EW, Huerta TR. An effective web presence for substance abuse treatment facilities. Subst Use Misuse. 2016;51:664–7.
65. Lupton D. The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociol Health Illn. 2014;36:856–69.
66. Mackey TK, Cuomo RE, Liang BA. The rise of digital direct-to-consumer advertising? Comparison of direct-to-consumer advertising expenditure trends from publicly available data sources and global policy implications. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:1.
67. MacMillan D. Mobile search tops at Google. Oct 8 2015. Wall Street Journal. (WSJ.D). 2015. http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2015/10/08/google-says-mobile-searches-surpass-those-on-pcs. Accessed 7 June 2016.
68. McCray AT, Loane RF, Browne AC, Bangalore AK. Terminology issues in user access to Web-based medical information. In: Proceedings of the AMIA symposium. Bethesda: American Medical Informatics Association; 1999. p. 107.
69. McKibbon KA, Fridsma DB. Effectiveness of clinician-selected electronic information resources for answering primary care physicians’ information needs. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:653–9.
70. MedlinePlus. About MedlinePlus. 2016. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/aboutmedlineplus.html. Accessed 7 June 2016.
71. Meier A, Lyons E, Frydman G, Forlenza M, Rimer B. How cancer survivors provide support on cancer-related Internet mailing lists. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;9:e12.
72. Merritt K, Smith D, Renzo JC. An investigation of self-reported computer literacy: is it reliable. Issues Inf Syst. 2005;6:289–95.
73. Miller CJ, McInnes DK, Stolzmann K, Bauer MS. Interest in use of technology for healthcare among veterans receiving treatment for mental health. Telemedicine and e-health. Telemed J E Health. 2016. [Epub ahead of print].
74. Miller N. Analysis of user messages to MedlinePlus. gov. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007;95:81.
75. Mitchell KJ, Wells M, Priebe G, Ybarra ML. Exposure to websites that encourage self-harm and suicide: prevalence rates and association with actual thoughts of self-harm and thoughts of suicide in the United States. J Adolesc. 2014;37:1335–44.
76. Monteith S, Glenn T, Bauer M. Searching the internet for health information about bipolar disorder: some cautionary issues. Int J Bipolar Disord. 2013;1:22.
77. Monteith S, Glenn T, Bauer R, Conell J, Bauer M. Availability of prescription drugs for bipolar disorder at online pharmacies. J Affect Disord. 2016;193:59–65.
78. Morel V, Chatton A, Cochand S, Zullino D, Khazaal Y. Quality of web-based information on bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2008;110:265–9.
79. Murray G, Suto M, Hole R, Hale S, Amari E, Michalak EE. Self-management strategies used by ‘high functioning’ individuals with bipolar disorder: from research to clinical practice. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011;18:95–109.
80. Nambisan P. Information seeking and social support in online health communities: impact on patients’ perceived empathy. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18:298–304.
81. Narayanan A, Huey J, Felten EW. A precautionary approach to big data privacy. In: Gutwirth S, Leenes R, De Hert P, editors. Data protection on the move. Berlin: Springer; 2016. p. 357–85.
82. Neaton JD, Duchene AG, Svendsen KH, Wentworth D. An examination of the efficiency of some quality assurance methods commonly employed in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1990;9:115–23.
83. NHS Choices: How we work. 2015. http://www.nhs.uk/aboutNHSChoices/aboutnhschoices/Aboutus/Pages/Editorialpolicy.aspx. Accessed 7 June 2016.
84. NISO (National Information Standards Organization). Understanding Metadata 2004. http://www.niso.org/publications/press/UnderstandingMetadata.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2016.
85. NLM. Drug information portal. 2016. http://www.druginfo.nlm.nih.gov/drugportal/jsp/drugportal/nlmDrugResources.jsp?APPLICATION_NAME=drugportal. Accessed 7 June 2016.
86. Orizio G, Merla A, Schulz PJ, Gelatti U. Quality of online pharmacies and websites selling prescription drugs: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e74.
87. Pan W. Akaike’s information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics. 2001;57:120–5.
88. Pande M. Wikimedia Foundation. Average Wikipedia reader is 36 years old. 2011. http://www.blog.wikimedia.org/2011/10/21/average-wikipedia-reader-is-36-years-old. Accessed 7 June 2016.
