Characteristics of e-mail solicitations from predatory nursing journals and publishers

Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 171-177

  Lewinski, Allison A ^a   Oermann, Marilyn H ^b  

^a DURHAM VA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; E-MAIL; EDUCATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; PUBLISHING; SCHOOL HEALTH NURSING; STUDENT; ETHICS; NURSING CARE; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES;

ELECTRONIC MAIL; HUMANS; NURSING CARE; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85044987994     PISSN: 00220124     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/00220124-20180320-07     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Beall, J. (2015). Criteria for determining predatory open-ac-cess publishers. Retrieved from http://libguides.uwi.edu/ld.php?content_id=23397574
2. Beall, J. (2017). What I learned from predatory publishers. Biochemia Medica: Casopis Hrvatskoga Drustva Medicinskih Biokemicara, 27, 273-278. doi:10.11613/bm.2017.029
3. Eriksson, S., & Helgesson, G. (2017). The false academy: Predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 20, 163-170. doi:10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3
4. Frandsen, T.F. (2017). Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers. Scientometrics, 113, 1513-1528. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2520-x
5. Hansoti, B., Langdorf, M.I., & Murphy, L.S. (2016). Discriminating between legitimate and predatory open access journals: Report from the International Federation for Emergency Medicine Research Committee. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 17, 497-507. doi:10.5811/westjem.2016.7.30328
6. Kozak, M., Iefremova, O., & Hartley, J. (2016). Spamming in scholarly publishing: A case study. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67, 2009-2015. doi:10.1002/asi.23521
7. Laine, C., & Winker, M.A. (2017). Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals. Biochemia Medica: Casopis Hrvatskoga Drustva Medicinskih Biokemicara, 27, 285-291. doi:10.11613/bm.2017.031
8. Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Cobey, K.D., Lalu, M.M., Galipeau, J., Avey, M.T., … Ziai, H. (2017). Stop this waste of people, animals and money. Nature, 549(7670), 23-25. doi:10.1038/549023a
9. Moher, D., & Srivastava, A. (2015). You are invited to submit. BMC Medicine, 13, 180. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0423-3
10. Nicoll, L.M. (2014). Predatory publishing: What editors need to know. INANE “Predatory Publishing Practices” Collaborative. Nurse Author & Editor, 24, 2.
11. Nicoll, L.M., & Chinn, P.L. (2015). Caught in the trap: The allure of deceptive publishers. Nurse Author & Editor, 25, 4.
12. Oermann, M.H., Conklin, J.L., Nicoll, L.H., Chinn, P.L., Ashton, K.S., Edie, A.H., … Budinger, S.C. (2016). Study of predatory open access nursing journals. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 48, 624-632. doi:10.1111/jnu.12248
13. Oermann, M.H., Nicoll, L.H., Chinn, P.L., Ashton, K.S., Conklin, J.L., Edie, A.H., … Williams, B.L. (2018). Quality of articles published in predatory nursing journals. Nursing Outlook, 66, 4-10. doi:10.1016/j. outlook.2017.05.005
14. Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Maduekwe, O., Turner, L., Barbour, V., Burch, R., . . . Shea, B.J. (2017). Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: Can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine, 15, 28. doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9
15. Shen, C., & Bjork, B.C. (2015). ‘Predatory’ open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine, 13, 230. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2