EU enlargement and CFSP/ESDP

Journal of European Integration

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-16

  Missiroli, Antonio ^a  

^a EU Institute for Security Studies in Paris   (France)

Author keywords

Central europe; Cfsp; Enlargement; Esdp; Eu; Security

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055299748     PISSN: 07036337     EISSN: 14772280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0703633031000077190     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Amato, G., and Batt, J., eds. 1999. The Long-Term Implications of EU Enlargement: The Nature of the New Border, Florence.: EUl.
2. Avery, G., and Cameron, F., 1998. The Enlargement of the European Union, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
3. Avery, G., 2002. Endgame for EU Enlargement. Prospect, July: 54-7. 2002
4. Bourcier, N., 2002. Les Européens de l'Est sont attachés à l'élargissement. Le Monde, 20 Mars
5. Brzezinski, Zbigniew. 2001. NATO and the EU Need to Grow Together. international Herald Tribune, 17 May
6. Cecchini, P., Jones, E., and Lorentzen, J., 2001. Europe and the Concept of Enlargement. Survival, XLIII: 1155-165.
7. Cottey, A., ed. 1999. Subregional Cooperation in the New Europe: Building Security. Prosperity and Solidarity from the Barents to the Black Sea, New York: East-West Institute.
8. Croft, S., Terriff, T, Lucy James, L., and Morgan, P.M., 1999. The Enlargement of Europe, Manchester-New York: Manchester University Press.
9. Dempsey, J., 2002a. EU Tries to Avoid Conflict with US over Court. Financial Times, 29 August: 2 2002
10. Dempsey, J., 2002b. NATO Hopefuls Feel US Pressure over ICC. Financial Times, 30 August: 2 2002
11. Dempsey, J., 2002c. EU's Deal on International Court Leaves US Unsatisfied. Financial Times, 3 October: 2 2002
12. Draus, F., 2000. “ Un élargissement pas comme les autres. Reflexion sur les spécificités des pays candidats d'Europe centrale et orientale ”. In Etudes et recherches Vol. 11, Paris Notre Europe
13. Drulak, P., ed. 2001. National and European Identities in EU Enlargement: Views from Central and Eastern Europe, Prague: HR.
14. Dunay, P., 2001. Boxes: Why CFSP and CESDP Do Not Matter Much to EU Candidate Countries, RSC Policy Papers 01/5 Florence: EUI.
15. Fitchett, J., 2002. NATO Opens Door to 7 More Nations. international Herald Tribune, 22 November: 1-4. 2002
16. Grabbe, H., 2000. The Sharp Edges of Europe: Security Implications of Extending EU Border Policies Eastwards, Paris: WEU-ISS. Occasional Paper 13
17. Grabbe, H., June 2002 2002. The Benes Decrees: Implications for EU Enlargement, June 2002, London: CER. Briefing Note, in www.cer.org.uk
18. Giessmann, H.J., and Gustenau, G.E., eds. 2001. Security Handbook 2001 - Security and Military in Central and Eastern Europe, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
19. Guicherd, C., June 2002. The Enlarged EU's Eastern Border: Integrating Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova in the European Project, SWP-Studie 20, June, Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
20. Haukkala, H., and Medvedev, S., eds. 2001. The EU Common Strategy on Russia: Learning the Grammar of the CFSP, Helsinki: UPI-FIIA.
21. Henderson, K., ed. 1999. Back to Europe: Central and Eastern Europe and the European Union, London: UCL Press.
22. Hyde-Price, A., 1996. The International Politics of East-Central Europe, Manchester-New York: Manchester University Press.
23. Hyde-Price, A., 2000. The Antinomies of European Security: Dual Enlargement and the Reshaping of the European Order. Contemporary Security Policy, XXI: 3139-67. 2000
24. Katzenstein, P., ed. 1997. Mitteleuropa: Between Europe and Germany, Providence-Oxford: Berghahn Books.
25. Kempe, I., ed. 2001. Beyond EU Enlargement, vol 1, The Agenda of Direct Neighbourhood for Eastern Europe, vol 1, Gutersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers.
26. Le Rider, J., 1994. La Mitteleuropa, Paris: PUF.
27. Lewis, A., ed. 2002. The EU and Belarus: Between Moscow and Brussels, London: The Federal Trust.
28. Linz, J., and Stepan, A., eds. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe South America, and Post-Communist Europe, Baltimore-London: John Hopkins University Press.
29. Lord, C., ed. 2000. Central Europe: Core or Periphery?, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
