Public Good as Public Interest?: The Principle of Tangibility in Eminent Domain Legislation

Public Integrity

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 333-352

  Olejarski, Amanda M ^a  

^a SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

eminent domain; ethics; public good; public interest

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044996185     PISSN: 10999922     EISSN: 15580989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2753/PIN1099-9922130403     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Benson, Bruce. L. 2008. "The Evolution of Eminent Domain: A Remedy for Market Failure or an Effort to Limit Government Power and Governmental Failure?" Independent Review 12: 423-432
2. Berliner, Dana. 2002. Government Theft: The Top 10 Abuses of Eminent Domain: 1998-2002. Available at http://www.castlecoalition.org/publications/top_10_abuses/index.html
3. Berliner, Dana. 2003. Public Power, Private Gain: A Five-Year, State-by-State Report Examining the Abuse of Eminent Domain. Arlington, Va.: Institute for Justice
4. Berliner, Dana. 2006. Opening the Floodgates: Eminent Domain Abuse in a Post-Kelo World. Arlington, Va.: Institute for Justice
5. Bixby, Michael B. 1987. "The ‘Public Use’ Requirement After Midkiff." American Business Law Journal 24: 621-641
6. Boudreaux, Paul. 2005. "Eminent Domain, Property Rights, and the Solution of Representative Reinforcement." Denver University Law Review 83: 1-55
7. Box, Richard C. 1992. "The Administrator as Trustee of the Public Interest: Normative Ideals and Daily Practice." Administration & Society 24: 323-345
8. Calfee, Corinne. 2006. "Kelo v. City of New London: The More Things Stay the Same, the More They Change." Ecology Law Quarterly 33: 545-581
9. Castle Coalition. 2009. "Enacted Legislation Since Kelo." Arlington, Va.: Castle Coalition. Available at http://www.castlecoalition.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=510&Itemid=107
10. Cohen, Charles E. 2006. "Eminent Domain After Kelo v. City of New London: An Argument for Banning Economic Development Takings." Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 29: 491-568
11. Coyne, Thomas J. 1985. "Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff: A Final Requiem for the Public Use Limitation on Eminent Domain?" Notre Dame Law Review 60: 388-404
12. Cypher, Matthew L., and Fred A. Forgey. 2003. "Eminent Domain: An Evaluation Based on Criteria Relating to Equity, Effectiveness, and Efficiency." Urban Affairs Review 39: 254-268
13. Dorf, Michael C. 2005. "Justice Stevens Adds Fuel to the Fire Over the New London Eminent Domain Case." Available at http://writ.lp.findlaw.com/dorf/20050829.html
14. Douglass, Bruce. 1980. "The Common Good and the Public Interest." Political Theory 8: 103-117
15. Epstein, Richard A. 1982. "Not Deference but Doctrine: The Eminent Domain Clause." Supreme Court Review, 351-380
16. The Federalist." PolityErler, Edward J. 1981. "The Problem of the Public Good in 4, 649-667
17. Farjad, Nasim. 2007. "Condemnation Friendly or Land Use Wise? A Broad Interpretation of the Public Use Requirement Works Well for New York City." Fordham Law Review 76: 1121-1191
18. Fawcett, David B., III. 1986. "Eminent Domain, the Police Power, and the Fifth Amendment: Defining the Domain of the Takings Analysis." University of Pittsburgh Law Review 47: 491-515
19. Goodin, Amanda. W. 2007. "Rejecting the Return to Blight in Post-Kelo State Legislation." New York University Law Review 82: 178-208
20. Refounding Public AdministrationGoodsell, Charles T. 1990. "Public Administration and the Public Interest." In, edited by Gary L. Wamsley, Robert N. Bacher, Charles T. Goodsell, Philip S. Kronenberg, John A. Rohr, Camilla M. Stivers, Orion F. White, and James F. Wolf, pp. 96-113. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage
21. Green, Richard T. 1992. "Constitutional Jurisprudence: Reviving Praxis in Public Administration." Administration & Society 24: 3-21