89. Parker B. More than any other foreign language, European youths learn English. Per Research. 2015. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/10/08/more-than-any-other-foreign-language-european-youths-learn-english. Accessed 7 June 2016.
90. Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä M, Saari JK, Närhi U, Karjalainen A, Pylkkänen K, Airaksinen MS, et al. How and why do people with depression access and utilize online drug information: a qualitative study. J Affect Disord. 2009;114:333–9.
91. Rainie L, Kiesler S, Kang R, Madden M, Duggan M, Brown S, et al. Anonymity, privacy, and security online. Pew Res Cent. 2013;5:5.
92. Randhawa AS, Babalola O, Henney Z, Miller M, Nelson T, Oza M, et al. A collaborative assessment among 11 pharmaceutical companies of misinformation in commonly used online drug information compendia. Ann Pharmacother. 2016;50:352–9.
93. Reavley NJ, Jorm AF. The quality of mental disorder information websites: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85:e16–25.
94. Return on Now. 2015 search engine market share by country. 2016. http://www.returnonnow.com/internet-marketing-resources/2015-search-engine-market-share-by-country. Accessed 7 June 2016.
95. Rice RE. Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys. Int J Med Inform. 2006;75:8–28.
96. Rosenberg E. The business of Google. Investopedia. 2015. http://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/020515/business-google.asp. Accessed 7 June 2016.
97. Russ H, Giveon SM, Granek Catarivas M, Yaphe J. The effect of the Internet on the patient-doctor relationship from the patient’s perspective: a survey from primary care. Isr Med Assoc J. 2011;13:220.
98. Schenker Y, London AJ. Risks of imbalanced information on US Hospital Websites. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:441–3.
99. Seife C. 23andMe is terrifying, but not for the reasons the FDA thinks. Sci Am. 2013. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/23andme-is-terrifying-but-not-for-the-reasons-the-fda-thinks/.
100. Sharp E. The first page of Google, by the numbers. 2014. http://www.protofuse.com/blog/first-page-of-google-by-the-numbers/. Accessed 7 June 2016.
101. Sidhu H, Raynor DK, Knapp P. Evaluation of website medicines information content, in comparison with official patient information. Int J Pharm Pract. 2006;14:189–95.
102. Siegel ER, Logan RA, Harnsberger RL, Cravedi K, Krause JA, Lyon B, et al. Information Rx: evaluation of a new informatics tool for physicians, patients, and libraries. Inf Serv Use. 2006;26:1–10.
103. Stark M, Fins JJ. Engineering medical decisions. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2013;22:373–81.
104. Statistica. Average number of search terms for online search queries in the United States as of January 2016. http://www.statista.com/statistics/269740/number-of-search-terms-in-internet-research-in-the-us/. Accessed 7 June 2016.
105. Szmulewicz A, Samamé C, Caravotta P, Martino DJ, Igoa A, Hidalgo-Mazzei D, et al. Behavioral and emotional adverse events of drugs frequently used in the treatment of bipolar disorders: clinical and theoretical implications. Int J Bipolar Disord. 2016;4(1):6.
106. Tustin N. The role of patient satisfaction in online health information seeking. J Health Commun. 2010;15:3–17.
107. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 2015. Education. http://www.data.uis.unesco.org/Index.aspx?queryid=242. Accessed 7 June 2016.
108. Vaidhyanathan S. The Googlization of everything: (and why we should worry). 1st ed. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2012.
109. van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CH, Taal E, Seydel ER, van de Laar MA. Participation in online patient support groups endorses patients’ empowerment. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74:61–9.
110. W3Techs. Usage of content languages for websites. 2016. http://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/content_language/all. Accessed 7 June 2016.
111. Wang L, Wang J, Wang M, Li Y, Liang Y, Xu D. Using internet search engines to obtain medical information: a comparative study. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14:e74.
112. Weaver JB III, Mays D, Weaver SS, Hopkins GL, Eroglu D, Bernhardt JM. Health information-seeking behaviors, health indicators, and health risks. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:1520–5.