30. Luif, P., ed. 2001. Security in Central and Eastern Europe: Problems. Perceptions, Braumüller, Wien: Policies.
31. Lynch, D., May 2002. Crisis in Moldova, Newsletter, May, 2Paris: EU-ISS. n°, 2002 (www.iss-eu.org)
32. Making Sense of the Helsinki Headline Goal. November 2001. King's College Centre for Defence Studies November, London
33. Mair, P., and Zielonka, J., eds. 2002. The Enlarged European Union: Diversity and Adaptation, Southgate and London: Frank Cass.
34. Mann, M., 2002. Strong Support for EU in Candidate States. Financial Times, 19.
35. Maresceau, M., and Lannon, E., eds. 2001. The EU Enlargement and Mediterranean Strategies: A Comparative Analysis, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
36. Medvedev, S., 1998. “Zwischeneuropa”. In Historic Experiences, National Views and Strategic Alternatives, UPI Working Papers 6 Helsinki
37. Missiroli, A., ed. 2001. Coherence for European Security Policy: Debates - Cases - Assessments, Occasional Paper 27 Paris: WEU-ISS.
38. Missiroli, A., ed. April 2002. Bigger EU, Wider CFSP, Stronger ESDP? The View from Central Europe, Occasional Paper 34 April, Paris.: EU-ISS.
39. Missiroli, A., 2002. EU-NATO Cooperation in Crisis Management: No Turkish Delight for ESDP. Security Dialogue, XXXIII: 19-26. 2002
40. Missiroli, A., August 2002. The European Union and Its Changing Periphery: Stabilisation, Integration, Partnership, Occasional Paper 32 August, Geneva: GCSP. August 2002
41. Monar, J., 2001. The JHA Dimension of EU Enlargement. The International Spectator, XXXVI: 337-46. 2001
42. Pflügler, F., 2000. An Atlantic Anchor for All of Europe. International Herald Tribune, 5 December 2000
43. Pridham, G., and Agh, A., eds. 2001. Prospects for Democratic Consolidation in East-Central Europe, Manchester-New York: Manchester University Press.
44. Pridham, G., 2002. EU Enlargement and Consolidating Democracy in Post-Communist States - Formality and Reality. Journal of Common Market Studies, XL: 3953-73. 2002
45. Quinlan, M., 2002. “ ESDP and EU Enlargement ”. In The Ell's Search for a Strategic Role: ESDP and its Implications for Transatlantic Relations, Edited by: Brimmer, E., 23-34. Washington D.C: Centre for Transatlantic Relations.
46. Redmond, J., ed. 1997. The 1995 Enlargement of the European Union, Aldershot: Ashgate.
47. Schöpflin, G., and Wood, N., eds. 1989. In Search of Central Europe, Cambridge: Polity Press.
48. Sedelmeyer, U., and Wallace, H., 2000. “ Eastern Enlargement ”. In Policy-Mating in the European Union, IV ed., Edited by: Wallace, H., and Wallace, W., 427-60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Rupnik, J., 1988. The Other Europe, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
50. Sedivy, J., 2001. The Puzzle of NATO Enlargement. Contemporary Security Policy, XXII: 21-26. 2001
51. Sedivy, J., Dunay, P., and Saryusz-Wolski, J., June 2002. Enlargement and European Defence after 11 September, June, Paris: EU-ISS. Chaillot Paper 53
52. Smith, K.E., 1999. The Making of EU Foreign Policy: The Case of Eastern Europe, New York: St.Martin's Press.
53. Smith, M.A., and Timmins, G., 2000. Building a Bigger Europe: EU and NATO Enlargement in Comparative Perspective, Aldershot: Ashgate.
54. Szayna, TS., 2001. NATO Enlargement 2000-2015: Determinants and Implications for Defence Planning and Shaping, Santa Monica-Arlington: RAND.
55. Tanner, F., 2001. The European Union as a Security Actor in the Mediterranean: ESDP, Soft Power and Peacemaking in EuroMediterranean Relations. Zürcher Beiträge zur Sicherheitspolitik und Konfliktforschung, Nr.61
56. 2002. “ International Institute of Strategie Studies ”. In The Military Balance 2002-03 London
57. Villa Faber Group. 2001. Thinking Enlarged - The Accession Countries and the Future of the European Union: A Strategy for Reform, Gutersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation & Centre for Applied Policy Research.
58. von Beyme, K., 1996. Transition to Democracy in Eastern Europe, Basingstoke-London: Macmillan.
59. Wagstyl, S., 2002. A Symbolic Step for Former Communist States. Financial Times, 19 November: 2 2002
60. Webber, M., 2001. Third-Party Inclusion in ESDP: A Case Study of Russia. European Foreign Affairs Review, VI: 4407-26. 2001
61. White, S., McAllister, I., and Light, M., 2002. Enlargement and the New Outsiders. Journal of Common Market Studies, XL: 1135-53. 2002