Technologies in schools: Stimulating a dialogue

Teachers College Record

Volumn 109, Issue 14, 2007, Pages 1-10

  Smolin, Louanne ^a   Lawless, Kimberly ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044860186     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alexander, P.A., & Fox, E. (2004). A historical perspective on reading research and practice. In R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 33-68). Newark, DE: International Reading Association
2. Bruner, J. (2004). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press
3. Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D.J. (in press). Handbook of research on new literacies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
4. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813-834
5. Dieberger, A. (1997). Supporting social navigation on theWorldWideWeb. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46, 805-825
6. Gewertz, C. (2007, March 29). Outside interests: Young people typically plug in to new technology far more often on their own time than in school. Education Week, Technology Counts 2007. Retrieved October 6, 2007, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/ articles/2007/03/29/30tcstudent.h26.html
7. Grabinger, R.S., Dunlap, J.C., & Duffield, J.A. (1997). Rich environments for active learning in action: Problem-based learning. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 5(2), 5-17
8. International Society for Technology in Education (2007). National educational technology standards for students: The next generation.Washington, DC: ISTE. Retrieved October 6, 2007, from http://www.iste.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=NETS
9. Kozma, R. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179-211
10. Leu, D.J., Jr., & Kinzer, C.K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(1), 108-127
11. Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132-141
12. Moursund, D., & Bielefeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in the digital age: A national survey on information technology in teacher education. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Information Technology
13. National Center For Education Statistics. (2000). Teacher use of computers and the Internet in public schools. Institute of Educational Sciences. Retrieved October 1, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/frss/publications/2000090/index.asp?sectionID=2
14. National Research Council. (1999). Improving student learning: A strategic plan for education research and its utilization. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
15. November, A. (2001). Empowering students with technology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
16. Ringstaff, C., & Kelley, L. (2002). The learning return on our educational investment. San Francisco: WestEd RTEC
17. Schank, R., & Cleary, C. (1995). Engines for education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
18. Scott, T., Cole, M., & Engel, M. (1992). Computers and education: A cultural constructivist perspective. Review of Research in Education, 10, 191-251
19. Sherman, B. (1985). The new revolution: The impact of computing on society. New York: Wiley
20. Thornburg, D. (2002). The new basics: Education and the future of work in the telematic age. Washington DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
21. Unsworth, L. (2002). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. New York: Open University Press
22. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
23. Waxman, H.C., Lin, M., & Michko, G. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of teaching and learning with technology on student outcomes. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates
24. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
25. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
26. Wraga, W. (2002). Recovering curriculum practice: Continuing the conversation. Educational Researcher, 31(6), 17-19
27. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840