Auxin and LANCEOLATE affect leaf shape in tomato via different developmental processes

Plant Signaling and Behavior

Volumn 7, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1255-1257

  Ben Gera, Hadas ^a   Ori, Naomi ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Auxin; CIN TCP; Compound leaf; LANCEOLATE; Leaf development; SlIAA9 ENTIRE; Tomato

Indexed keywords

INDOLEACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PLANT LEAF; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TOMATO;

GENOTYPE; INDOLEACETIC ACIDS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MUTATION; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 85045352305     PISSN: 15592316     EISSN: 15592324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/psb.21550     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Dengler NG, Tsukaya H. Leaf morphogenesis in dicotyledons: current issues. Int J Plant Sci 2001; 162:459-64; http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/320145.
2. Kaplan DR. Fundamental concepts of leaf morphology and morphogenesis: a contribution to the interpretation of molecular genetic mutants. Int J Plant Sci 2001; 162:465-74; http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/320135.
3. Hagemann W, Gleissberg S. Organogenetic capacity of leaves: the significance of marginal blastozones in angiosperms. Plant Syst Evol 1996; 199:121-52; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00984901.
4. Barth S, Geier T, Eimert K, Watillon B, Sangwan RS, Gleissberg S. KNOX overexpression in transgenic Kohleria (Gesneriaceae) prolongs the activity of proximal leaf blastozones and drastically alters segment fate. Planta 2009; 230:1081-91; PMID:19685246; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-009-0997-0.
5. Hareven D, Gutfinger T, Parnis A, Eshed Y, Lifschitz E. The making of a compound leaf: genetic manipulation of leaf architecture in tomato. Cell 1996; 84:735-44; PMID:8625411; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81051-X.
6. Hay A, Tsiantis M. The genetic basis for differences in leaf form between Arabidopsis thaliana and its wild relative Cardamine hirsuta. Nat Genet 2006; 38:942-7; PMID:16823378; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1835.
7. Janssen BJ, Lund L, Sinha N. Overexpression of a homeobox gene, LeT6, reveals indeterminate features in the tomato compound leaf. Plant Physiol 1998; 117:771-86; PMID:9662520; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.117.3.771.
8. Shani E, Burko Y, Ben-Yaakov L, Berger Y, Amsellem Z, Goldshmidt A, et al. Stage-specific regulation of Solanum lycopersicum leaf maturation by class 1 KNOTTED1-LIKE HOMEOBOX proteins. Plant Cell 2009; 21:3078-92; PMID:19820191; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.068148.
9. Shani E, Ben-Gera H, Shleizer-Burko S, Burko Y, Weiss D, Ori N. Cytokinin regulates compound leaf development in tomato. Plant Cell 2010; 22:3206-17; PMID:20959562; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.078253.
10. Efroni I, Blum E, Goldshmidt A, Eshed Y. A protracted and dynamic maturation schedule underlies Arabidopsis leaf development. Plant Cell 2008; 20:2293-306; PMID:18805992; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.107.057521.
11. Nath U, Crawford BC, Carpenter R, Coen E. Genetic control of surface curvature. Science 2003; 299:1404-7; PMID:12610308; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1079354.
12. Ori N, Cohen AR, Etzioni A, Brand A, Yanai O, Shleizer S, et al. Regulation of LANCEOLATE by miR319 is required for compound-leaf development in tomato. Nat Genet 2007; 39:787-91; PMID:17486095; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng2036.
13. Palatnik JF, Allen E, Wu X, Schommer C, Schwab R, Carrington JC, et al. Control of leaf morphogenesis by microRNAs. Nature 2003; 425:257-63; PMID:12931144; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01958.
14. Shleizer-Burko S, Burko Y, Ben-Herzel O, Ori N. Dynamic growth program regulated by LANCEOLATE enables flexible leaf patterning. Development 2011; 138:695-704; PMID:21228002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.056770.
15. Bassel GW, Mullen RT, Bewley JD. Procera is a putative DELLA mutant in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum): effects on the seed and vegetative plant. J Exp Bot 2008; 59:585-93; PMID:18250077; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm354.
