Does size matter? cfsp committees after enlargement

Journal of European Integration

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 493-509

  Juncos, Ana E ^a   Pomorska, Karolina ^b  

^a Languages and International Studies at the University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

CFSP; Enlargement; EU committees; formal and informal rules; governance

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044882327     PISSN: 07036337     EISSN: 14772280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07036330802294771     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allen, D., 1998. “ Who speaks for Europe? The search for an effective and coherent external policy ”. In A common foreign policy for Europe? Competing visions of the CFSP, Edited by: Peterson, J., and Sjursen, H., 41–58. London: Routledge.
2. Archer, C., 2004. “ The European Union as an international political actor ”. In European Union enlargement, Edited by: Nugent, N., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Barbé, E., and Herranz, A., 2005. “ Introduction ”. In The role of parliaments in European foreign policy: debating on accountability and legitimacy, Edited by: Barbé, E., and Herranz, A., Barcelona: Office of the European Parliament in Barcelona.
4. Bono, G., 2006. Challenges of democratic oversight of EU security policies. European Security, 15 (4): 431–49.
5. Cameron, F., 1999. The foreign and security policy of the European Union: past, present and future, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
6. Cameron, F., and Primatarova, A., 2003. Enlargement, CFSP and the convention The role of the accession states. EPIN Working Paper 5, June
7. Christiansen, T., and Kirchner, E., 2000. “ Introduction ”. In Committee governance in the European Union, Edited by: Christiansen, T., and Kirchner, E., 1–22. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
8. Christiansen, T., and Piattoni, S., eds. 2004. Informal governance in the European Union, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
9. Council of the EU. 2004. Council decision of 22 March 2004 adopting the Council’s rules of procedure 2004/338/EC, OJ L 106/22
10. de Schouthetee, P., 1980. La Coopération Politique Européenne, Paris: Nathan.
11. Duke, S., 2007. “ The role of committees and working groups in the CFSP area ”. In The role of committees in the policy-process of the European Union: legislation, implementation, deliberation, Edited by: Christiansen, T., and Larsson, T., 120–51. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
12. Edwards, G., 2005. The new member states and the EU foreign policy making. CFSP Forum, 3 (6): 13–16.
13. European Report. 2005. EU/South caucasus: stronger ties in limbo due to Azerbaijan-Northern Cyprus flights 19 October
14. Haas, P., 1992. Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46 (1): 1–35.
15. Juncos, A., and Pomorska, K., 2006. Playing the Brussels game: strategic socialisation in the CFSP council working groups. European Integration Online Papers, 10 http://eiop.or.at/
16. Missiroli, A., 2003. EU Enlargement and CFSP/ESDP. Journal of European Integration, 25 (1): 1–16.
17. Nuttall, S., 1992. European political cooperation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Nuttall, S., 2000. European foreign policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Pomorska, K., 2007. The impact of enlargement: Europeanisation of Polish foreign policy? Tracking adaptation and change in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2 (1): 25–51.
20. Presidency of the EU. 1999. Presidency conclusions of the Helsinki European Council 10 and 11 December, SN 300/99
21. Presidency of the EU. 2002. Presidency conclusions of the Helsinki European Council 21 and 22 June, SN 200/02
22. Puetter, U., 2003. Informal circles of ministers: a way out of the EU’s institutional dilemmas?. European Law Journal, 9 (1): 109–24.
23. Quaglia, L., De Francesco, F., and Radaelli, C., 2008. Committee governance and socialization in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 15 (1): 155–66.
24. Sjursen, H., 1998. Enlargement and the Common Foreign and Security Policy: transforming the EU’s external policy? ARENA Working Papers, WP 98/18
25. Smith, M. E., 2000. Conforming to Europe: the domestic impact of EU foreign policy co-operation. Journal of European Public Policy, 7 (4): 613–31.
26. Smith, M. E., 2001. “ The quest for coherence: institutional dilemmas of external action from Maastricht to Amsterdam ”. In The institutionalisation of Europe, Edited by: Stone Sweet, A., Sandholtz, W., and Fligstein, N., 171–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Smith, M. E., 2004. Europe’s foreign and security policy: the institutionalization of cooperation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Tonra, B., 2000. “ Committees in common: committee governance and CFSP ”. In Committee governance in the European Union, Edited by: Christiansen, T., and Kirchner, E., 145–60. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
29. Tonra, B., 2001. The Europeanisation of national foreign policy: Dutch, Danish and Irish foreign policy in the European Union, Aldershot: Ashgate.
30. th ECSA Conference. December6, Brussels.
31. Whitman, R., 1999. “ The Common Foreign and Security Policy after enlargement ”. In The enlargement of the European Union, Edited by: Curzon Price, V., Landau, A., and Whitman, R., 135–60. London: Routledge.