22. Han, Andrew S. 2008. "From New London to Norwood: A Year in the Life of Eminent Domain." Duke Law Journal 57: 1449-1483
23. Classics of Public AdministrationHerring, E. Pendleton. 1997. "Public Administration and the Public Interest." In, 4th ed., edited by Jay M. Shafritz and Albert C. Hyde, pp. 76-80. Fort Worth, Texas: Harcourt Brace
24. Horowitz, Donald L. 1977. "The Courts as Guardians of the Public Interest." Public Administration Review 37: 148-154
25. Knapp, Gregory S. 2008. "Maintaining Government Accountability: Calls for a ‘Public Use’ Beyond Eminent Domain." Indiana Law Journal 83: 1097-1119
26. Lewis, Carol W. 2006. "In Pursuit of the Public Interest." Public Administration Review 66: 694-701
27. Long, Norton E. 1988. "Public Administration, Cognitive Competence, and the Public Interest." Administration & Society 20: 334-343
28. Long, Norton E. 1991. "Politics, Political Science and the Public Interest." PS: Political Science & Politics 24: 670-675
29. Lopez, Edward J., and Sasha M. Totah. 2007. "Kelo and Its Discontents: The Worst (or Best?) Thing to Happen to Property Rights." Independent Review 11: 397-416
30. Mahoney, Julia D. 2005. "Kelo's Legacy: Eminent Domain and the Future of Property Rights." Supreme Court Review, 103-133
31. Main, Carla T. 2005. "How Eminent Domain Ran Amok." Policy Review 133: 3-24
32. Melton, Buckner F., Jr. 1996. "Eminent Domain, ‘Public Use,’ and the Conundrum of Original Intent." Natural Resources Journal 36: 59-85
33. Mitnick, Barry M. 1976. "A Typology of Conceptions of the Public Interest." Administration & Society 8: 5-28
34. Morgan, Douglas F. 2001. "The Public Interest." In Handbook of Administrative Ethics, 2d ed., edited by Terry L. Cooper, pp. 151-178. New York: Marcel Dekker
35. Mushkatel, Alvin, and Khalil Nakhleh. 1978. "Eminent Domain: Land-Use Planning and the Powerless in the United States and Israel." Social Problems 26: 147-159
36. Olejarski, Amanda M. 2008. "E[I]m[M]inent Domain: An Assumption of Academic Duty." Paper presented at the meeting of the Public Administration Theory Network, Richmond, Va
37. Olejarski, Amanda M. 2010/11. "The Kelo Opportunity: A Loss for the Court but a Gain for Public Administrators." Public Integrity 13: 41-58
38. The FederalistPublius. 1961., edited by Jacob E. Cooke. Cleveland: Meridian Books
39. Rohr, John A. 1989. Ethics for Bureaucrats: An Essay on Law and Values, 2d ed. New York: Marcel Dekker
40. Salkin, Patricia E., and Lora A. Lucero. 2005. "Community Redevelopment, Public Use, and Eminent Domain." Urban Lawyer 37: 201-242
41. Schubert, Glendon A., Jr. 1957. "‘The Public Interest’ in Administrative Decision-Making: Theorem, Theosophy, or Theory?" American Political Science Review 51: 346-368
42. Spicer, Michael W., and Larry D. Terry. 1993. "Legitimacy, History, and Logic: Public Administration and the Constitution." Public Administration Review 53: 239-246
43. Staley, Samuel R., and John P. Blair. 2005. "Eminent Domain, Private Property, and Redevelopment: An Economic Development Analysis." Available at http://www.reason.org/ps331.pdf
44. Stoebuck, William B. 1972. "A General Theory of Eminent Domain." Washington Law Review 47: 553-608
45. Refounding Public AdministrationWamsley, Gary L., Charles T. Goodsell, John A. Rohr, Camilla M. Stivers, Orion F. White, and James F. Wolf. 1990. "Public Administration and the Governance Process: Shifting the Political Dialogue." In, edited by Gary L. Wamsley, Robert N. Bacher, Charles T. Goodsell, Philip S. Kronenberg, John A. Rohr, Camilla M. Stivers, Orion F. White, and James F. Wolf, pp. 31-51. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage
46. Wilder, Margaret G., and Joyce E. Stigter. 1989. "Rethinking the Role of Judicial Scrutiny in Eminent Domain." Journal of the American Planning Association 55: 57-65
47. Berman et al., Executors v. Parker et al., 348 U.S. 26 (1954)
48. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U.S. 112 (1896)
49. Hawaii Housing Authority et al. v. Midkiff et al., 467 U.S. 229 (1984)
50. Kelo et al. v. City of New London et al., 545 U.S. 469 (2005)