16. Fleishon S, Shani E, Ori N, Weiss D. Negative reciprocal interactions between gibberellin and cytokinin in tomato. New Phytol 2011; 190:609-17; PMID:21244434; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03616.x.
17. Hay A, Kaur H, Phillips A, Hedden P, Hake S, Tsiantis M. The gibberellin pathway mediates KNOTTED1-type homeobox function in plants with different body plans. Curr Biol 2002; 12:1557-65; PMID:12372247; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01125-9.
18. Jasinski S, Tattersall A, Piazza P, Hay A, Martinez-Garcia JF, Schmitz G, et al. PROCERA encodes a DELLA protein that mediates control of dissected leaf form in tomato. Plant J 2008; 56:603-12; PMID:18643984; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03628.x.
19. Gray RA. Alteration of leaf size and shape and other changes caused by gibberellins in plants. Am J Bot 1957; 44:674-82; http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2438632.
20. Yanai O, Shani E, Russ D, Ori N. Gibberellin partly mediates LANCEOLATE activity in tomato. Plant J 2011; 68:571-82; PMID:21771122; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04716.x.
21. Barkoulas M, Hay A, Kougioumoutzi E, Tsiantis M. A developmental framework for dissected leaf formation in the Arabidopsis relative Cardamine hirsuta. Nat Genet 2008; 40:1136-41; PMID:19165928; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.189.
22. Ben-Gera H, Shwartz I, Shao MR, Shani E, Estelle M, Ori N. ENTIRE and GOBLET promote leaflet development in tomato by modulating auxin response. Plant J 2012; 70:903-15; PMID:22332729; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04939.x.
23. Blein T, Hasson A, Laufs P. Leaf development: what it needs to be complex. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2010; 13:75-82; PMID:19853496; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2009.09.017.
24. DeMason DA, Polowicky PL. Patterns of DR5:GUS expression in organs of Pea (Pisum sativum). Int J Plant Sci 2009; 170:1-11; http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/593046.
25. Koenig D, Bayer E, Kang J, Kuhlemeier C, Sinha N. Auxin patterns Solanum lycopersicum leaf morphogenesis. Development 2009; 136:2997-3006; PMID:19666826; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.033811.
26. Zhou C, Han L, Hou C, Metelli A, Qi L, Tadege M, et al. Developmental analysis of a Medicago truncatula smooth leaf margin1 mutant reveals context-dependent effects on compound leaf development. Plant Cell 2011; 23:2106-24; PMID:21693694; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.085464.
27. Berger Y, Harpaz-Saad S, Brand A, Melnik H, Sirding N, Alvarez JP, et al. The NAC-domain transcription factor GOBLET specifies leaflet boundaries in compound tomato leaves. Development 2009; 136:823-32; PMID:19176589; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.031625.
28. Wang H, Jones B, Li Z, Frasse P, Delalande C, Regad F, et al. The tomato Aux/IAA transcription factor IAA9 is involved in fruit development and leaf morphogenesis. Plant Cell 2005; 17:2676-92; PMID:16126837; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.033415.
29. Wang H, Schauer N, Usadel B, Frasse P, Zouine M, Hernould M, et al. Regulatory features underlying pollination-dependent and-independent tomato fruit set revealed by transcript and primary metabolite profiling. Plant Cell 2009; 21:1428-52; PMID:19435935; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.060830.
30. Zhang J, Chen R, Xiao J, Qian C, Wang T, Li H, et al. A single-base deletion mutation in SlIAA9 gene causes tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) entire mutant. J Plant Res 2007; 120:671-8; PMID:17955175; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10265-007-0109-9.
31. Dengler NG. Comparison of leaf development in Normal (+/+), Entire (E/E), and Lanceolate (La/+) plants of tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Ailsa Craig. Bot Gaz 1984; 145:66-77; http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/337428.
32. Parnis A, Cohen O, Gutfinger T, Hareven D, Zamir D, Lifschitz E. The dominant developmental mutants of tomato, Mouse-ear and Curl, are associated with distinct modes of abnormal transcriptional regulation of a Knotted gene. Plant Cell 1997; 9:2143-58; PMID:9437860.